Browsing by Author "Bhandari, Raj"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy
    (Elsevier, 2018) Rex, Douglas K.; Bhandari, Raj; Desta, Taddese; DeMicco, Michael; Schaeffer, Cynthia; Etzkorn, Kyle; Barish, Charles; Pruitt, Ronald; Cash, Brooks D.; Quirk, Daniel; Tiongco, Felix; Sullivan, Shelby; Bernstein, David; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. Methods We performed a randomized double-blind comparison of remimazolam to placebo for outpatient colonoscopy. This study design was a requirement of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. An additional group was randomized to open-label midazolam administered according to its package insert instructions (randomization ratio for remimazolam:placebo:midazolam was 30:6:10). Study medications were administered under the supervision of the endoscopist, without any involvement of an anesthesia specialist. Patients were given 50 to 75 μg of fentanyl before receiving study medications. Patients who failed to achieve adequate sedation in any arm were rescued with midazolam dosed at the investigator’s discretion. The primary endpoint was a composite that required 3 criteria be met: completion of the colonoscopy, no need for rescue medication, and ≤5 doses of remimazolam or placebo in any 15-minute interval (≤3 doses of midazolam in any 12-minute interval in the open-label midazolam arm). Results There were 461 randomized patients in 12 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was met for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 91.3%, 1.7%, and 25.2% of patients, respectively (P< 0.0001 for remimazolam vs placebo). Patients administered remimazolam received less fentanyl, had faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function, were ready for discharge faster, and felt back to normal faster than patients with both placebo and midazolam. Hypotension was less frequent with remimazolam and hypoxia occurred in 1% of subjects with remimazolam or midazolam. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events. Conclusion Remimazolam can be safely administered under the supervision of endoscopists for outpatient colonoscopy and allows faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function compared with placebo (midazolam rescue) and midazolam.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in high risk colonoscopy: A randomized trial
    (Elsevier, 2021) Rex, Douglas K.; Bhandari, Raj; Lorch, Daniel G.; Meyers, Michael; Schippers, Frank; Bernstein, David; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Procedural sedation of ASA III/IV patients has increased risk. Remimazolam (an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine) has proven safe and efficient for outpatient colonoscopy sedation. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, multi-center, parallel group trial was performed, comparing remimazolam to placebo with an additional open-label arm for midazolam in procedural sedation of 79 ASA III/IV patients undergoing colonoscopy. This was the third of 3 Phase III trials for remimazolam in the procedural sedation program. The primary end point was the safety of remimazolam. Results: Of 79 patients randomized at 3 US sites, 77 underwent sedation and colonoscopy (31 received remimazolam, 16 placebo and 30 midazolam). Incidence and frequency of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable in all three treatment arms, and independent of ASA status. One TEAE leading to discontinuation and one serious TEAE were reported; both in the open label midazolam arm. The efficacy endpoint was achieved for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 87.1%, 0%, and 13.3% of patients (p<0.00001 for remimazolam versus placebo and versus midazolam, respectively). Conclusions: Remimazolam is safe and efficient in procedural sedation of high risk ASA patients undergoing colonoscopy, showing a safety profile comparable to that in low risk ASA.