- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Carter, Allie"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Assessing psychosocial risk factors in children with Sickle Cell Disease(Springer Nature, 2025-01-18) Frey, Nicole; LaMotte, Julia E.; Bouck, Jillian R.; Fancher, Lauren; Parker, Genese T.; Carter, Allie; Jacob, Seethal A.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: Individuals with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) are a minoritized and marginalized community that have disparate health outcomes as a result of systemic racism and disease-related stigma. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychosocial risk factors for families caring for children with SCD at a pediatric SCD center through use of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), a validated caregiver-report screener. Methods: The PAT was administered annually during routine clinical visits and scored by the SCD Social Worker to provide tailored resources to families. The PAT stratifies scores into 3 categories of psychosocial concern: Universal, Targeted, Clinical. PATs administered between September 2021-December 2022 were analyzed. Results: Two hundred twenty-five PATs were included for analysis. Most caregivers identified as Black, single Women over 21 years old with a high school degree or more. The average patient age was 8.2 years (0-22 years). Sixty-seven percent of PATs fell into the Universal category. Dyads that scored in the Targeted or Clinical categories were more likely to report financial hardship, caregiver mental health concerns, and family stressors (p < 0.001). Nearly 50% of all families reported some form of financial difficulty, including almost 40% in the Universal category. Conclusions: Universal implementation of a psychosocial risk screener identified financial challenges for many families, as well as caregiver burden and mental health concerns, allowing for timely resource support. However, overall risk for many of these families was categorized as Universal or low risk, indicating that distribution of resources and support cannot be based on PAT category alone.Item Association between Cognitive Function and Physical Function, Frailty, and Quality of Life in Older Breast Cancer Survivors(MDPI, 2024-07-31) Von Ah, Diane; Rio, Carielle Joy; Carter, Allie; Perkins, Susan M.; Stevens, Erin; Rosko, Ashley; Davenport, Ashley; Kalady, Mathew; Noonan, Anne M.; Crouch, Adele; Storey, Susan; Overcash, Janine; Han, Claire J.; Yang, Yesol; Li, Haiying; Saligan, Leorey N.; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public HealthBackground: Older cancer survivors in general are at greater risk for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), yet few studies have explored its association with health outcomes. This study examined the association between subjective and objective measures of cognitive function and physical function, frailty, and quality of life (QoL) among older breast cancer survivors. Materials and methods: Older breast cancer survivors who reported cognitive concerns completed surveys on patient-reported cognitive function, physical function, frailty, and QoL as well as objective tests of visuospatial working memory and sustained attention. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and separate linear regression models. Results: A total of 219 female breast cancer survivors completed the study. Perceived cognitive abilities were associated with better physical function, frailty, and QoL (p ≤ 0.001) while cognitive concerns were negatively related with these metrics (p ≤ 0.001). Poorer visuospatial working memory and sustained attention were linked to increased frailty (p ≤ 0.001-0.01), whereas poorer sustained attention was associated with poorer physical function (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Older breast cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment and poorer cognitive performance reported poorer physical functioning, increased frailty, and poorer QoL. These findings underscore the importance of assessing cognitive concerns and their associated outcomes in older breast cancer survivors.Item Deprescribing anticholinergics to preserve brain health: reducing the risk of dementia through deprescribing (R2D2): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial(Springer Nature, 2024-11-22) Campbell, Noll L.; Holden, Richard J.; Gao, Sujuan; Unverzagt, Frederick W.; Lane, Kathleen A.; Carter, Allie; Harrington, Addison B.; Manoharan, Sneha; Manoharan, Neha; Rosenthal, Danielle L.; Pitts, Christopher; Pelkey, Kathryn; Papineau, Emily; Lauck, David M.; Keshk, Noha; Alamer, Khalid; Khalil, Hussein; Boustani, Malaz A.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineBackground: Older adults commonly experience chronic medical conditions and are at risk of cognitive impairment as a result of age, chronic comorbidity, and medications prescribed to manage multiple chronic conditions. Anticholinergic medications are common treatments for chronic conditions and have been repeatedly associated with poor cognitive outcomes, including delirium and dementia, in epidemiologic studies. However, no study has definitively evaluated the causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition in a randomized controlled trial design. Utilizing our prior experience in deprescribing anticholinergic medications in various clinical environments, we designed an outpatient deprescribing intervention to prospectively test the potential causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition in primary care older adults. Methods: This cluster randomized clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate the impact of an anticholinergic deprescribing intervention compared to usual care on outcomes of cognition and safety in primary care older adults. Participants will include those aged 65 years and over, receiving primary care in the greater Indianapolis area, using a strong anticholinergic within the last 2 weeks or with evidence of high-risk exposure in the past year. Those excluded will have a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or related dementia, or serious mental illness. The trial plans to enroll 344 participants who will be cluster-randomized at the level of primary care physician to avoid contamination. Participants will complete outcome assessments every 6 months up to 2 years by blinded outcome assessors. The primary outcome of the study is a composite measure of cognition that includes domains assessing executive cognitive function, language, and memory. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures of pain intensity, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and health-related quality of life. Discussion: The R2D2 trial will be the largest and longest prospective randomized trial testing the impact of an anticholinergic-specific deprescribing intervention on cognition in primary care older adults. Results could influence deprescribing methodology and provide new insight on the relationship between anticholinergics and cognition.Item Health Care Disparities in Outpatient Diabetes Management During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Where Do We Stand Now?(Elsevier, 2023) Frontera, Eric D.; Cavagahan, Melissa K.; Carter, Allie; Saeed, Zeb I.; Medicine, School of MedicineObjective: We examined diabetes outpatient management during the first 2 years of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic in an endocrinology practice with a focus on health care disparities in outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining adults with diabetes during 3 time periods: T1 (March 2019-February 2020), T2 (March 2020-February 2021), and T3 (March 2021-February 2022). Clinical outcomes included body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), Hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and urine albumin:creatinine ratio. Appointment types (virtual vs in-person) were also collected. Results: Frequencies of HgbA1c, BMI, and SBP measurements reduced by 36.0%, 46.3%, and 48.5% in T2, respectively, and remaining 8.7% (HgbA1c), 13.4% (BMI), and 15.2% (SBP) lower at the end of the study period (P < .001) compared to prepandemic levels. However, the average HgbA1c and LDL slightly improved. Clinic appointments per patient increased during the pandemic, fueled by telehealth utilization. Women had fewer in-person visits during T2, those older than 65 had better HgbA1c, and the most socioeconomically deprived group had the worst HgbA1c during every time period. In addition, black patients had worse HgbA1c, LDL, and SBP values throughout the study, which did not worsen over the pandemic. Conclusion: While the frequency of health measurements had not fully recovered 2 years into the pandemic, this did not translate to worse diabetes management or a widening of pre-existing disparities. Our study emphasizes the role of equitable health care in minimizing inequalities in diabetes, particularly during times of crisis.Item Health literacy and cumulative social disadvantage are associated with survival and transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study(BMJ, 2024-10-02) Nephew, Lauren D.; Rawl, Susan M.; Carter, Allie; Garcia, Nicole; Monahan, Patrick O.; Holden, John; Ghabril, Marwan; Montalvan-Sanchez, Eleazar; Patidar, Kavish; Desai, Archita P.; Orman, Eric; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of MedicineObjective: To investigate how individual social determinants of health (SDOH) and cumulative social disadvantage (CSD) affect survival and receipt of liver transplant (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We enrolled 139 adult patients from two Indianapolis hospital systems between June 2019 and April 2022. Structured questionnaires collected SDOH and social risk factor data. We compared SDOH and CSD by race, gender and disease aetiology, assigning one point per adverse SDOH. Multivariable competing risk survival analysis assessed associations between SDOH, CSD, survival and LT receipt. Results: Black patients experienced higher CSD than white patients in the cohort (5.4±2.5 vs 3.2±2.1, p<0.001). Black patients were significantly more likely to have household incomesItem Practice patterns in the diagnosis and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a survey of oncologists(Springer, 2025-04-04) Belsky, Jennifer A.; Dupuis, L. Lee; Sung, Lillian; Carter, Allie; Leisinger, Audrey; Orgel, Etan; Parsons, Susan K.; Roth, Michael; Pediatrics, School of MedicinePurpose: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects > 78% of oncology patients and causes detrimental side effects. There may be practice heterogenicity in CIPN management amongst oncologists treating pediatric, adolescent young adult (AYA), and adult patients with cancer. We sought to evaluate the practice patterns of oncologists regarding their management of CIPN in AYAs with cancer. Methods: A survey was developed and sent to pediatric and medical oncologists from across the United States. Scenarios included an 18-year-old receiving vincristine (VCR) with mild neuropathy (Scenario 1) and moderate/severe neuropathy (Scenario 2). Respondents were asked how they would manage each patient. Differences between pediatric and medical oncologists' management were assessed. Results: A