Browsing by Author "Chhabra, Saurabh"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Age is no barrier for adults undergoing HCT for AML in CR1: contemporary CIBMTR analysis(Springer Nature, 2022) Maakaron, Joseph E.; Zhang, Mei-Jie; Chen, Karen; Abhyankar, Sunil; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Chhabra, Saurabh; El Jurdi, Najla; Farag, Sherif S.; He, Fiona; Juckett, Mark; de Lima, Marcos; Majhail, Navneet; van der Poel, Marjolein; Saad, Ayman; Savani, Bipin; Ustun, Celalettin; Waller, Edmund K.; Litzow, Mark; Kebriaei, Partow; Hourigan, Christopher S.; Saber, Wael; Weisdorf, Daniel; Medicine, School of MedicineAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) has a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. The most common curative therapy remains an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), yet it is complicated by treatment-related mortality (TRM) and ongoing morbidity including graft versus host disease (GVHD) that may impact survival, particularly in older patients. We examined the outcomes and predictors of success in 1321 patients aged 60 years and older receiving a HCT for AML in first complete remission (CR1) from 2007-2017 and reported to the CIBMTR. Outcomes were compared in three age cohorts (60-64; 65-69; 70+). With median follow-up of nearly 3 years, patients aged 60-64 had modestly, though significantly better OS, DFS and lower TRM than those either 65-69 or 70+; cohorts with similar outcomes. Three-year OS for the 3 cohorts was 49.4%, 42.3%, and 44.7% respectively (p = 0.026). TRM was higher with increasing age, cord blood as graft source and HCT-CI score of ≥3. Conditioning intensity was not a significant predictor of OS in the 60-69 cohort with 3-year OS of 46% for RIC and 49% for MAC (p = 0.38); MAC was rarely used over age 70. There was no difference in the relapse rate, incidence of Grade III/IV acute GVHD, or moderate-severe chronic GVHD across the age cohorts. After adjusting for other predictors, age had a small effect on OS and TRM. High-risk features including poor cytogenetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HCT were each significantly associated with relapse and accounted for most of the adverse impact on OS and DFS. Age did not influence the incidence of either acute or chronic GVHD; while graft type and associated GVHD prophylaxis were most important. These data suggest that age alone is not a barrier to successful HCT for AML in CR1 and should not exclude patients from HCT. Efforts should focus on minimizing residual disease and better donor selection.Item Age no Bar – a CIBMTR analysis of Elderly Patients undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma(Wiley, 2020) Munshi, Pashna N.; Vesole, David; Jurczyszyn, Artur; Zaucha, Jan Maciej; St. Martin, Andrew; Davila, Omar; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Badawy, Sherif M.; Battiwalla, Minoo; Chhabra, Saurabh; Copelan, Edward; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Farhadfar, Nosha; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Hashmi, Shahrukh; Krem, Maxwell M.; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Malek, Ehsan; Meehan, Kenneth; Murthy, Hemant S.; Nishihori, Taiga; Olin, Rebecca L.; Olsson, Richard F.; Schriber, Jeffrey; Seo, Sachiko; Shah, Gunjan; Solh, Melhem; Tay, Jason; Kumar, Shaji; Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.; Shah, Nina; Hari, Parameswaran N.; D'Souza, Anita; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) remains an important therapy in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), a disease of older adults. Methods: The authors investigated the outcomes of AHCT in patients with MM who were aged ≥70 years. The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database registered 15,999 patients with MM in the United States within 12 months of diagnosis during 2013 through 2017; a total of 2092 patients were aged ≥70 years. Nonrecurrence mortality (NRM), disease recurrence and/or progression (relapse; REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modeled using Cox proportional hazards models with age at transplantation as the main effect. Because of the large sample size, a P value <.01 was considered to be statistically significant a priori. Results: An increase in AHCT was noted in 2017 (28%) compared with 2013 (15%) among patients aged ≥70 years. Although approximately 82% of patients received