- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Buchman, Cameron D."
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Development of 2,5-dihydro-4H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one inhibitors of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A (ALDH1A) as potential adjuncts to ovarian cancer chemotherapy(Elsevier, 2021-02) Huddle, Brandt C.; Grimley, Edward; Chtcherbinine, Mikhail; Buchman, Cameron D.; Takahashi, Cyrus; Debnath, Bikash; McGonigal, Stacy C.; Mao, Shuai; Li, Siwei; Felton, Jeremy; Pan, Shu; Wen, Bo; Sun, Duxin; Neamati, Nouri; Buckanovich, Ronald J.; Hurley, Thomas D.; Larsen, Scott D.; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of MedicineThere is strong evidence that inhibition of one or more Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A (ALDH1A) isoforms may be beneficial in chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer and other tumor types. While many previous efforts have focused on development of ALDH1A1 selective inhibitors, the most deadly ovarian cancer subtype, high-grade serous (HGSOC), exhibits elevated expression of ALDH1A3. Herein, we report continued development of pan-ALDH1A inhibitors to assess whether broad spectrum ALDH1A inhibition is an effective adjunct to chemotherapy in this critical tumor subtype. Optimization of the CM39 scaffold, aided by metabolite ID and several new ALDH1A1 crystal structures, led to improved biochemical potencies, improved cellular ALDH inhibition in HGSOC cell lines, and substantial improvements in microsomal stability culminating in orally bioavailable compounds. We demonstrate that two compounds 68 and 69 are able to synergize with chemotherapy in a resistant cell line and patient-derived HGSOC tumor spheroids, indicating their suitability for future in vivo proof of concept experiments.Item Discovery and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the aldehyde dehydrogenase 1/2 family(2016-12) Buchman, Cameron D.; Hurley, Thomas D.; Elmendorf, Jeffrey S.; Hoang, Quyen; Wek, Ronald C.The human aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) superfamily consists of 19 isoenzymes that are critical for normal physiology as well as the removal of toxic aldehydes. Members of the ALDH1/2 family have vital roles in cell signaling during early development, ethanol metabolism, and the removal of aldehydes derived from oxidative stress. We sought to develop selective compounds toward ALDH2 to help determine its individual contribution to biological function, as many of the ALDH1/2 family possess overlapping substrate preferences. A high-throughput screen of over 100,000 compounds uncovered a class of aromatic lactones which inhibit the ALDH1/2 enzyme family. The lactones were then characterized using a combination of enzyme kinetics, X-ray crystallography, and cell culture experiments. We found that many of the lactones are over ten times more potent toward ALDH2 than daidzin, a previously described ALDH2 inhibitor. Our ability to produce many more ALDH isoenzymes allowed us to determine that daidzin is not as selective as previously believed, inhibiting ALDH2, ALDH1B1, and ALDH1A2 with equal potency. This inhibition pattern was seen with several of the aromatic lactones as well. Structural studies show that many of the lactones bind between key aromatic residues in the ALDH1/2 enzyme substrate-binding sites. One lactone in particular mimics the position of an aldehyde substrate and alters the position of the catalytic cysteine to interfere with the productive binding of NAD+ for enzyme catalysis. Further characterization of related compounds led to the realization that the mechanism of inhibition, potency, and selectivity differs amongst the lactones based off the substituents on the aromatic scaffold and its precise binding location. Two of these compounds were found to be selective for one of the ALDH1/2 family members, BUC22, selective for ALDH1A1, and BUC27, selective for ALDH2. BUC22 demonstrates ten-fold selectivity for ALDH1A1 over ALDH1A2 and does not inhibit the remaining ALDH1/2 enzymes. Additionally, treatment with BUC22 led to decreased growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells in culture. BUC27 inhibits ALDH2 with the same potency as daidzin. Both BUC22 and BUC27 could be further developed to use as chemical tools to better understand the functional roles of ALDH1A1 and ALDH2 in biological systems.Item Discovery of a series of aromatic lactones as ALDH1/2-directed inhibitors(Elsevier, 2015-06-05) Buchman, Cameron D.; Mahalingan, Krishna K.; Hurley, Thomas D.; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, IU School of MedicineIn humans, the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily consists of 19 isoenzymes which mostly catalyze the NAD(P)(+)-dependent oxidation of aldehydes. Many of these isoenzymes have overlapping substrate specificities and therefore their potential physiological functions may overlap. Thus the development of new isoenzyme-selective probes would be able to better delineate the function of a single isoenzyme and its individual contribution to the metabolism of a particular substrate. This specific study was designed to find a novel modulator of ALDH2, a mitochondrial ALDH isoenzyme most well-known for its role in acetaldehyde oxidation. 