Browsing by Author "Coleman-Phox, Kimberly"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Feasibility and acceptability of chaplain decision coaching on Periviable resuscitation decision quality: A pilot study
    (Elsevier, 2024-02-21) Varner-Perez, Shelley E.; Hoffman, Shelley M.; Coleman-Phox, Kimberly; Bhamidipalli, Sruthi; Monahan, Patrick O.; Kuppermann, Miriam; Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Objective: To pilot test and assess the feasibility and acceptability of chaplain-led decision coaching alongside the GOALS (Getting Optimal Alignment around Life Support) decision support tool to enhance decision-making in threatened periviable delivery. Methods: Pregnant people admitted for threatened periviable delivery and their 'important other' (IO) were enrolled. Decisional conflict, acceptability, and knowledge were measured before and after the intervention. Chaplains journaled their impressions of training and coaching encounters. Descriptive analysis and conventional content analysis were completed. Results: Eight pregnant people and two IOs participated. Decisional conflict decreased by a mean of 6.7 (SD = 9.4) and knowledge increased by a mean of 1.4 (SD = 1.8). All rated their experience as "good" or "excellent," and the amount of information was "just right." Participants found it "helpful to have someone to talk to" and noted chaplains helped them reach a decision. Chaplains found the intervention a valuable use of their time and skillset. Conclusion: This is the first small-scale pilot study to utilize chaplains as decision coaches. Our results suggest that chaplain coaching with a decision support tool is feasible and well-accepted by parents and chaplains. Innovations: Our findings recognize chaplains as an underutilized, yet practical resource in value-laden clinical decision-making.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    User-testing of a decision-support tool for parents facing threatened periviable delivery: The Periviable GOALS decision aid
    (Elsevier, 2021-06) Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Hoffman, Shelley A.; Laitano, Tatiana; Coleman-Phox, Kimberly; Castillo, Esperanza; Kuppermann, Miriam; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Background To report user-centered design methods and stakeholder acceptability ratings of the Periviable GOALS (Getting Optimal Alignment around Life Support) decision aid (DA). Methods ‘Experienced’ and ‘expectant’ mothers engaged in content and design refining sessions. Five videos (10 families) were embedded in the DA to highlight life after delivery. User-testing sessions were conducted with mothers and providers to assess acceptability. End-user testing was conducted with hospitalized women facing potential periviable delivery to assess acceptability and feasibility in the clinical setting. Results 108 participants engaged in sessions from July 2017-January 2020. Twenty-seven refining sessions resulted in a DA providing survival estimates, neonatal outcomes descriptions, and values clarification exercises. Five white and five black women participated in the videos; six having surviving children (ages 16 months-4 years). Twelve mothers, 16 providers, and six hospitalized women evaluated acceptability. 95.1 % found the content “just right,” 94.9 % rated the videos “good” or “excellent,” and 97.2 % believed GOALS would support families in periviable decision-making. Conclusion Our results highlight the importance of developing a DA that is acceptable for patient use with direct involvement of stakeholders.