melphalan (Mel) at a dose of 200 mg/m2 overall, 58% of the patients aged ≥70 years received Mel at a dose of 140 mg/m2 . On multivariate analysis, patients aged ≥70 years demonstrated no difference with regard to NRM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3; 99% confidence interval [99% CI], 1-1.7 [P = .06]), REL (HR, 1.03; 99% CI, 0.9-1.1 [P = 0.6]), PFS (HR, 1.06; 99% CI, 1-1.2 [P = 0.2]), and OS (HR, 1.2; 99% CI, 1-1.4 [P = .02]) compared with the reference group (those aged 60-69 years). In patients aged ≥70 years, Mel administered at a dose of 140 mg/m2 was found to be associated with worse outcomes compared with Mel administered at a dose of 200 mg/m2 , including day 100 NRM (1% [95% CI, 1%-2%] vs 0% [95% CI, 0%-1%]; P = .003]), 2-year PFS (64% [95% CI, 60%-67%] vs 69% [95% CI, 66%-73%]; P = .003), and 2-year OS (85% [95% CI, 82%-87%] vs 89% [95% CI, 86%-91%]; P = .01]), likely representing frailty. Conclusions: The results of the current study demonstrated that AHCT remains an effective consolidation therapy among patients with MM across all age groups.Item Breaking the Age Barrier: Physicians' Perceptions of Candidacy for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Older Adults(Elsevier, 2021) Mishra, Asmita; Preussler, Jaime M.; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Bredeson, Christopher; Chhabra, Saurabh; D'Souza, Anita; Dahi, Parastoo B.; Danaher Hacker, Eileen; Gowda, Lohith; Hashmi, Shahrukh K.; Howard, Dianna S.; Jakubowski, Ann; Jayani, Reena; Koll, Thuy; Olin, Rebecca L.; Popat, Uday R.; Rodriguez, Cesar; Rosko, Ashley; Sabloff, Mitchell; Sorror, Mohamed L.; Sung, Anthony D.; Ustun, Celalettin; Wood, William A.; Burns, Linda; Artz, Andrew; School of NursingBackground: Despite continued increases in use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) among older adults, no standardized geriatric assessment (GA) has been established to risk-stratify for transplant-related morbidity. We conducted a survey of transplant physicians to determine perceptions of the impact of older age (≥60 years) on alloHCT candidacy, and utilization of tools to gauge candidacy. Methods: We conducted a 23-item, online cross-sectional survey of HCT physicians caring for adults in the United States between May and July 2019. Results: Of the 770 invited HCT physicians, 175 (22.7%) completed the survey. The majority of respondents were 41–60 years old, male, and practiced in a higher volume teaching hospital. When considering regimen intensity, 29 physicians (17%) stated they would consider a myeloablative regimen for patients ≥70 years, and 141 (82%) would consider reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning for patients ≥70 years. Almost all (90%) endorsed the need for a specialized assessment of pre-HCT vulnerabilities to guide candidacy decisions for older adults. Most physicians reported their centers rarely (33%) or never (46%) utilize a dedicated geriatrician/geriatric-oncologist to assess alloHCT candidates ≥60 years. Common barriers to performing a GA included uncertainty about which tools to use, lack of knowledge and training, and lack of appropriate clinical support staff. Conclusions: Many alloHCT physicians will consider alloHCT in patients up to age 75 years and not uncommonly, in patients older than that. However, application of tools and domains varies widely to assess candidacy in older adults. Incorporation of a standardized pre-transplant health assessment tool for risk stratification is a significant unmet need.Item Composite GRFS and CRFS Outcomes After Adult Alternative Donor HCT(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020-06-20) Mehta, Rohtesh S.; Holtan, Shernan G.; Wang, Tao; Hemmer, Michael T.; Spellman, Stephen R.; Arora, Mukta; Couriel, Daniel R.; Alousi, Amin M.; Pidala, Joseph; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Ahmed, Ibrahim A.; Al-Homsi, Samer; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Antin, Joseph H.; Askar, Medhat; Auletta, Jeffery J.; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Chee, Lynette; Chhabra, Saurabh; Daly, Andrew; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gajewski, James; Gale, Robert Peter; Gergis, Usama; Hematti, Peiman; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Hogan, William J.; Inamoto, Yoshihiro; Martino, Rodrigo; Majhail, Navneet S.; Marks, David