Browsing by Author "Charlton, Michael"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The demise of islet allotransplantation in the United States: A call for an urgent regulatory update
    (Wiley, 2021-04) Witkowski, Piotr; Philipson, Louis H.; Kaufman, Dixon B.; Ratner, Lloyd E.; Abouljoud, Marwan S.; Bellin, Melena D.; Buse, John B.; Kandeel, Fouad; Stock, Peter G.; Mulligan, David C.; Markmann, James F.; Kozlowski, Tomasz; Andreoni, Kenneth A.; Alejandro, Rodolfo; Baidal, David A.; Hardy, Mark A.; Wickrema, Amittha; Mirmira, Raghavendra G.; Fung, John; Becker, Yolanda T.; Josephson, Michelle A.; Bachul, Piotr J.; Pyda, Jordan S.; Charlton, Michael; Millis, J. Michael; Gaglia, Jason L.; Stratta, Robert J.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Niederhaus, Silke V.; Forbes, Rachael C.; Jayant, Kumar; Robertson, R. Paul; Odorico, Jon S.; Levy, Marlon F.; Harland, Robert C.; Abrams, Peter L.; Olaitan, Oyedolamu K.; Kandaswamy, Raja; Wellen, Jason R.; Japour, Anthony J.; Desai, Chirag S.; Naziruddin, Bashoo; Balamurugan, Appakalai N.; Barth, Rolf N.; Ricordi, Camillo; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Islet allotransplantation in the United States (US) is facing an imminent demise. Despite nearly three decades of progress in the field, an archaic regulatory framework has stymied US clinical practice. Current regulations do not reflect the state-of-the-art in clinical or technical practices. In the US, islets are considered biologic drugs and “more than minimally manipulated” human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps). In contrast, across the world, human islets are appropriately defined as “minimally manipulated tissue” and not regulated as a drug, which has led to islet allotransplantation (allo-ITx) becoming a standard-of-care procedure for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This regulatory distinction impedes patient access to islets for transplantation in the US. As a result only 11 patients underwent allo-ITx in the US between 2016 and 2019, and all as investigational procedures in the settings of a clinical trials. Herein, we describe the current regulations pertaining to islet transplantation in the United States. We explore the progress which has been made in the field and demonstrate why the regulatory framework must be updated to both better reflect our current clinical practice and to deal with upcoming challenges. We propose specific updates to current regulations which are required for the renaissance of ethical, safe, effective, and affordable allo-ITx in the United States.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
    (Wiley, 2017) Chalasani, Naga; Younossi, Zobair; Lavine, Joel E.; Charlton, Michael; Cusi, Kenneth; Rinella, Mary; Harrison, Stephen A.; Brunt, Elizabeth M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
    This guidance provides a data-supported approach to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of NAFLD care. A “Guidance” document is different from a “Guideline.” Guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts and rate the quality (level) of the evidence and the strength of each recommendation using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A guidance document is developed by a panel of experts in the topic, and guidance statements, not recommendations, are put forward to help clinicians understand and implement the most recent evidence.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin for Treatment of HCV Infection in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease
    (Elsevier, 2015-09) Charlton, Michael; Everson, Gregory T.; Flamm, Steven L.; Kumar, Princy; Landis, Charles; Brown, Robert S., Jr.; Fried, Michael W.; Terrault, Norah A.; O'Leary, Jacqueline G.; Vargas, Hugo E.; Kuo, Alexander; Schiff, Eugene; Sulkowski, Mark S.; Gilroy, Richard; Watt, Kymberly D.; Brown, Kimberly; Kwo, Paul; Pungpapong, Surakit; Korenblat, Kevin M.; Muir, Andrew J.; Teperman, Lewis; Fontana, Robert J.; Denning, Jill; Arterburn, Sarah; Dvory-Sobol, Hadas; Brandt-Sarif, Theo; Pang, Phillip S.; McHutchison, John G.; Reddy, K. Rajender; Afdhal, Nezam; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background & Aims There are no effective and safe treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of patients who have advanced liver disease. Methods In this phase 2, open-label study, we assessed treatment with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir, the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, and ribavirin in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Cohort A enrolled patients with cirrhosis and moderate or severe hepatic impairment who had not undergone liver transplantation. Cohort B enrolled patients who had undergone liver transplantation: those without cirrhosis; those with cirrhosis and mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment; and those with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 12 or 24 weeks of a fixed-dose combination tablet containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, once daily, plus ribavirin. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Results We enrolled 337 patients, 332 (99%) with HCV genotype 1 infection and 5 (1%) with HCV genotype 4 infection. In cohort A (nontransplant), SVR12 was achieved by 86%–89% of patients. In cohort B (transplant recipients), SVR12 was achieved by 96%–98% of patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, by 85%−88% of patients with moderate hepatic impairment, by 60%–75% of patients with severe hepatic impairment, and by all 6 patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Response rates in the 12- and 24-week groups were similar. Thirteen patients (4%) discontinued the ledipasvir and sofosbuvir combination prematurely because of adverse events; 10 patients died, mainly from complications related to hepatic decompensation. Conclusion The combination of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for 12 weeks produced high rates of SVR12 in patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation.