- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Compérat, Eva"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Gleason Grade 4 Prostate Adenocarcinoma Patterns: An Inter-observer Agreement Study among Genitourinary Pathologists(Wiley, 2016-09) Kweldam, Charlotte F.; Nieboer, Daan; Algaba, Ferran; Amin, Mahul B.; Berney, Dan M.; Billis, Athanase; Bostwick, David G.; Bubendorf, Lukas; Cheng, Liang; Compérat, Eva; Delahunt, Brett; Egevad, Lars; Evans, Andrew J.; Hansel, Donna E.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Kristiansen, Glen; van der Kwast, Theodorus H.; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; Montironi, Rodolfo; Netto, George J.; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Srigley, John R.; Tan, Puay H.; Varma, Murali; Zhou, Ming; van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IU School of MedicineAims To assess the interobserver reproducibility of individual Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. Methods and results Twenty-three genitourinary pathologists participated in the evaluation of 60 selected high-magnification photographs. The selection included 10 cases of Gleason grade 3, 40 of Gleason grade 4 (10 per growth pattern), and 10 of Gleason grade 5. Participants were asked to select a single predominant Gleason grade per case (3, 4, or 5), and to indicate the predominant Gleason grade 4 growth pattern, if present. ‘Consensus’ was defined as at least 80% agreement, and ‘favoured’ as 60–80% agreement. Consensus on Gleason grading was reached in 47 of 60 (78%) cases, 35 of which were assigned to grade 4. In the 13 non-consensus cases, ill-formed (6/13, 46%) and fused (7/13, 54%) patterns were involved in the disagreement. Among the 20 cases where at least one pathologist assigned the ill-formed growth pattern, none (0%, 0/20) reached consensus. Consensus for fused, cribriform and glomeruloid glands was reached in 2%, 23% and 38% of cases, respectively. In nine of 35 (26%) consensus Gleason grade 4 cases, participants disagreed on the growth pattern. Six of these were characterized by large epithelial proliferations with delicate intervening fibrovascular cores, which were alternatively given the designation fused or cribriform growth pattern (‘complex fused’). Conclusions Consensus on Gleason grade 4 growth pattern was predominantly reached on cribriform and glomeruloid patterns, but rarely on ill-formed and fused glands. The complex fused glands seem to constitute a borderline pattern of unknown prognostic significance on which a consensus could not be reached.Item Handling and reporting of orchidectomy specimens with testicular cancer: areas of consensus and variation among 25 experts and 225 European pathologists(Wiley, 2015-09) Berney, Daniel M.; Algaba, Ferran; Amin, Mahul; Delahunt, Brett; Compérat, Eva; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Humphrey, Peter; Idrees, Mohammed; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; Mikuz, Gregor; Montironi, Rodolfo; Oliva, Esther; Srigley, John; Reuter, Victor E.; Trpkov, Kiril; Ulbright, Thomas M.; Varma, Murali; Verrill, Clare; Young, Robert H.; Zhou, Ming; Egevad, Lars; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IU School of MedicineThe handling and reporting of testicular tumours is difficult due to their rarity. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey developed by the European Network of Uro-Pathology (ENUP) and sent to its members and experts to assess the evaluation of testicular germ cell tumours. Twenty-five experts and 225 ENUP members replied. Areas of disagreement included immaturity in teratomas, reported by 32% of experts but 68% of ENUP. Although the presence of rete testis invasion was reported widely, the distinction between pagetoid and stromal invasion was made by 96% of experts but only 63% of ENUP. Immunohistochemistry was used in more than 50% of cases by 68% of ENUP and 12% of experts. Staging revealed the greatest areas of disagreement. Invasion of the tunica vaginalis without vascular invasion was interpreted as T1 by 52% of experts and 67% of ENUP, but T2 by the remainder. Tumour invading the hilar adipose tissue adjacent to the epididymis without vascular invasion was interpreted as T1: 40% of experts, 43% of ENUP; T2: 36% of experts, 30% of ENUP; and T3: 24% of experts, 27% of ENUP. CONCLUSIONS: There is remarkable consensus in many areas of testicular pathology. Significant areas of disagreement included staging and reporting of histological types, both of which have the potential to impact on therapyItem Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: evaluation of HER2 status and immunohistochemical characterization of the molecular subtype(Elsevier, 2018) Zinnall, Ulrike; Weyerer, Veronika; Compérat, Eva; Camparo, Philippe; Gaisa, Nadine T.; Knuechel-Clarke, Ruth; Perren, Aurel; Lugli, Alessandro; Toma, Marieta; Baretton, Gustavo; Kristiansen, Glen; Wirtz, Ralf M.; Cheng, Liang; Wullich, Bernd; Stoehr, Robert; Hartmann, Arndt; Bertz, Simone; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineComprehensive molecular analyses