I.; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Pawarode, Attaphol; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Prestidge, Tim; Rangarajan, Hemalatha G.; Ringden, Olle; Saad, Ayman; Savani, Bipin N.; Schoemans, Hélène; Seo, Sachiko; Schultz, Kirk R.; Solh, Melhem; Spitzer, Thomas; Storek, Jan; Teshima, Takanori; Verdonck, Leo F.; Wirk, Baldeep; Yared, Jean A.; Cahn, Jean-Yves; Weisdorf, Daniel J.; Medicine, School of MedicinePurpose: There is no consensus on the best choice of an alternative donor (umbilical cord blood [UCB], haploidentical, one-antigen mismatched [7/8]-bone marrow [BM], or 7/8-peripheral blood [PB]) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients lacking an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor. Methods: We report composite end points of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD)-free relapse-free survival (CRFS) in 2,198 patients who underwent UCB (n = 838), haploidentical (n = 159), 7/8-BM (n = 241), or 7/8-PB (n = 960) HCT. All groups were divided by myeloablative conditioning (MAC) intensity or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), except haploidentical group in which most received RIC. To account for multiple testing, P < .0071 in multivariable analysis and P < .00025 in direct pairwise comparisons were considered statistically significant. Results: In multivariable analysis, haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and overall survival (OS). In the direct pairwise comparison of other groups, among those who received MAC, there was no difference in GRFS or CRFS among UCB, 7/8-BM, and 7/8-PB with serotherapy (alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin) groups. In contrast, the 7/8-PB without serotherapy group had significantly inferior GRFS, higher cGVHD, and a trend toward worse CRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.69; P = .002) than the 7/8-BM group and higher cGVHD and trend toward inferior CRFS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.63; P = .0006) than the UCB group. Among patients with RIC, all groups had significantly inferior GRFS and CRFS compared with the haploidentical group. Conclusion: Recognizing the limitations of a registry retrospective analysis and the possibility of center selection bias in choosing donors, our data support the use of UCB, 7/8-BM, or 7/8-PB (with serotherapy) grafts for patients undergoing MAC HCT and haploidentical grafts for patients undergoing RIC HCT. The haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and OS of all groups.Item Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Fludarabine Improve Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes(Elsevier, 2021) Oran, Betül; Ahn, Kwang Woo; Fretham, Caitrin; Beitinjaneh, Amer; Bashey, Asad; Pawarode, Attaphol; Wirk, Baldeep; Scott, Bart L.; Savani, Bipin N.; Bredeson, Christopher; Weisdorf, Daniel; Marks, David I.; Rizzieri, David; Copelan, Edward; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Hale, Gregory A.; Murthy, Hemant S.; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Cerny, Jan; Liesveld, Jane L.; Yared, Jean A.; Yves-Cahn, Jean; Szer, Jeffrey; Verdonck, Leo F.; Aljur, Mahmoud; van der Poel, Marjolein; Litzow, Mark; Kalaycio, Matt; Grunwald, Michael R.; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Sabloff, Mitchell; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Majhail, Navneet S.; Farhadfar, Nosha; Reshef, Ran; Olsson, Richard F.; Gale, Robert Peter; Nakamura, Ryotaro; Seo, Sachiko; Chhabra, Saurabh; Hashmi, Shahrukh; Farhan, Shatha; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Nathan, Sunita; Nishihori, Taiga; Jain, Tania; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Bacher, Ulrike; Popat, Uday; Saber, Wael; Medicine, School of MedicineReduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens developed to extend the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to older patients have resulted in encouraging outcomes. We aimed to compare the 2 most commonly used RIC regimens, i.v. fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel), in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we identified 1045 MDS patients age ≥60 years who underwent first HSCT with a matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor using an RIC regimen. The CIBMTR's definition of RIC was used: a regimen that incorporated an i.v. busulfan total dose ≤7.2 mg/kg or a low-dose melphalan total dose ≤150 mg/m2. The 2 groups, recipients of FluBu (n = 697) and recipients of FluMel (n = 448), were comparable in terms of disease- and transplantation-related characteristics except for the more frequent use of antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab in the FluBu group (39% versus 31%). The median age was 67 years in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) compared with FluBu, with a 1-year adjusted incidence of 26% versus 44% (P ≤ .0001). Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the FluMel group (26% versus 16%; P ≤ .0001). Because the magnitude of improvement with FluMel in RI was greater than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was better at 1 year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% versus 40% at 1 year [P = .02] and 35% versus 27% at 3 years [P = .01]). Overall survival was comparable in the 2 groups at 1 year (63% versus 61%; P = .4) but was significantly improved with FluMel compared with FluBu at 3 years (46% versus 39%; P = .03). Our results suggest that FluMel is associated with superior DFS compared with FluBu owing to reduced RI in older patients with MDS patients.Item Impact of T Cell Dose on Outcome of T Cell-Replete HLA-Matched Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation(Elsevier, 2019) Saad, Ayman; Lamb, Lawrence; Wang, Tao; Hemmer, Michael T.; Spellman, Stephen; Couriel, Daniel; Alousi, Amin; Pidala, Joseph; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Beitinjaneh, Amer M.; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Buchbinder, David; Byrne, Michael; Cahn, Jean-Yves; Cairo, Mitchell; Castillo, Paul; Chhabra, Saurabh; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Farhan, Shatha; Floisand, Yngvar; Frangoul, Hadar A.; Gadalla, Shahinaz M.; Gajewski, James; Gale, Robert Peter; Gandhi, Manish; Gergis, Usama; Hamilton, Betty Ky; Hematti, Peiman; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Kamble, Rammurti T.; Kanate, Abraham S.; Khandelwal, Pooja; Lazaryn, Aleksandr; MacMillan, Margaret; Marks, David I.; Martino, Rodrigo; Mehta, Parinda A.; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Patel, Sagar S.; Qayed, Muna; Rangarajan, Hemalatha G.; Reshef, Ran; Ringden, Olle; Savani, Bipin N.; Schouten, Harry C.; Schultz, Kirk R.; Seo, Sachiko; Shaffer, Brian C.; Solh, Melhem; Teshima, Takanori; Urbano-Ispizua, Alvaro; Verdonck, Leo F.; Vij, Ravi; Waller, Edmund K.; William, Basem; Wirk, Baldeep; Yared, Jean A.; Yu, Lolie C.; Arora, Mukta; Hashmi, Shahrukh; Medicine, School of MedicineData on whether the T cell dose of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products influences transplantation outcomes are conflicting. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified 2736 adult patients who underwent first allogeneic PBSC transplantation for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome between 2008 and 2014 using an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) or an 8/8-matched unrelated donor (MUD). We excluded ex vivo and in vivo T cell-depleted transplantations. Correlative analysis was performed between CD3+ T cell dose and the risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Using maximum likelihood estimation, we identified CD3+ T cell dose cutoff that separated the risk of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV in both the MSD and MUD groups. A CD3+ T cell dose cutoff of 14 × 107 cells/kg identified MSD/low CD3+ (n = 223) and MSD/high CD3+ (n = 1214), and a dose of 15 × 107 cells/kg identified MUD/low CD3+ (n = 197) and MUD/high CD3+ (n = 1102). On univariate analysis, the MSD/high CD3+ group had a higher cumulative incidence of day +100 aGVHD grade II-IV compared with the MSD/low CD3+ group (33% versus 25%; P = .009). There were no differences between the 2 groups in engraftment rate, risk of aGVHD grade III-IV or chronic GVHD (cGVHD), NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. The MUD/high CD3+ group had a higher cumulative incidence of day +100 aGVHD grade II-IV compared with the MUD/low CD3+ group (49% versus 41%; P = .04). There were no differences between the 2 groups in engraftment rate, risk of severe aGVHD or cGVHD, NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. Multivariate analysis of the MSD and MUD groups failed to show an association between CD3+ T cell dose and the risk of either aGVHD grade II-IV (P = .10 and .07, respectively) or cGVHD (P = .80 and .30, respectively). Subanalysis