ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Canete-Portillo, Sofía"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Molecular pathology of urogenital tumors : Recommendations from the 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference
    (SpringerLink, 2021-05) Hommerding, Oliver; Allory, Yves; Argani, Pedram; Bismar, Tarek A.; Bubendorf, Lukas; Canete-Portillo, Sofía; Chaux, Alcides; Chen, Ying-Bei; Cheng, Liang; Cubilla, Antonio L.; Egevad, Lars; Gill, Anthony J.; Grignon, David J.; Hartmann, Arndt; Hes, Ondrej; Idrees, Muhammad T.; Kao, Chia-Sui; Knowles, Margaret A.; Looijenga, Leendert H.J.; Lotan, Tamara L.; Pritchard, Colin C.; Rubin, Mark A.; Tomlins, Scott A.; Van der Kwast, Theodorus H.; Velazquez, Elsa F.; Warrick, Joshua I.; Williamson, Sean R.; Kristiansen, Glen; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Comprehensive understanding of molecular principles in cancer and the diversification of oncological therapy promise individual therapeutic concepts, which have not yet found their way into urogenital cancer therapy. In March 2019 the International Society of Urogenital Pathology (ISUP) therefore held a consensus conference on recommendations for molecular diagnostics of genitourinary tumors, which were published in five separate manuscripts and are summarized in this article.In preparation for the conference, a comprehensive survey of current practices for molecular testing of urogenital tumors was carried out by members of the ISUP. At the conference, the results and the corresponding background information were presented by five working groups and recommendations for action for diagnostics were developed. An agreement between 66% of the conference participants was defined as consensus.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University