Browsing by Author "Clements, Mark A."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    High residual C-peptide likely contributes to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes
    (American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2020-01-02) Rickels, Michael R.; Evans-Molina, Carmella; Bahnson, Henry T.; Ylescupidez, Alyssa; Nadeau, Kristen J.; Hao, Wei; Clements, Mark A.; Sherr, Jennifer L.; Pratley, Richard E.; Hannon, Tamara S.; Shah, Viral N.; Miller, Kellee M.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND Residual C-peptide is detected in many people for years following the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes; however, the physiologic significance of low levels of detectable C-peptide is not known. METHODS We studied 63 adults with type 1 diabetes classified by peak mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) C-peptide as negative (<0.007 pmol/mL; n = 15), low (0.017–0.200; n = 16), intermediate (>0.200–0.400; n = 15), or high (>0.400; n = 17). We compared the groups’ glycemia from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), β cell secretory responses from a glucose-potentiated arginine (GPA) test, insulin sensitivity from a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic (EU) clamp, and glucose counterregulatory responses from a subsequent hypoglycemic (HYPO) clamp. RESULTS Low and intermediate MMTT C-peptide groups did not exhibit β cell secretory responses to hyperglycemia, whereas the high C-peptide group showed increases in both C-peptide and proinsulin (P ≤ 0.01). All groups with detectable MMTT C-peptide demonstrated acute C-peptide and proinsulin responses to arginine that were positively correlated with peak MMTT C-peptide (P < 0.0001 for both analytes). During the EU-HYPO clamp, C-peptide levels were proportionately suppressed in the low, intermediate, and high C-peptide compared with the negative group (P ≤ 0.0001), whereas glucagon increased from EU to HYPO only in the high C-peptide group compared with negative (P = 0.01). CGM demonstrated lower mean glucose and more time in range for the high C-peptide group. CONCLUSION These results indicate that in adults with type 1 diabetes, β cell responsiveness to hyperglycemia and α cell responsiveness to hypoglycemia are observed only at high levels of residual C-peptide that likely contribute to glycemic control. FUNDING Funding for this work was provided by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Predictors of Lost to Follow-Up among Children with Type 2 Diabetes
    (Karger, 2017-07) Shoemaker, Ashley; Cheng, Peiyao; Gal, Robin L.; Kollman, Craig; Tamborlane, William V.; Klingensmith, Georgeanna J.; Clements, Mark A.; Hannon, Tamara S.; Heptulla, Rubina; Less, Joane; Wood, Jamie; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background/Aims: Youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have poor compliance with medical care. This study aimed to determine which demographic and clinical factors differ between youth with T2D who receive care in a pediatric diabetes center versus youth lost to follow-up for >18 months. Methods: Data were analyzed from 496 subjects in the Pe­diatric Diabetes Consortium registry. Enrollment variables were selected a priori and analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: After a median of 1.3 years from enrollment, 55% of patients were lost to follow-up. The final model included age, race/ethnicity, parent education, and estimated distance to study site. The odds ratio (99% confidence interval) of loss to follow-up was 2.87 (1.34, 6.16) for those aged 15 to <18 years versus those aged 10 to <13 years and 6.57 (2.67, 16.15) for those aged ≥18 years versus those aged 10 to <13 years. Among patients living more than 50 miles from the clinic, the odds ra tio of loss to follow-up was 3.11 (1.14, 8.49) versus those living within 5 miles of the site. Conclusion: Older adolescents with T2D are more likely to be lost to follow-up, but other socioeconomic factors were not significant predictors of clinic follow-up.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018
    (Liebert, 2019-02) Foster, Nicole C.; Beck, Roy W.; Miller, Kellee M.; Clements, Mark A.; Rickels, Michael R.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Maahs, David M.; Tamborlane, William V.; Bergenstal, Richard; Smith, Elizabeth; Olson, Beth A.; Garg, Satish K.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objective: To provide a snapshot of the profile of adults and youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States and assessment of longitudinal changes in T1D management and clinical outcomes in the T1D Exchange registry. Research Design and Methods: Data on diabetes management and outcomes from 22,697 registry participants (age 1–93 years) were collected between 2016 and 2018 and compared with data collected in 2010–2012 for 25,529 registry participants. Results: Mean HbA1c in 2016–2018 increased from 65 mmol/mol at the age of 5 years to 78 mmol/mol between ages 15 and 18, with a decrease to 64 mmol/mol by age 28 and 58–63 mmol/mol beyond age 30. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) HbA1c goal of <58 mmol/mol for youth was achieved by only 17% and the goal of <53 mmol/mol for adults by only 21%. Mean HbA1c levels changed little between 2010–2012 and 2016–2018, except in adolescents who had a higher mean HbA1c in 2016–2018. Insulin pump use increased from 57% in 2010–2012 to 63% in 2016–2018. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) increased from 7% in 2010–2012 to 30% in 2016–2018, rising >10-fold in children <12 years old. HbA1c levels were lower in CGM users than nonusers. Severe hypoglycemia was most frequent in participants ≥50 years old and diabetic ketoacidosis was most common in adolescents and young adults. Racial differences were evident in use of pumps and CGM and HbA1c levels. Conclusions: Data from the T1D Exchange registry demonstrate that only a minority of adults and youth with T1D in the United States achieve ADA goals for HbA1c.