Browsing by Author "Chinthala, Anoop Sai"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Advances in Coccygectomy: A Comprehensive Review Evaluating Surgical Techniques for Coccygodynia
    (MDPI, 2025-02-19) Obeng-Gyasi, Barnabas; Brown, Ethan D. L.; Chinthala, Anoop Sai; Mao, Gordon; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Coccygodynia presents significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment. While coccygectomy has emerged as a crucial intervention for refractory cases, significant heterogeneity exists in surgical techniques. Traditional approaches are increasingly complemented by novel methods, necessitating a comprehensive review of current surgical options. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase databases from inception to present. Search terms included "coccygectomy", "coccydynia", "coccygodynia", "coccyx pain" and "tailbone pain". We analyzed peer-reviewed studies focusing on surgical techniques, outcomes and complications of coccygectomy. Studies were excluded if non-peer-reviewed, non-English without translation, or not directly addressing surgical management. Results: Traditional midline approaches, while common, demonstrate increased wound complications compared to paramedian techniques. Minimally invasive methods, including coccygeoplasty and endoscopic coccygectomy, show promising early outcomes with reduced recovery times. Both partial and complete resections provide significant pain relief, with complete resection potentially offering superior results in severe cases. Wound closure technique significantly impacts surgical success. Conclusions: Optimal outcomes in coccygectomy require individualized surgical approaches incorporating modern techniques like paramedian incision and advanced wound closure. Emerging minimally invasive procedures may further reduce complications and enhance recovery. Treatment success depends on careful patient selection and surgical technique optimization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Management of Type III Occipital Condyle Fractures
    (MDPI, 2024-12-15) Kwon, Jae Hyun; Chinthala, Anoop Sai; Arnold, Jonathan C.; Witten, Andrew J.; Bohnstedt, Bradley N.; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background/Objectives: Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) can be seen in around 4-19% of patients who suffer from cervical spine trauma. Anderson and Montesano system type III OCFs, which are avulsion fractures, are potentially unstable and operative. This study evaluates the management of type III OCFs at our institution over a 22-year period. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed all cases of type III OCFs at our institution from July 2001 to March 2023, identified via imaging reports. Using the in-house radiology imaging informatics system "Doris" (Dig Our Radiology Information System), reports containing the terms subluxation, avulsion, unstable, or type 3/III with occipital condyle, occipital condylar, occipital fx, or occipital fracture were collected. We also searched for Montesano type III/3 fracture. Electronic medical records were used to collect clinical and demographic data. Patients evaluated by the neurosurgical team with at least 1 month of follow-up were included in the analysis. Results: A total of 563 patients were identified with type III OCFs. A total of 56 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority (91%, 51/56) were treated conservatively with cervical orthosis. A small subset (8.9%, 5/56) underwent occipito-cervical fusion. Three had concomitant unstable C1 fractures, while the other two had significant coronal deformity associated with their type III OCF. Conclusions: At our institution, type III OCFs are predominantly managed with cervical orthosis. Only those with an associated malalignment of the occipito-cervical joint underwent fusion. These findings suggest that most type III OCFs can be treated conservatively with orthosis once stability is confirmed with an upright radiograph.