of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio failed to identify cutoff values predictive of transplantation outcomes; however, using the log-rank test, the sample size was suboptimal for identifying a difference at this cutoff cell dose. In this registry study, the CD3+ T cell dose of PBSC products did not influence the risk of aGVHD or cGVHD or other transplantation outcomes when using an MSD or an 8/8-matched MUD. Subset analyses of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell doses were not possible given our small sample size.Item Risk Factors for Graft-versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide(Elsevier, 2020-08) Im, Annie; Rashidi, Armin; Wang, Tao; Hemmer, Michael; MacMillan, Margaret L.; Pidala, Joseph; Jagasia, Madan; Pavletic, Steven; Majhail, Navneet S.; Weisdorf, Daniel; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Al-Homsi, A. Samer; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Askar, Medhat; Auletta, Jeffery J.; Bashey, Asad; Beitinjaneh, Amer; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Byrne, Michael; Cahn, Jean-Yves; Cairo, Mitchell; Castillo, Paul; Cerny, Jan; Chhabra, Saurabh; Choe, Hannah; Ciurea, Stefan; Daly, Andrew; Perez, Miguel Angel Diaz; Farhadfar, Nosha; Gadalla, Shahinaz M.; Gale, Robert; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Gergis, Usama; Hanna, Rabi; Hematti, Peiman; Herzig, Roger; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Lad, Deepesh P.; Lee, Catherine; Lehmann, Leslie; Lekakis, Lazaros; Kamble, Rammurti T.; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Khandelwal, Pooja; Martino, Rodrigo; Murthy, Hemant S.; Nishihori, Taiga; O'Brien, Tracey A.; Olsson, Richard F.; Patel, Sagar S.; Perales, Miguel-Angel; Prestidge, Tim; Qayed, Muna; Romee, Rizwan; Schoemans, Hélène; Seo, Sachiko; Sharma, Akshay; Solh, Melhem; Strair, Roger; Teshima, Takanori; Urbano-Ispizua, Alvaro; Van der Poel, Marjolein; Vij, Ravi; Wagner, John L.; William, Basem; Wirk, Baldeep; Yared, Jean A.; Spellman, Steve R.; Arora, Mukta; Hamilton, Betty K.; Medicine, School of MedicinePost-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has significantly increased the successful use of haploidentical donors with a relatively low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Given its increasing use, we sought to determine risk factors for GVHD after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) using PTCy. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research on adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent PTCy-based haplo-HCT (2013 to 2016) were analyzed and categorized into 4 groups based on myeloablative (MA) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) graft source. In total, 646 patients were identified (MA-BM = 79, MA-PB = 183, RIC-BM = 192, RIC-PB = 192). The incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD at 6 months was highest in MA-PB (44%), followed by RIC-PB (36%), MA-BM (36%), and RIC-BM (30%) (P = .002). The incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 40%, 34%, 24%, and 20%, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, there was no impact of stem cell source or conditioning regimen on grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD; however, older donor age (30 to 49 versus <29 years) was significantly associated with higher rates of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 2.12; P = .01). In contrast, PB compared to BM as a stem cell source was a significant risk factor for the development of chronic GVHD (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.62; P = .01) in the RIC setting. There were no differences in relapse or overall survival between groups. Donor age and graft source are risk factors for acute and chronic GVHD, respectively, after PTCy-based haplo-HCT. Our results indicate that in RIC haplo-HCT, the risk of chronic GVHD is higher with PB stem cells, without any difference in relapse or overall survival.Item Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis(American Society of Hematology, 2020-05-08) Gowin, Krisstina; Ballen, Karen; Ahn, Kwang Woo; Hu, Zhen-Huan; Ali, Haris; Arcasoy, Murat O.; Devlin, Rebecca; Coakley, Maria; Gerds, Aaron T.; Green, Michael; Gupta, Vikas; Hobbs, Gabriela; Jain, Tania; Kandarpa, Malathi; Komrokji, Rami; Kuykendall, Andrew T.; Luber, Kierstin; Masarova, Lucia; Michaelis, Laura C.; Patches, Sarah; Pariser, Ashley