53 compounds were initially identified to modulate the activity of ALDH2 by a high-throughput esterase screen from a library of 63,000 compounds. Of these initial 53 compounds, 12 were found to also modulate the oxidation of propionaldehyde by ALDH2. Single concentration measurements at 10μM compound were performed using ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH2, ALDH1B1, ALDH3A1, ALDH4A1, and/or ALDH5A1 to determine the selectivity of these 12 compounds toward ALDH2. Four of the twelve compounds shared an aromatic lactone structure and were found to be potent inhibitors of the ALDH1/2 isoenzymes, but have no inhibitory effect on ALDH3A1, ALDH4A1 or ALDH5A1. Two of the aromatic lactones show selectivity within the ALDH1/2 class, and one appears to be selective for ALDH2 compared to all other isoenzymes tested.Item Enrichment of Chemical Libraries Docked to Protein Conformational Ensembles and Application to Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2(American Chemical Society, 2014-07-28) Wang, Bo; Buchman, Cameron D.; Li, Liwei; Hurley, Thomas D.; Meroueh, Samy O.; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, IU School of MedicineMolecular recognition is a complex process that involves a large ensemble of structures of the receptor and ligand. Yet, most structure-based virtual screening is carried out on a single structure typically from X-ray crystallography. Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer an opportunity to sample multiple conformational states of a protein. Here we evaluate our recently developed scoring method SVMSP in its ability to enrich chemical libraries docked to MD structures of seven proteins from the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). SVMSP is a target-specific rescoring method that combines machine learning with statistical potentials. We find that enrichment power as measured by the area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) is not affected by increasing the number of MD structures. Among individual MD snapshots, many exhibited enrichment that was significantly better than the crystal structure, but no correlation between enrichment and structural deviation from crystal structure was found. We followed an innovative approach by training SVMSP scoring models using MD structures (SVMSPMD). The resulting models were applied to two difficult cases (p38 and CDK2) for which enrichment was not better than random. We found remarkable increase in enrichment power, particularly for p38, where the ROC-AUC increased by 0.30 to 0.85. Finally, we explored approaches for a priori identification of MD snapshots with high enrichment power from an MD simulation in the absence of active compounds. We found that the use of randomly selected compounds docked to the target of interest using SVMSP led to notable enrichment for EGFR and Src MD snapshots. SVMSP rescoring of protein–compound MD structures was applied for the search of small-molecule inhibitors of the mitochondrial enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2). Rank-ordering of a commercial library of 50 000 compounds docked to MD structures of ALDH2 led to five small-molecule inhibitors. Four compounds had IC50s below 5 μM. These compounds serve as leads for the design and synthesis of more potent and selective ALDH2 inhibitors.Item Inhibition of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1/2 Family by Psoralen and Coumarin Derivatives(ACS, 2017-03-23) Buchman, Cameron D.; Hurley, Thomas D.; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of MedicineAldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2), one of 19 ALDH superfamily members, catalyzes the NAD+-dependent oxidation of aldehydes to their respective carboxylic acids. In this study, we further characterized the inhibition of four psoralen and coumarin derivatives toward ALDH2 and compared them to the ALDH2 inhibitor daidzin for selectivity against five ALDH1/2 isoenzymes. Compound 2 (Ki = 19 nM) binds within the aldehyde-binding site of the free enzyme species of ALDH2. Thirty-three structural analogs were examined to develop a stronger SAR profile. Seven compounds maintained or improved upon the selectivity toward one of the five ALDH1/2 isoenzymes, including compound 36, a selective inhibitor for ALDH2 (Ki = 2.4 μM), and compound 32, which was 10-fold selective for ALDH1A1 (Ki = 1.2 μM) versus ALDH1A2. Further medicinal chemistry on the compounds’ basic scaffold could enhance the potency and selectivity for ALDH1A1 or ALDH2 and generate chemical probes to examine the unique and overlapping functions of the ALDH1/2 isoenzymes.Item N,N-diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB) as a substrate and mechanism-based inhibitor