of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) have defined distinct subtypes with potential therapeutic implications. In this study, we focused on micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC), an aggressive, histomorphologically defined rare variant. Apart from genetic alterations shared with conventional UBC, alterations of the HER2 gene have been reported in higher frequencies. However, only small cohorts of MPUCs have been analyzed, and the real impact is still unclear. We collected a cohort of 94 MPUCs and immunohistochemically tested HER2, basal (CD44, CK5, EGFR, p63) and luminal (CD24, FOXA1, GATA3, CK20) markers to allocate MPUC to a molecular subtype. Additionally, HER2 amplification status was assigned by chromogenic in situ hybridization. Sanger sequencing of exon 4 and 8 was used to test for HER2 mutations. Kruskal-Wallis test was calculated to compare marker distribution between proportions of the MPUC component. HER2 2+/3+ staining scores were identified in 39.6% of 91 analyzed MPUCs and were not differentially distributed among the proportion of the MPUC component (P = .89). Additionally, CISH analysis revealed 30% of HER2-amplified tumors independently of the MPUC fraction. In 6/90 evaluable MPUCs, a p.S310F HER2 mutation was detected. Overexpression of luminal markers was observed in the majority of MPUC. Our investigations of the largest cohort of analyzed MPUC demonstrate that HER2 overexpression and amplifications are common genetic alterations and identification of overexpressed luminal markers allows subclassification to the luminal subtype. These findings highlight the need of histomorphological recognition of MPUC and analysis of HER2 status and the luminal molecular subtype for potential targeted therapeutic strategies.Item Reappraisal of Morphological Differences between Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Collecting Duct Carcinoma, and Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma(Wolters Kluwer, 2018-03) Ohe, Chisato; Smith, Steven C.; Sirohi, Deepika; Divatia, Mukul; de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza; Paner, Gladell P.; Agaimy, Abbas; Amin, Mitual B.; Argani, Pedram; Chen, Ying-Bei; Cheng, Liang; Colecchia, Maurizio; Compérat, Eva; Werneck da Cunha, Isabela; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Gill, Anthony J.; Hes, Ondřej; Hirsch, Michelle; Jochum, Wolfram; Kunju, Lakshmi P.; Maclean, Fiona; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; McKenney, Jesse K.; Mehra, Rohit; Nesi, Gabriella; Osunkoya, Adeboye O.; Picken, Maria M.; Rao, Priya; Reuter, Victor E.; Guilherme de Oliveira Salles, Paulo; Schultz, Luciana; Tickoo, Satish K.; Tomlins, Scott A.; Trpkov, Kiril; Amin, Mahul B.; Medicine, School of MedicineRenal medullary carcinomas (RMCs) and collecting duct carcinomas (CDCs) are rare subsets of lethal high-stage, high-grade distal nephron-related adenocarcinomas with a predilection for the renal medullary region. Recent findings have established an emerging group of fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient tumors related to hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC-RCCs) syndrome within this morphologic spectrum. Recently developed, reliable ancillary testing has enabled consistent separation between these tumor types. Here, we present the clinicopathologic features and differences in the morphologic patterns between RMC, CDC, and FH-deficient RCC in consequence of these recent developments. This study included a total of 100 cases classified using contemporary criteria and ancillary tests. Thirty-three RMCs (SMARCB1/INI1-deficient, hemoglobinopathy), 38 CDCs (SMARCB1/INI1-retained), and 29 RCCs defined by the FH-deficient phenotype (FH/2SC or FH/2SC with FH mutation, regardless of HLRCC syndromic stigmata/history) were selected. The spectrum of morphologic patterns was critically evaluated, and the differences between the morphologic patterns present in the 3 groups were analyzed statistically. Twenty-five percent of cases initially diagnosed as CDC were reclassified as FH-deficient RCC on the basis of our contemporary diagnostic approach. Among the different overlapping morphologic patterns, sieve-like/cribriform and reticular/yolk sac tumor-like patterns favored RMCs, whereas intracystic papillary and tubulocystic patterns favored FH-deficient RCC. The tubulopapillary pattern favored both CDCs and FH-deficient RCCs, and the multinodular infiltrating papillary pattern favored CDCs. Infiltrating glandular and solid sheets/cords/nested patterns were not statistically different among the 3 groups. Viral inclusion-like macronucleoli, considered as a hallmark of HLRCC-RCCs, were observed significantly more frequently in FH-deficient RCCs. Despite the overlapping morphology found among these clinically aggressive infiltrating high-grade adenocarcinomas of the kidney, reproducible differences in morphology emerged between these categories after rigorous characterization. Finally, we recommend that definitive diagnosis of CDC should only be made if RMC and FH-deficient RCC are excluded.