ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Coan, Lorinda"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Continuing Education on Clinicians' Self- Reported Knowledge of Tobacco Dependence and Tobacco Control Interventions
    (JScholar, 2018-10-20) Romito, Laura M.; Coan, Lorinda; Department of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, School of Dentistry
    Purpose: To assess a tobacco cessation continuing education (CE) program for Indiana dental and medical providers. Methods: A 26-item immediate post-CE survey and a 19-item 3-month follow-up survey assessed changes in participants’ self-reported knowledge of tobacco dependence and tobacco control interventions. De-identified data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation coefficients, and Mantel- Haenszel chi-square tests. Results: Participants totaled 252 across 6 programs statewide. Immediate post-CE course survey response was 98.4% (N=248): dental assistants (2%), dental hygienists (83%), dentists (8.5%), and other healthcare professionals (6.45%). Participants reported less knowledge before than immediately after CE (p< .0001) and 3 months after (p<.0001). Reported knowledge at 3 months was less than after CE (p< .002). Participants reported on their intention to apply program communication strategies (99%), implement brief tobacco interventions (85%), and refer patients to local cessation resources (95%), Indiana Quitline (96%). Follow-up survey response rate was 54% (N=136). Participants reported active engagement in tobacco interventions (48%, 78), applying CE communication strategies (85%, 109), and implementing brief interventions (71%, 90). Participants reported referring few patients to local or state quitline counselors. Conclusion:Tobacco dependence CE may enhance health care practitioners’ knowledge and willingness to integrate tobacco interventions in their healthcare settings but it does not ensure a change in clinical tobacco control interventions
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University