Browsing by Author "Conwit, Robin"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose, adult survivors of after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    (Research Square, 2024-06-21) Meurer, William; Schmitzberger, Florian; Yeatts, Sharon; Ramakrishnan, Viswanathan; Abella, Benjamin; Aufderheide, Tom; Barsan, William; Benoit, Justin; Berry, Scott; Black, Joy; Bozeman, Nia; Broglio, Kristine; Brown, Jeremy; Brown, Kimberly; Carlozzi, Noelle; Caveney, Angela; Cho, Sung-Min; Chung-Esaki, Hangyul; Clevenger, Robert; Conwit, Robin; Cooper, Richelle; Crudo, Valentina; Daya, Mohamud; Harney, Deneil; Hsu, Cindy; Johnson, Nicholas J.; Khan, Imad; Khosla, Shaveta; Kline, Peyton; Kratz, Anna; Kudenchuk, Peter; Lewis, Roger J.; Madiyal, Chaitra; Meyer, Sara; Mosier, Jarrod; Mouammar, Marwan; Neth, Matthew; O'Neil, Brian; Paxton, James; Perez, Sofia; Perman, Sarah; Sozener, Cemal; Speers, Mickie; Spiteri, Aimee; Stevenson, Valerie; Sunthankar, Kavita; Tonna, Joseph; Youngquist, Scott; Geocadin, Romergryko; Silbergleit, Robert; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the United States. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. Methods: This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 hours of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 hours will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient reported quality of life measures. Discussion: In-vitro and in-vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Lawful physician-hastened death: AAN position statement
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2018-02-27) Russell, James A.; Epstein, Leon G.; Bonnie, Richard J.; Conwit, Robin; Graf, William D.; Kirschen, Matthew; Kurek, Julie A.; Larriviere, Daniel G.; Pascuzzi, Robert M.; Rizzo, Matthew; Sattin, Justin A.; Simmons, Zachary; Taylor, Lynne; Tsou, Amy; Williams, Michael A.; Neurology, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Long-term effect of thymectomy in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis treated with prednisone: 2-year extension of the MGTX randomised tria
    (Elsevier, 2019-03) Wolfe, Gil I.; Kaminski, Henry J.; Aban, Inmaculada B.; Minisman, Greg; Kuo, Hui-Chien; Marx, Alexander; Ströbel, Philipp; Mazia, Claudio; Oger, Joel; Cea, J. Gabriel; Heckmann, Jeannine M.; Evoli, Amelia; Nix, Wilfred; Ciafaloni, Emma; Antonini, Giovanni; Witoonpanich, Rawiphan; King, John O.; Beydoun, Said R.; Chalk, Colin H.; Barboi, Alexandru C.; Amato, Anthony A.; Shaibani, Aziz I.; Katirji, Bashar; Lecky, Bryan R. F.; Buckley, Camilla; Vincent, Angela; Dias-Tosta, Elza; Yoshikawa, Hiroaki; Waddington-Cruz, Márcia; Pulley, Michael T.; Rivner, Michael H.; Kostera-Pruszczyk, Anna; Pascuzzi, Robert M.; Jackson, Carlayne E.; Verschuuren, Jan J. G. M.; Massey, Janice M.; Kissel, John T.; Werneck, Lineu C.; Benatar, Michael; Barohn, Richard J.; Tandan, Rup; Mozaffar, Tahseen; Silvestri, Nicholas J.; Conwit, Robin; Sonett, Joshua R.; Jaretzki, Alfred, III; Newsom-Davis, John; Cutter, Gary R.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: The MGTX trial demonstrated that thymectomy combined with prednisone was superior to prednisone alone in improving clinical status measured by the Quantitative MG (QMG) score in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis at 3 years. We investigated the long-term effects of thymectomy up to 5 years on clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events. Methods: A multicentre, rater-blinded 2-year extension study was conducted across 36 centres in 15 countries for patients who completed the MGTX randomised, controlled trial and were willing to participate. MGTX trial patients were aged 18 to 65 years at enrollment, had generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) with disease duration less than 5 years and elevated (≥1.00 nmol/l; 0.50–0.99 nmol/l allowed if confirmed by positive edrophonium or electrophysiologic testing) acetylcholine receptor antibody titers.. All patients received oral prednisone at doses titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved minimal manifestation status. The primary endpoints were the time-weighted average of both the QMG and alternate-day prednisone dose from month 0 to month 60. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00294658. Findings: Of 111 subjects who completed the 3-year MGTX trial, 68 (61%) entered the extension study between September 1, 2009 and August 26, 2015 (33 prednisone alone; 35 prednisone plus thymectomy). Of the 68, 50 (74%) completed the 60-month assessment (24 prednisone alone; 26 prednisone plus thymectomy). At 5 years, patients randomised to thymectomy plus prednisone continued to demonstrate improved clinical status compared to patients in the prednisone alone group based on time-weighted average QMG (5.47±3.87 vs. 9.34±5.08; 95% CI for the difference 0.71–7.04; p=0.0007) and lower average alternate-day prednisone requirements (24 mg±21 mg vs. 48±29 mg; 95% CI for the difference 12–36 mg; p=0.0002). The proportion of patients requiring hospitalisation for MG exacerbation (6% vs. 30%; 95% CI for the difference 7.1–42.1%; p=0.0105) was lower in the thymectomy group. Other MEDRA-coded adverse events were infrequent, occurring at a rate of ≤6% in both groups and did not differ significantly between them. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: After 5 years, thymectomy continues to confer benefits in generalised non-thymomatous MG. Although caution in predicting benefit for all such patients is appropriate since the extension study included only half of MGTX trial subjects, results available through month 60 provide further evidence to support thymectomy in this large group of patients with generalised MG.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Quantifying the amount of greater brain ischemia protection time with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital neuroprotective agent start
