Browsing by Author "Coffee, R. Lane, Jr."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Time to Analgesia in Patients With Sickle Cell and Vaso-Occlusive Crisis: A Population With Disparities in Treatment
    (Springer Nature, 2022-09-25) Arnold, Tyler; Coffee, R. Lane, Jr.; Rosenberg, Leon; Jacob, Seethal A.; Thompson, Sean; Saavedra, Heather; Cico, Stephen John; Wagers, Brian; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) are the leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Timely administration of analgesia, within 60 minutes of patient registration, is the standard of care for SCD patients with VOCs. Patients with VOCs have longer times to initial analgesia compared to similar painful conditions. The primary aim of the project is to have 75% of patients with VOCs receive initial analgesia within 60 minutes of being registered, the current recommended time frame from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Methods: A multi-disciplinary team used quality improvement (QI) methodology to develop a plan involving multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. A rapid evaluation process was employed which included notification of a patient with a VOC being placed in a room, rapid evaluation by all team members and use of an electronic order set. Results: The aim was met 72% of the time during our intervention period, compared to 17% pre-intervention. Average time to initial analgesia was decreased from 61 minutes to 42 minutes (p-value < 0.001), while time to disposition was also decreased when time goals were achieved. Conclusion: Using a rapid evaluation process we were able to decrease time to initial analgesia in a patient population that has previously experienced delays in care and decrease overall time to disposition.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Advancing medical technology innovation and clinical translation via a model of industry-enabled technical and educational support: Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute’s Medical Technology Advance Program
    (Cambridge University Press, 2021-01-19) Brightman, Andrew O.; Coffee, R. Lane, Jr.; Garcia, Kara; Lottes, Aaron E.; Sors, Thomas G.; Moe, Sharon M.; Wodika, George R.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The success rate for translation of newly engineered medical technologies into clinical practice is low. Traversing the “translational valleys of death” requires a high level of knowledge of the complex landscape of technical, ethical, regulatory, and commercialization challenges along a multi-agency path of approvals. The Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute developed a program targeted at increasing that success rate through comprehensive training, education, and resourcing. The Medical Technology Advance Program (MTAP) provides technical, educational, and consultative assistance to investigators that leverages partnerships with experts in the health products industry to speed progress toward clinical implementation. The training, resourcing, and guidance are integrated through the entire journey of medical technology translation. Investigators are supported through a set of courses that cover bioethics, ethical engineering, preclinical and clinical study design, regulatory submissions, entrepreneurship, and commercialization. In addition to the integrated technical and educational resources, program experts provide direct consultation for planning each phase along the life cycle of translation. Since 2008, nearly 200 investigators have gained assistance from MTAP resulting in over 100 publications and patents. This support via medicine–engineering–industry partnership provides a unique and novel opportunity to expedite new medical technologies into clinical and product implementation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Identification of Bias in Ordering Further Imaging in Ethnic Groups With Indeterminate Ultrasound for Appendicitis
    (Springer Nature, 2022-08-17) Desai, Puja; Haut, Lindsey; Wagers, Brian; Coffee, R. Lane, Jr.; Kelker, Heather; Wyderko, Michael; Sarmiento, Elisa J.; Kanis, Jessica; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Recent studies have shown a higher incidence of complications from acute appendicitis in Hispanic populations. Hispanic ethnicity alone has been shown to be a risk factor. In contrast, one study found little evidence of racial disparities in complication rates. The objective of this study was to identify physician bias regarding whether ethnicity drives further testing after initial radiologic imaging has been obtained in the evaluation of appendicitis in our pediatric emergency department (PED). The use of computed tomography (CT) scan in the diagnosis of appendicitis was compared between Hispanic versus non-Hispanic populations when ultrasound (US) was indeterminate. Methodology: This is a retrospective cohort study of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients aged 2-18 who presented to the PED with right lower quadrant abdominal pain over a one-year period (January 1, 2017 to December 29, 2017). Both groups were subdivided into positive, negative, or indeterminate US findings for appendicitis. Each subgroup was analyzed based on those who had CT imaging done. Results: A total of 471 ultrasounds were performed, 162 Hispanic and 309 non-Hispanic patients. Indeterminate US scans were documented in 90/162 (56%) Hispanic versus 155/309 (50%) non-Hispanic patients. Of those with indeterminate US scans, 30% Hispanic versus 32% non-Hispanic patients received CT scans. Negative US scans were documented in 54/162 (33%) Hispanic versus 102/309 (33%) non-Hispanic patients. Of those with negative US scans, 7% Hispanic versus 5% non-Hispanic patients received CT scans. Chi-square analysis comparing both the proportion of CT scans received for indeterminate US scans (p=0.71) and negative US scans (p=0.52) showed no statistical significance. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the number of CT scans ordered for indeterminate US scans between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. One can infer that there is no inherent bias toward ordering advanced imaging in Hispanic children based on ethnicity alone.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Immunization Status and the Management of Febrile Children in the Pediatric Emergency Department: What Are We Doing?
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Curtis, Molly; Kanis, Jessica; Wagers, Brian; Coffee, R. Lane, Jr.; Sarmiento, Elisa; Grout, Sarah; Johnson, Olivia; DiGregory, Sydney; Grout, Randall; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Objectives: Widespread Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae immunization has decreased occult bacteremia and bacterial meningitis rates. Practice has evolved in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) to favor fewer diagnostic tests for and empiric treatment of invasive bacterial infection. We lack evidence-based guidance on evaluation and treatment of unimmunized (UnI) or underimmunized (UnderI) febrile children. This study aims to determine how parental report of immunization status in febrile PED patients impacts rates of diagnostic testing, interventions, and hospital admissions. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with chart review of encounters of children aged 3 to 36 months presenting to an academic, tertiary care PED in 2019 using International Classification of Diseases-10 code for fever (R50.9). Inclusion criteria were documented fever of 38°C and higher and well appearance. Encounters were excluded if there was a history of chronic illness or documentation of ill appearance or hemodynamic instability. Encounters were grouped by provider-documented immunization status. Fischer exact test and logistic regression compared rates of diagnostic testing (serum, urine or cerebrospinal fluid laboratory studies, and chest radiographs), interventions (intravenous fluid bolus, intravenous antibiotic or steroid administration, respiratory support, or breathing treatment), and hospital admissions between UnderI, UnI, and fully immunized (FI) groups. Results: Of the 1813 encounters reviewed, 1093 (60%) included provider-documented immunization status and 788 (43%) met final inclusion criteria: 23 (2.1%) UnI, 44 (5.8%) UnderI, and 721 (92.1%) FI. The UnderI and UnI children experienced significantly higher rates of laboratory evaluation including complete blood count and blood culture, medical intervention, and antibiotic prescriptions while in the PED. No significant differences were observed for rates of chest radiographs, hospital admissions, or 72-hour PED return visits. Conclusions: Higher rates of laboratory testing and interventions were observed in UnderI and UnI versus FI febrile patients at a PED, likely demonstrating increased clinical suspicion for invasive bacterial infection in this group despite lacking national guidelines. Given continued vaccine hesitancy, further studies are needed for guiding management of febrile UnI and UnderI children presenting for emergency care.