total of 179 responses were submitted by 132 (73.7%) pediatric, 44 (24.6%) medical oncologists, and 3 (1.6%) oncologists who care for both pediatric and adult patients. Over half of respondents for Scenario 1 would refer the patient to physical therapy (PT) (56.8%), 38.1% would prescribe a pharmacologic agent, and 27.8% would dose reduce/omit vincristine. For Scenario 2, most (81.8%) would dose reduce/omit vincristine, 69.3% would refer for PT, and 44.9% would start a pharmacologic agent. On multivariable analyses, medical oncologists were more likely to dose reduce/omit vincristine for Scenario 1 (OR, 7.68; 95% CI, 3.24-18.22) and Scenario 2 (OR, 5.52; 95% CI, 1.37-22.18, and less likely to refer to PT for Scenario 1 (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05-0.31) and Scenario 2 (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.41). Conclusion: Our survey suggests a broad spectrum of CIPN management in AYAs with cancer. The heterogenicity in practices and significant differences between pediatric and medical oncologists underscores an urgent need to better understand the source of heterogeneity in CIPN management practices and barriers to evidence-based care delivery.Item Reducing Anticholinergic Medication Exposure among Older Adults using Consumer Technology: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial(Elsevier, 2021) Abebe, Ephrem; Campbell, Noll L.; Clark, Daniel O.; Tu, Wanzhu; Hill, Jordan R.; Harrington, Addison B.; O’Neal, Gracen; Trowbridge, Kimberly S.; Vallejo, Christian; Yang, Ziyi; Bo, Na; Knight, Alexxus; Alamer, Khalid A.; Carter, Allie; Valenzuela, Robin; Adeoye, Philip; Boustani, Malaz A.; Holden, Richard J.; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: A growing body of scientific evidence points to the potentially harmful cognitive effects of anticholinergic medications among older adults. Most interventions designed to promote deprescribing of anticholinergics have directly targeted healthcare professionals and have had mixed results. Consumer-facing technologies may provide a unique benefit by empowering patients and can complement existing healthcare professional-centric efforts. Methods: We initiated a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-facing mobile application (Brain Safe app) compared to an attention control medication list app in reducing anticholinergic exposure among community-dwelling older adults. Study participants are adults aged 60 years and above, currently using at least one prescribed strong anticholinergic, and receiving primary care. The trial plans to enroll a total of 700 participants, randomly allocated in 1:1 proportion to the two study arms. Participants will have the Brain Safe app (intervention arm) or attention control medication list app (control arm) loaded onto a smartphone (study provided or personal device). All participants will be followed for 12 months and will have data collected at baseline, at 6 months, and 12 months by blinded outcome assessors. The primary outcome of the study is anticholinergic exposure measured as total standard daily dose (TSDD) computed from medication prescription electronic records. Secondary outcomes of the study are cognitive function and health-related quality of life. Discussion: A consumer-facing intervention to promote deprescribing of potentially high-risk medications can be part of a multi-pronged approach to reduce inappropriate medication use among older adult patients. Delivering a deprescribing intervention via a mobile app is a novel approach and may hold great promise to accelerate deployment of medication safety initiatives across diverse patient populations.Item Social determinants of health impact mortality from HCC and cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study(Wolters Kluwer, 2023-02-09) Nephew, Lauren D.; Gupta, Dipika; Carter, Allie; Desai, Archita P.; Ghabril, Marwan; Patidar, Kavish R.; Orman, Eric; Dziarski, Alisha; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground and aims: The social determinants of health can pose barriers to accessing cancer screening and treatment and have been associated with cancer mortality. However, it is not clear whether area deprivation is independently associated with mortality in HCC and cholangiocarcinoma when controlling for individual-level social determinants of health. Approach and results: The cohort included individuals over 18 years old diagnosed with HCC (N=3460) or cholangiocarcinoma (N=781) and reported to the Indiana State Cancer Registry from 2009 to 2017. Area disadvantage was measured using the social deprivation index (SDI). SDI was obtained by linking addresses to the American Community Survey. Individual social determinants of health included race, ethnicity, sex, marital status, and insurance type. The primary outcome was mortality while controlling for SDI and individual social determinants of health by means of Cox proportional hazard modeling. In HCC, living in a neighborhood in the fourth quartile of census-track SDI (most deprived) was associated with higher mortality (HR: 1.14, 95% CI, 1.003-1.30, p=0.04) than living in a first quartile SDI neighborhood. Being uninsured (HR: 1.64, 95% CI, 1.30-2.07, p<0.0001) and never being married (HR: 1.31, 95% CI, 1.15-1.48, p<0.0001) were also associated with mortality in HCC. In cholangiocarcinoma, SDI was not associated with mortality. Conclusions: Social deprivation was independently associated with mortality in HCC but not cholangiocarcinoma. Further research is needed to better understand how to intervene on both area and individual social determinants of health and develop interventions to address these disparities.