for human ALDH isoenzymes(Elsevier, 2015-06-05) Morgan, Cynthia A.; Parajuli, Bibek; Buchman, Cameron D.; Dria, Karl; Hurley, Thomas D.; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, IU School of MedicineN,N-diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB) is a commonly used "selective" inhibitor of aldehyde dehydrogenase isoenzymes in cancer stem cell biology due to its inclusion as a negative control compound in the widely utilized Aldefluor assay. Recent evidence has accumulated that DEAB is not a selective inhibitory agent when assayed in vitro versus ALDH1, ALDH2 and ALDH3 family members. We sought to determine the selectivity of DEAB toward ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH1L1, ALDH2, ALDH3A1, ALDH4A1 and ALDH5A1 isoenzymes and determine the mechanism by which DEAB exerts its inhibitory action. We found that DEAB is an excellent substrate for ALDH3A1, exhibiting a Vmax/KM that exceeds that of its commonly used substrate, benzaldehyde. DEAB is also a substrate for ALDH1A1, albeit an exceptionally slow one (turnover rate ∼0.03 min(-1)). In contrast, little if any turnover of DEAB was observed when incubated with ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH2 or ALDH5A1. DEAB was neither a substrate nor an inhibitor for ALDH1L1 or ALDH4A1. Analysis by enzyme kinetics and QTOF mass spectrometry demonstrates that DEAB is an irreversible inhibitor of ALDH1A2 and ALDH2 with apparent bimolecular rate constants of 2900 and 86,000 M(-1) s(-1), respectively. The mechanism of inactivation is consistent with the formation of quinoid-like resonance state following hydride transfer that is stabilized by local structural features that exist in several of the ALDH isoenzymes.Item Structure-Based Optimization of a Novel Class of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A (ALDH1A) Subfamily-Selective Inhibitors as Potential Adjuncts to Ovarian Cancer Chemotherapy(American Chemical Society, 2018-10-11) Huddle, Brandt C.; Grimley, Edward; Buchman, Cameron D.; Chtcherbinine, Mikhail; Debnath, Bikash; Mehta, Pooja; Yang, Kun; Morgan, Cynthia A.; Li, Siwei; Felton, Jeremy; Sun, Duxin; Mehta, Geeta; Neamati, Nouri; Buckanovich, Ronald J.; Hurley, Thomas D.; Larsen, Scott D.; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of MedicineAldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity is commonly used as a marker to identify cancer stem-like cells. The three ALDH1A isoforms have all been individually implicated in cancer stem-like cells and in chemoresistance; however, which isoform is preferentially expressed varies between cell lines. We sought to explore the structural determinants of ALDH1A isoform selectivity in a series of small-molecule inhibitors in support of research into the role of ALDH1A in cancer stem cells. An SAR campaign guided by a cocrystal structure of the HTS hit CM39 (7) with ALDH1A1 afforded first-in-class inhibitors of the ALDH1A subfamily with excellent selectivity over the homologous ALDH2 isoform. We also discovered the first reported modestly selective single isoform 1A2 and 1A3 inhibitors. Two compounds, 13g and 13h, depleted the CD133+ putative cancer stem cell pool, synergized with cisplatin, and achieved efficacious concentrations in vivo following IP administration. Compound 13h additionally synergized with cisplatin in a patient-derived ovarian cancer spheroid model.Item Structure-Based Optimization of a Novel Class of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A (ALDH1A) Subfamily-Selective Inhibitors as Potential Adjuncts to Ovarian Cancer Chemotherapy(ACS, 2018-09) Huddle, Brandt C.; Grimley, Edward; Buchman, Cameron D.; Chtcherbinine, Mikhail; Debnath, Bikash; Mehta, Pooja; Yang, Kun; Morgan, Cynthia A.; Li, Siwei; Felton, Jeremy; Sun, Duxin; Mehta, Geeta; Neamati, Nouri; Buckanovich, Ronald J.; Hurley, Thomas D.; Larsen, Scott D.; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of MedicineAldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity is commonly used as a marker to identify cancer stem-like cells. The three ALDH1A isoforms have all been individually implicated in cancer stem-like cells and in chemoresistance; however, which isoform is preferentially expressed varies between cell lines. We sought to explore the structural determinants of ALDH1A isoform selectivity in a series of small-molecule inhibitors in support of research into the role of ALDH1A in cancer stem cells. An SAR campaign guided by a cocrystal structure of the HTS hit CM39 (7) with ALDH1A1 afforded first-in-class inhibitors of the ALDH1A subfamily with excellent selectivity over the homologous ALDH2 isoform. We also discovered the first reported modestly selective single isoform 1A2 and 1A3 inhibitors. Two compounds, 13g and 13h, depleted the CD133+ putative cancer stem cell pool, synergized with cisplatin, and achieved efficacious concentrations in vivo following IP administration. Compound 13h additionally synergized with cisplatin in a patient-derived ovarian cancer spheroid model.