Browsing by Author "Chugh, Ankur"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Celiac disease in North America: What is the current practice of pediatric gastroenterology providers?
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2024-05-27) Singh, Arunjot; Silvester, Jocelyn; Turner, Justine; Absah, Imad; Sparks, Brandon A.; Walsh, Catharine M.; Bracken, Julia M.; Stanisz, Joanna; Hajjat, Temara; Badalyan, Vahe; Chugh, Ankur; Hoffenberg, Edward J.; Dowhaniuk, Jenna K.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objectives: While guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of pediatric celiac disease (CeD), current practices in North America are not well-described. This study aimed to explore current practice patterns to identify gaps and direct future clinical, training and research initiatives. Methods: A 23-item survey designed by the Celiac Disease Special Interest Group was distributed electronically to its members. Questions explored four themes: (1) screening and diagnosis pre and post the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic, (2) treatment and monitoring, (3) family screening and transition of care, and (4) CeD focused training. Results: The survey response rate was 10.8% (278/2552). Most respondents were from the United States (89.9%, n = 250) and Canada (8.6%, n = 24). While endoscopy remained the gold standard, serology-based diagnosis was accepted by 47.5% (132/278). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 37.4% of providers changed their diagnostic practice. Barriers to care included: lack of insurance coverage for dietitians, wait times, and lack of CeD focused training. During fellowship 69.1% (192/278) reported no focused CeD training. Conclusion: Survey results revealed practice variation regarding the diagnosis and management of CeD in North America including a substantial proportion accepting non-biopsy, serology-based diagnosis, which increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Variations in screening, diagnosis, interval surveillance, and family screening were also identified. Dedicated CeD education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowship may be an opportunity for standardizing practice and advancing research. Future North American guidelines should take current care patterns into consideration and develop new initiatives to improve care of children with CeD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pediatric Drug-Associated Pancreatitis Reveals Concomitant Risk Factors and Poor Reliability of Causality Scoring: Report From INSPPIRE
    (Wiley, 2023) Morinville, Veronique D.; Husain, Sohail Z.; Wang, Fuchenchu; Cress, Gretchen A.; Abu-El-Haija, Maisam; Chugh, Ankur; Downs, Elissa; Ellery, Kate; Fishman, Douglas S.; Freeman, Alvin Jay; Gariepy, Cheryl E.; Giefer, Matthew; Gonska, Tanja; Liu, Quin; Maqbool, Asim; Mark, Jacob; Mcferron, Brian Arthur; Mehta, Megha; Nathan, Jaimie D.; Ng, Ken; Ooi, Chee Y.; Perito, Emily; Ruan, Wenly; Schwarzenberg, Sarah Jane; Sellers, Zachary M.; Serrano, Jose; Troendle, David M.; Wilschanski, Michael; Zheng, Yuhua; Yuan, Ying; Lowe, Mark; Uc, Aliye; Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreatic Cancer (CPDPC); Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objectives: Drug-associated acute pancreatitis (DAP) studies typically focus on single acute pancreatitis (AP) cases. We aimed to analyze the (1) characteristics, (2) co-risk factors, and (3) reliability of the Naranjo scoring system for DAP using INSPPIRE-2 (the INternational Study group of Pediatric Pancreatitis: In search for a cuRE-2) cohort study of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) in children. Methods: Data were obtained from ARP group with ≥1 episode of DAP and CP group with medication exposure ± DAP. Physicians could report multiple risk factors. Pancreatitis associated with Medication (Med) (ARP+CP) was compared to Non-Medication cases, and ARP-Med vs CP-Med groups. Naranjo score was calculated for each DAP episode. Results: Of 726 children, 392 had ARP and 334 had CP; 51 children (39 ARP and 12 CP) had ≥1 AP associated with a medication; 61% had ≥1 AP without concurrent medication exposure. The Med group had other risk factors present (where tested): 10 of 35 (28.6%) genetic, 1 of 48 (2.1%) autoimmune pancreatitis, 13 of 51 (25.5%) immune-mediated conditions, 11 of 50 (22.0%) obstructive/anatomic, and 28 of 51 (54.9%) systemic risk factors. In Med group, 24 of 51 (47%) had involvement of >1 medication, simultaneously or over different AP episodes. There were 20 ARP and 4 CP cases in "probable" category and 19 ARP and 7 CP in "possible" category by Naranjo scores. Conclusions: Medications were involved in 51 of 726 (7%) of ARP or CP patients in INSPPIRE-2 cohort; other pancreatitis risk factors were present in most, suggesting a potential additive role of different risks. The Naranjo scoring system failed to identify any cases as "definitive," raising questions about its reliability for DAP.