Browsing by Author "Carter, David L."

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effective Police Homicide Investigations: Evidence from Seven Cities with High Clearance Rates
    (Sage, 2015-03) Carter, David L.; Carter, Jeremy G.; School of Public and Environmental Affairs
    At present, the average homicide clearance rate in the United States is approximately 65%, down roughly 15% from the mid-1970s. This research seeks to inform how police can best improve homicide clearance rates by identifying best practices in homicide investigations. To accomplish this goal, as part of a federally funded project, seven geographically representative law enforcement agencies were identified that had at least 24 homicides in 2011 and had a clearance rate of 80% or higher from which effective investigative practices could be gleaned. Qualitative findings indicate that a strong community policing presence, collaboration with external agencies, and an innovative culture facilitate high rates of homicide clearance. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Intelligence Fusion Process for State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement
    (2009-12) Carter, David L.; Carter, Jeremy G.
    Intelligence fusion centers have grown rapidly in the last few years as state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies have attempted to find the best way to share information about threats to their communities. The Department of Homeland Security and the Information Sharing Environment of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence embraced fusion centers as being an important mechanism to aid them in their missions to share terrorism information among law enforcement, the private sector, and the intelligence community. The development and management of fusion centers have received significant guidance from the Justice Department, via the Global Intelligence Working Group, by developing standards for structure and processes. Critics, however, are concerned that the centers have inadequate protections for privacy and civil rights. This article examines issues in the development of fusion centers and provides an examination of the support for and criticisms of such agencies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intelligence Led Policing: Conceptual and Functional Considerations for Public Policy
    (2009-09) Carter, David L.; Carter, Jeremy G.
    Policing in the post-9/11 era is experiencing a philosophical change that is expanding community- and problem-oriented policing to include the broader philosophy of intelligence-led policing (ILP). Building on the British experience, the application of ILP to American policing has been complicated by a number of challenges. Although stimulated by 9/11, the movement toward ILP is being furthered by a number of federal public policy initiatives. As a result of these diverse demands, law enforcement must revisit operational policies and creatively adjust their organizations to reflect this new paradigm. This article provides insight on the conceptual background of ILP, public policy standards, and the integration of ILP with community policing.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intelligence Training
    (2013) Carter, Jeremy G.; Carter, David L.; Chermak, Steven
    The role of intelligence in law enforcement agencies has an important history, and its importance changed dramatically after the September 11th terrorist attacks. Expectations for law enforcement agencies to build an intelligence capacity have never been higher and fundamental changes to how information is shared and distributed has occurred. Although it is clear that intelligence is critical for responding to terrorism and other types of crime, and that there are great expectations for law enforcement agencies to conform to national standards, there is very little research that has explored the issues related to intelligence training in the United States. This article fills this gap. Specifically, we provide a brief history of the role of intelligence in law enforcement agencies and then describe current expectations. We then provide an overview of some of the national training programs that have been created to assist law enforcement in this area. We then discuss research results using data from a national assessment of intelligence practices, focusing on critical training issues. We conclude with a discussion of what efforts must be undertaken to enhance the current training that is available.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Law Enforcement Fusion Centers: Cultivating an Information Sharing Environment while Safeguarding Privacy
    (Springer, 2016) Carter, Jeremy G.; Carter, David L.; School of Public and Environmental Affairs
    The national network of fusion centers, of which there are currently 78 nationwide, was created in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and continue to play an integral role in contemporary law enforcement. Their mission, put simply, is to facilitate information sharing across disparate agencies and organizations. Despite a significant presence within the law enforcement landscape, fusion centers have received relatively minimal scholarly attention. This limited literature alludes to operational challenges and public concerns that inhibit fusion center effectiveness. More specifically, little information is known about how fusion centers develop relationships with external partners as well as institute mechanisms to safeguard against violations of individual privacy. The present research employs a combination of national survey data and three in-depth case studies of fusion centers in Florida, Nevada, and Michigan to provide initial answers to these questions. Implications for improved policy and practice are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Law Enforcement Intelligence: Implications for Self-Radicalized Terrorism
    (2012-05) Carter, Jeremy G.; Carter, David L.
