Browsing by Author "Boyd, Allison N."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing and Anti-Xa Levels in Medicine Patients With Obesity
    (Sage, 2025-03-29) Phyo, Wint War; Deodhar, Karishma; Chang, Amy; Blair, Mary; Boyd, Allison N.; Geik, Christopher; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Previous studies have shown that the manufacturer's standard fixed dosing of enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis leads to sub-prophylactic anti-Xa levels in medicine patients with obesity. Yet, there is limited literature describing higher dosing strategies in this patient population, and an optimal dosing regimen has not been well-established. Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate mean doses (mg/kg/d) of prophylactic enoxaparin that are associated with goal anti-Xa levels in medicine patients with obesity across 3 body mass index (BMI) groups (40-49 kg/m2, 50-59 kg/m2, ≥60 kg/m2). Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 admitted to a medicine team with at least 1 appropriately drawn anti-Xa level between January 2018 and July 2023. The institution's goal anti-Xa level for VTE prophylaxis was 0.2 to 0.4 units/mL. The primary outcome was the comparison of mean dose between those within anti-Xa at goal and not at goal. Secondary outcomes included the percentages of initial anti-Xa levels below, within, or above goal range and the incidence of new VTE and major bleeding events during hospitalization while on enoxaparin. All outcomes were stratified into 3 BMI groups: 40-49 kg/m2, 50-59 kg/m2, and ≥60 kg/m2. Results: Median dose of those with final anti-Xa level at goal was significantly higher than that of those not in goal anti-Xa range across all 3 BMI groups (0.57 vs 0.50 mg/kg/d; P < 0.05). The majority of the initial anti-Xa levels were subprophylactic, with only 35.7% of patients (or 75 of 210 patients) had initial anti-Xa within the goal range. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of blood transfusions or VTE events between the groups. Conclusion: Findings suggest that medicine patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 may require enoxaparin doses higher than 0.5 mg/kg/d to reach goal prophylactic anti-Xa level. However, more robust data are necessary to further validate these results and the clinical implications.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A prospective analysis describing the innovative use of liposomal bupivacaine in burn patients
    (Elsevier, 2020-03) Boyd, Allison N.; Blair, Mary E.; Degenkolb, Kerri E.; Foster, David R.; Hartman, Brett C.; Sood, Rajiv; Walroth, Todd A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Burn patients frequently require autograft harvesting to facilitate wound healing, often resulting in significant pain. Liposomal bupivacaine is indicated for administration into a surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy, safety, and duration of postoperative analgesia with liposomal bupivacaine for donor site pain in burn patients. This was an observational, case–control study including adult patients with <20% total body surface area (TBSA) burned who received liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management after autograft harvesting from lower extremity donor site(s). Patients from the case group were matched to historical control patients treated with traditional pain management. The primary outcome was the cumulative pain scores on postoperative day one measured by the area under the curve (AUC0–24). Secondary outcomes included AUC0–72, total milligram morphine equivalents (MME), length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected in 36 patients who received liposomal bupivacaine, with 21 patients eligible for matching to historical controls. Patients included in the intervention and control groups were well-matched at baseline. Patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower median (IQR) AUC0–24 [578 (408,740) vs. 680 (544,803); p = 0.05] and shorter length of stay [4 days (1,9.5) vs. 6 days (318); p = 0.01]. No differences in adverse events related to the administration of liposomal bupivacaine or opioid-related adverse events were observed. Results indicate liposomal bupivacaine is safe and effective in burn patients. The results of this study add to the limited body of literature examining efficacy in this population.