Browsing by Author "Biousse, Valérie"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The demise of direct ophthalmoscopy: A modern clinical challenge
    (Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer) - American Academy of Neurology, 2015-04) Mackay, Devin D.; Garza, Philip S.; Bruce, Beau B.; Newman, Nancy J.; Biousse, Valérie; Department of Neurology, IU School of Medicine
    Ocular funduscopy appears to be a dying art. Physicians and medical students alike lack confidence in the use of an ophthalmoscope. As a result, few clinicians perform ophthalmoscopy, and many who do are unable to reliably detect abnormalities of the ocular fundus. Approaches to remediation in undergraduate medical education have included simulators, longitudinal skill reinforcement, Web-based teaching, and other techniques. Preservation of the ophthalmoscopic art has been hindered by technical difficulty, waning enthusiasm for ophthalmoscopy, and even discouragement from preceptors in medical education. Ocular fundus photography may serve a role in medical education to help improve student confidence in interpretation of ocular fundus findings and improve awareness of the importance of examination of the ocular fundus. Because neurology clerkships and clinical practices remain an important forum for honing ocular funduscopy skills, the neurologist should be familiar with novel alternative techniques that facilitate examination of the ocular fundus.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hemodialysis graft-induced intracranial hypertension
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2015-12) Mackay, Devin D.; Biousse, Valérie; Department of Neurology, IU School of Medicine
    Intracranial hypertension is rarely associated with peripheral hemodialysis shunts, presumably in association with central venous stenosis.1,2 Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) grafts (CryoLife, Inc., Kennesaw, GA) are designed to bypass preexisting central venous stenosis by connecting the brachial artery with the venous circulation through the ipsilateral internal jugular vein (IJV) (figure, C and D).3 We report a case of intracranial hypertension immediately after placement of a HeRO
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patient Harm Due to Diagnostic Error of Neuro-Ophthalmologic Conditions
    (Elsevier, 2021-09) Stunkel, Leanne; Sharma, Rahul A.; Mackay, Devin D.; Wilson, Bradley; Van Stavern, Gregory P.; Newman, Nancy J.; Biousse, Valérie; Neurology, School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: To prospectively examine diagnostic error of neuro-ophthalmic conditions and resultant harm at multiple sites. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 496 consecutive adult new patients seen at 3 university-based neuro-ophthalmology clinics in the United States in 2019 to 2020. METHODS: Collected data regarding demographics, prior care, referral diagnosis, final diagnosis, diagnostic testing, treatment, patient disposition, and impact of the neuro-ophthalmologic encounter. For misdiagnosed patients, we identified the cause of error using the Diagnosis Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy tool and whether the patient experienced harm due to the misdiagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was whether patients who were misdiagnosed before neuro-ophthalmology referral experienced harm as a result of the misdiagnosis. Secondary outcomes included appropriateness of referrals, misdiagnosis rate, interventions undergone before referral, and the primary type of diagnostic error. RESULTS: Referral diagnosis was incorrect in 49% of cases. A total of 26% of misdiagnosed patients experienced harm, which could have been prevented by earlier referral to neuro-ophthalmology in 97%. Patients experienced inappropriate laboratory testing, diagnostic imaging, or treatment before referral in 23%, with higher rates for patients misdiagnosed before referral (34% of patients vs. 13% with a correct referral diagnosis, P < 0.0001). Seventy-six percent of inappropriate referrals were misdiagnosed, compared with 45% of appropriate referrals (P < 0.0001). The most common reasons for referral were optic neuritis or optic neuropathy (21%), papilledema (18%), diplopia or cranial nerve palsies (16%), and unspecified vision loss (11%). The most common sources of diagnostic error were the physical examination (36%), generation of a complete differential diagnosis (24%), history taking (24%), and use or interpretation of diagnostic testing (13%). In 489 of 496 patients (99%), neuro-ophthalmology consultation (NOC) affected patient care. In 2% of cases, neuro-ophthalmology directly saved the patient's life or vision; in an additional 10%, harmful treatment was avoided or appropriate urgent referral was provided; and in an additional 48%, neuro-ophthalmology provided a diagnosis and direction to the patient's care. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis of neuro-ophthalmic conditions, mismanagement before referral, and preventable harm are common. Early appropriate referral to neuro-ophthalmology may prevent patient harm.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Referral Patterns in Neuro-Ophthalmology
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020-12) Stunkel, Leanne; Mackay, Devin D.; Bruce, Beau B.; Newman, Nancy J.; Biousse, Valérie; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Neuro-ophthalmologists specialize in complex, urgent, vision- and life-threatening problems, diagnostic dilemmas, and management of complex work-ups. Access is currently limited by the relatively small number of neuro-ophthalmologists, and consequently, patients may be affected by incorrect or delayed diagnosis. The objective of this study is to analyze referral patterns to neuro-ophthalmologists, characterize rates of misdiagnoses and delayed diagnoses in patients ultimately referred, and delineate outcomes after neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 300 new patients seen over 45 randomly chosen days between June 2011 and June 2015 in one tertiary care neuro-ophthalmology clinic. Demographics, distance traveled, time between onset and neuro-ophthalmology consultation (NOC), time between appointment request and NOC, number and types of providers seen before referral, unnecessary tests before referral, referral diagnoses, final diagnoses, and impact of the NOC on outcome were collected. Results: Patients traveled a median of 36.5 miles (interquartile range [IQR]: 20–85). Median time from symptom onset was 210 days (IQR: 70–1,100). Median time from referral to NOC was 34 days (IQR: 7–86), with peaks at one week (urgent requests) and 13 weeks (routine requests). Median number of previous providers seen was 2 (IQR: 2–4; range:0–10), and 102 patients (34%) had seen multiple providers within the same specialty before referral. Patients were most commonly referred for NOC by ophthalmologists (41% of referrals). Eighty-one percent (242/300) of referrals to neuro-ophthalmology were appropriate referrals. Of the 300 patients referred, 247 (82%) were complex or very complex; 119 (40%) were misdiagnosed; 147 (49%) were at least partially misdiagnosed; and 22 (7%) had unknown diagnoses. Women were more likely to be at least partially misdiagnosed—108 of 188 (57%) vs 39 of 112 (35%) of men (P < 0.001). Mismanagement or delay in care occurred in 85 (28%), unnecessary tests in 56 (19%), unnecessary consultations in 64 (22%), and imaging misinterpretation in 16 (5%). Neuro-ophthalmologists played a major role in directing treatment, such as preserving vision, preventing life-threatening complications, or avoiding harmful treatment in 62 (21%) patients. Conclusions: Most referrals to neuro-ophthalmologists are appropriate, but many are delayed. Misdiagnosis before referral is common. Neuro-ophthalmologists often prevent vision- and life-threatening complications.