    A series of tragic events over the last three years has further strengthened the emerging preventative and proactive philosophies adopted by US law enforcement post-September 11, 2001. Law enforcement and the American public now have a heightened awareness of homegrown terrorism. While these terrorist actors operate independent of traditional terrorist networks and groups, they are often influenced by such groups through a process where they enter as a non-violent individual and exit as a violent ‘true believer’. Efforts by law enforcement to mitigate or prevent such threats rely on the implementation of intelligence-led policing practices. Central to these practices is the input of raw information into the intelligence cycle. This paper will discuss the importance and application of suspicious activity reporting as it impacts law enforcement intelligence practices to prevent threats from self-radicalized terrorism.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Law Enforcement’s Information Sharing Infrastructure: A National Assessment
    (2013-06) Chermak, Steven; Carter, Jeremy G.; Carter, David L.; McGarrell, Edmund F.; Drew, Jack
    The September 11 attacks impacted society generally, and law enforcement specifically, in dramatic ways. One of the major trends has been changing expectations regarding criminal intelligence practices among state, local, and tribal (SLT) law enforcement agencies and the need to coordinate intelligence efforts and share information at all levels of government. In fact, enhancing intelligence efforts has emerged as a critical issue for the prevention of all threats and crimes. To date, an increasing number of SLT law enforcement agencies have expanded their intelligence capacity, and there have been fundamental changes in the national, state, and local information sharing infrastructure. Moreover, critical to these expanding information sharing expectations is the institutionalization of fusion centers (FCs). Despite these dramatic changes, an expanding role, and the acknowledgement that local law enforcement intelligence is critical to the prevention and deterrence of threats and crimes, very little research exists that highlights issues related to the intelligence practices of SLT law enforcement agencies and FCs.1 This research describes what agencies are doing to build an intelligence capacity and assesses the state of information sharing among agencies. Specifically, a national survey was developed to examine the experiences of SLT agencies and FCs for building an intelligence capacity as well as to understand critical gaps in the sharing of information regarding intelligence.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Understanding Law Enforcement Intelligence Processes: Report to the Office of University Programs, Science and Technology Directorate
    (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2014) Carter, David L.; Chermak, Steven; Carter, Jeremy G.; Drew, Jack
    Despite clear evidence of significant changes, very little research exists that examines issues related to the intelligence practices of state, local, and tribal (SLT) law enforcement agencies. Important questions on the nature of the issues that impact SLT intelligence practices remain. While there is some uncertainty among SLT law enforcement about current terrorism threats, there is certainty that these threats evolve in a largely unpredictable pattern. As a result there is an ongoing need for consistent and effective information collection, analysis and sharing. Little information is known about perceptions of how information is being shared between agencies and whether technologies have improved or hurt information sharing, and little is known about whether agencies think they are currently prepared for a terrorist attack, and the key factors distinguishing those that think they are compared to those who do not. This study was designed to address these issues, and a better understanding of these issues could significantly enhance intelligence practices and enhance public safety.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Understanding the Intelligence Practices of State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies
    (2011-10) Carter, David L.; Chermak, Steven; McGarrell, Ed; Carter, Jeremy G.; Drew, Jack
    In addition, the study examined the activities of three fusion centers in order to identify strategies that are successful in increasing the information flow across agencies, the major obstacles to effective intelligence-gathering and information-sharing, and identify key practices for integrating domestic intelligence into the information-sharing environment and overcoming these obstacles. The study found that although significant progress has been made since 9/11 in installing fundamental policy and procedures related to building the intelligence capacity of law enforcement, there is significant room for improvement and a need to move agencies forward to be consistent with key requirements. Also, fusion centers are further along in instituting intelligence policies and practices than are individual law enforcement agencies. This is most likely because there has been a focus on developing fusion center operations and expertise by both the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice. In addition, both samples of respondents emphasized that they have worked at building relationships with a diverse range of agencies, but they also indicated that they are not completely satisfied with these relationships. Further, there is a significant amount of information coming into and going out of these agencies. It is likely that without sufficient analysts within the organizations or poorly trained analysts, there are missed opportunities for strategic and tactical understanding of homeland security and criminal threats. Assessing the performance of analysts is difficult, but respondents emphasized the need to focus on the quality of strategic and tactical products produced.