C.; Rampal, Raajit; Stein, Brady; Talpaz, Moshe; Verstovsek, Srdan; Wadleigh, Martha; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Avalos, Belinda R.; Bacher, Ulrike; Bashey, Asad; Beitinjaneh, Amer M.; Cerny, Jan; Chhabra, Saurabh; Copelan, Edward; Cutler, Corey S.; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gadalla, Shahinaz M.; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Grunwald, Michael R.; Hashmi, Shahrukh K.; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Kindwall-Keller, Tamila; Kröger, Nicolaus; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Liesveld, Jane L.; Litzow, Mark R.; Marks, David I.; Nathan, Sunita; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Pawarod, Attaphol; Rowe, Jacob M.; Savani, Bipin N.; Savoie, Mary Lynn; Seo, Sachiko; Solh, Melhem; Tamari, Roni; Verdonck, Leo F.; Yared, Jean A.; Alyea, Edwin; Popat, Uday; Sobecks, Ronald; Scott, Bart L.; Nakamura, Ryotaro; Mesa, Ruben; Saber, Wael; Medicine, School of MedicineAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.Item Transplant Physicians’ Attitudes on Candidacy for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) in Older Patients: The Need for a Standardized Geriatric Assessment (GA) Tool(Elsevier, 2020-03) Mishra, Asmita; Preussler, Jaime M.; Al-Mansour, Zeina; Bachanova, Veronika; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Bredeson, Christopher; Chhabra, Saurabh; D’Souza, Anita; Dahi, Parastoo B.; DeFilipp, Zack; Gowda, Lohith; Danaher Hacker, Eileen; Hashmi, Shahrukh K.; Howard, Dianna S.; Jakubowski, Ann A.; Jayani, Reena; Johnston, Laura; Koll, Thuy; Lin, Richard J.; McCurdy, Shannon R.; Michaelis, Laura C.; Muffly, Lori; Nathwani, Nitya; Olin, Rebecca L.; Popat, Uday R.; Rodriguez, Cesar; Rosko, Ashley; Runaas, Lyndsey; Sabloff, Mitchell; Shore, Tsiporah B.; Shune, Leyla; Sorror, Mohamed L.; Sung, Anthony D.; Ustun, Celalettin; Wood, William; Burns, Linda J.; Artz, Andrew S.; School of NursingBackground Despite improvements in conditioning regimens and supportive care having expanded the curative potential of HCT, underutilization of HCT in older adults persists (Bhatt VR et al, BMT 2017). Therefore, we conducted a survey of transplant physicians (TP) to determine their perceptions of the impact of older age (≥60 years) on HCT candidacy and utilization of tools to gauge candidacy. Methods We conducted a 23-item, online cross-sectional survey of adult physicians recruited from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between May and July 2019. Results 175/770 (22.7%) TP completed the survey; majority of respondents were 41-60 years old, male, and practicing in a teaching hospital. Over 75% were at centers performing ≥50 HCT per year. When considering regimen intensity, most (96%, n=168) had an upper age limit (UAL) for using a myeloablative regimen (MAC), with only 29 physicians (17%) stating they would consider MAC for patients ≥70 years. In contrast, when considering a reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA), 8%, (n=13), 54% (n=93), and 20% (n=35) stated that age 70, 75, and 80 years respectively would be the UAL to use this approach, with 18% (n=31) reporting no UAL. TP agreed that Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) could exclude older pts for HCT, with 39.1% (n=66), 42.6% (n=72), and 11.4% (n=20) requiring KPS of ≥70, 80, and 90, respectively. The majority (n=92, 52.5%) indicated an HCT-comorbidity index threshold for exclusion, mostly ranging from ≥3 to ≥ 5. Almost all (89.7%) endorsed the need for a better health assessment of pre-HCT vulnerabilities to guide candidacy for pts ≥60 with varied assessments being utilized beyond KPS (Figure 1). However, the majority of centers rarely (33.1%) or never (45.7%) utilize a dedicated geriatrician/geriatric-oncologist to assess alloHCT candidates ≥60 yrs. The largest barriers to performing GA included uncertainty about which tools to use, lack of knowledge and training, and lack of appropriate clinical support staff (Figure 2). Approximately half (n=78, 45%) endorsed GA now routinely influences candidacy. Conclusions The vast majority of TP will consider RIC/NMA alloHCT for patients ≥70 years. However, there is heterogeneity in assessing candidacy. Incorporation of GA into a standardized and easily applied health assessment tool for risk stratification is an unmet need. The recently opened BMT CTN 1704 may aid in addressing this gap.