Browsing by Author "Colwell, Rita R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    One Health, climate change, and infectious microbes: a joint effort between AGU and ASM to understand impacts of changing climate and microbes on human well-being across scales
    (American Society for Microbiology, 2024) Jutla, Antarpreet; Filippelli, Gabriel M.; McMahon, Katherine D.; Tringe, Susannah G.; Colwell, Rita R.; Nguyen, Helen; Imperiale, Michael J.; Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Science
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Thank You to Our 2020 Peer Reviewers
    (Wiley, 2020-03) Filippelli, Gabriel; Colwell, Rita R.; Anenberg, Susan; Balbus, John; Ceccarelli, Daniela; Hudson‐Edwards, Karen A.; Jutla, Antarpreet; Miao, Chiyuan; Sandifer, Paul A.; Vengosh, Avner; Earth Sciences, School of Science
    Peer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2019, GeoHealth benefited from more than 94 reviews provided by 73 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers
    (Wiley, 2023-05-21) Filippelli, Gabriel; Colwell, Rita R.; Anenberg, Susan; Ceccarelli, Daniela; Franklin, Meredith; Dey, Sagnik; Hudson-Edwards, Karen A.; Jutla, Antarpreet; Miao, Chiyuan; Paytan, Adina; Vengosh, Avner; Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Science
    Peer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2022, GeoHealth benefited from 333 reviews provided by 245 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society. Thank you to the 245 reviewers who submitted 333 reviews in the journal last year. Individuals in italics provided two or more reviews for GeoHealth during the year.