    (Frontiers Media, 2022) Matossian, Vartan; Starkman, Sidney; Sanossian, Nerses; Stratton, Samuel; Eckstein, Marc; Conwit, Robin; Liebeskind, David S.; Sharma, Latisha; Tenser, May-Kim; Saver, Jeffrey L.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    The objective of this study is to quantify the increase in brain-under-protection time that may be achieved with pre-hospital compared with the post-arrival start of neuroprotective therapy among patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. In order to do this, a comparative analysis was performed of two randomized trials of neuroprotective agents: (1) pre-hospital strategy: Field administration of stroke therapy-magnesium (FAST-MAG) Trial; (2) in-hospital strategy: Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) Trial. In the FAST-MAG trial, among 1,041 acute ischemic stroke patients, 44 were treated with endovascular reperfusion therapy (ERT), including 32 treated with both intravenous thrombolysis and ERT and 12 treated with ERT alone. In the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, among 1,105 acute ischemic stroke patients, 659 were treated with both intravenous thrombolysis and ERT, and 446 were treated with ERT alone. The start of the neuroprotective agent was sooner after onset with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital start: 45 m (IQR 38-56) vs. 122 m. The neuroprotective agent in FAST-MAG was started 8 min prior to ED arrival compared with 64 min after arrival in ESCAPE-NA1. Projecting modern endovascular workflows to FAST-MAG, the total time of "brain under protection" (neuroprotective agent start to reperfusion) was greater with pre-hospital than in-hospital start: 94 m (IQR 90-98) vs. 22 m. Initiating a neuroprotective agent in the pre-hospital setting enables a faster treatment start, yielding 72 min additional brain protection time for patients with acute ischemic stroke. These findings provide support for the increased performance of ambulance-based, pre-hospital treatment trials in the development of neuroprotective stroke therapies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is comparable to the ICH score in predicting outcomes in spontaneous acute intracerebral hemorrhage
    (Frontiers Media, 2024-07-01) Kazaryan, Suzie A.; Shkirkova, Kristina; Saver, Jeffrey L.; Liebeskind, David S.; Starkman, Sidney; Bulic, Sebina; Poblete, Roy; Kim-Tenser, May; Guo, Shujing; Conwit, Robin; Villablanca, Pablo; Hamilton, Scott; Sanossian, Nerses; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Validating the National Institutes of Health NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as a tool to assess deficit severity and prognosis in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage would harmonize the assessment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, enable clinical use of a readily implementable and non-imaging dependent prognostic tool, and improve monitoring of ICH care quality in administrative datasets. Methods: Among randomized trial ICH patients, the relation between NIHSS scores early after Emergency Department arrival and 3-month outcomes of dependency or death (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 3-6) and case fatality was examined. NIHSS predictive performance was compared to a current standard prognostic scale, the intracerebral hemorrhage score (ICH score). Results: Among the 384 patients, the mean age was 65 (±13), with 66% being male. The median NIHSS score was 16 (interquartile range (IQR) 9-25), the mean initial hematoma volume was 29 mL (±38), and the ICH score median was 1 (IQR 0-2). At 3 months, the mRS had a median of 4 (IQR 2-6), with dependency or death occurring in 70% and case fatality in 26%. The NIHSS and ICH scores were strongly correlated (r = 0.73), and each was strongly correlated with the 90-day mRS (NIHSS, r = 0.61; ICH score, r = 0.62). The NIHSS performed comparably to the ICH score in predicting both dependency or death (c = 0.80 vs. 0.80, p = 0.83) and case fatality (c = 0.78 vs. 0.80, p = 0.29). At threshold values, the NIHSS predicted dependency or death with 74.1% accuracy (NIHSS 17.5) and case fatality with 75.0% accuracy (NIHSS 18.5). Conclusion: The NIHSS forecasts 3-month functional and case fatality outcomes with accuracy comparable to the ICH Score. Widely documented in routine clinical care and administrative data, the NIHSS can serve as a valuable measure for clinical prognostication, therapy development, and case-mix risk adjustment in ICH patients.