- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Bushey, Michael"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item 70400 Collaborative Care for Opioid Dependence And Pain (CCODAP): A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of an Opioid Tapering Intervention(Cambridge University Press, 2021) Bushey, Michael; Kroenke, Kurt; Medicine, School of MedicineABSTRACT IMPACT: If successful, this program can provide a scalable, patient-centered intervention to help patients taper off opioid medications in primary care settings. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Tapering of chronic opioid therapy is often desirable but challenging in primary care and specialty clinics that lack behavioral health expertise. The objective of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of testing a peer-delivered pain self-management program to assist primary care patients through an opioid taper. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To provide critical support to patients and providers during opioid medication tapering, we propose to conduct a 40 patient randomized controlled pilot of a 12-week telecare collaborative care program administered by a psychiatrist and peer recovery specialist team. The intervention will incorporate a validated positive psychology intervention for treating chronic pain. Additionally, participants will be invited to participate in semi-structured individual interviews to discuss their experience in the trial, what worked well, what could be improved, and potential strategies to bolster recruitment of additional patients in future studies. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our primary aim is to determine the effectiveness of our intervention in facilitating opioid medication weaning, with reduction in opioid dose as the primary outcome. Our secondary aims will be to assess pain outcomes, adherence to tapering, patient satisfaction, and barriers to adherence as described by patients. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: This trial proposes a novel collaborative care approach for opioid weaning using proven, easy-to-deliver positive psychology tools for pain management that, if successful, could be implemented broadly in many clinics struggling to safely reduce opioid prescribing.Item The Indiana Learning Health System Initiative: Early experience developing a collaborative, regional learning health system(Wiley, 2021-07) Schleyer, Titus; Williams, Linda; Gottlieb, Jonathan; Weaver, Christopher; Saysana, Michele; Azar, Jose; Sadowski, Josh; Frederick, Chris; Hui, Siu; Kara, Areeba; Ruppert, Laura; Zappone, Sarah; Bushey, Michael; Grout, Randall; Embi, Peter J.; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction Learning health systems (LHSs) are usually created and maintained by single institutions or healthcare systems. The Indiana Learning Health System Initiative (ILHSI) is a new multi-institutional, collaborative regional LHS initiative led by the Regenstrief Institute (RI) and developed in partnership with five additional organizations: two Indiana-based health systems, two schools at Indiana University, and our state-wide health information exchange. We report our experiences and lessons learned during the initial 2-year phase of developing and implementing the ILHSI. Methods The initial goals of the ILHSI were to instantiate the concept, establish partnerships, and perform LHS pilot projects to inform expansion. We established shared governance and technical capabilities, conducted a literature review-based and regional environmental scan, and convened key stakeholders to iteratively identify focus areas, and select and implement six initial joint projects. Results The ILHSI successfully collaborated with its partner organizations to establish a foundational governance structure, set goals and strategies, and prioritize projects and training activities. We developed and deployed strategies to effectively use health system and regional HIE infrastructure and minimize information silos, a frequent challenge for multi-organizational LHSs. Successful projects were diverse and included deploying a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Standards (FHIR)-based tool across emergency departments state-wide, analyzing free-text elements of cross-hospital surveys, and developing models to provide clinical decision support based on clinical and social determinants of health. We also experienced organizational challenges, including changes in key leadership personnel and varying levels of engagement with health system partners, which impacted initial ILHSI efforts and structures. Reflecting on these early experiences, we identified lessons learned and next steps. Conclusions Multi-organizational LHSs can be challenging to develop but present the opportunity to leverage learning across multiple organizations and systems to benefit the general population. Attention to governance decisions, shared goal setting and monitoring, and careful selection of projects are important for early success.