Browsing by Author "Beswick, Daniel M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating Distance Bias in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Outcomes
    (American Medical Association, 2022) Gill, Amarbir S.; Beswick, Daniel M.; Mace, Jess C.; Menjivar, Dennis; Ashby, Shaelene; Rimmer, Ryan A.; Ramakrishnan, Vijay R.; Soler, Zachary M.; Alt, Jeremiah A.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Importance: The distance traveled by patients for medical care is associated with patient outcomes (ie, distance bias) and is a limitation in outcomes research. However, to date, distance bias has not been examined in rhinologic studies. Objective: To evaluate the association of distance traveled by a cohort of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with baseline disease severity and treatment outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 505 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were prospectively enrolled in a multi-institutional, cross-sectional study in academic tertiary care centers between April 2011 and January 2020. Participants self-selected continued appropriate medical therapy or endoscopic sinus surgery. The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6-D (SF-6D) health utility value scores were recorded at enrollment and follow-up. Data on the distances traveled by patients to the medical centers, based on residence zip codes, and medical comorbid conditions were collected. Exposures: Distance traveled by patient to obtain rhinologic care. Main outcomes and measures: SNOT-22 and SF-6D scores. Scores for SNOT-22 range from 0 to 110; and for SF-6D, from 0.0 to 1.0. Higher SNOT-22 total scores indicate worse overall symptom severity. Higher SF-6D scores indicate better overall health utility; 1.0 represents perfect health and 0.0 represents death. Results: The median age for the 505 participants was 56.0 years (IQR, 41.0-64.0 years), 261 were men (51.7%), 457 were White (90.5%), and 13 were Hispanic or Latino (2.6%). These categories were collected according to criteria described and required by the National Institutes of Health and therefore do not equal the entire cohort. Patients traveled a median distance of 31.6 miles (50.6 km) (IQR, 12.2-114.5 miles [19.5-183.2 km]). Baseline (r = 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00-0.18) and posttreatment (r = 0.01; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.10) SNOT-22 scores, as well as baseline (r = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.04) and posttreatment (r = 0.07; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.16) SF-6D scores, were not associated with distance. There was no clinically meaningful correlation between distance traveled and mean comorbidity burden. Nevertheless, patients with a history of endoscopic sinus surgery were more likely to travel longer distances to obtain care (Cliff delta = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.38). Conclusions and relevance: Although this cross-sectional study found that some patients appear more willing to travel longer distances for chronic rhinosinusitis care, results suggest that distance traveled to academic tertiary care centers was not associated with disease severity, outcomes, or comorbidity burden. These findings argue for greater generalizability of study results across various cohorts independent of distance traveled to obtain rhinologic care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Olfactory Function After Surgical Treatment of CRS: A Comparison of CRS Patients to Healthy Controls
    (Sage, 2021) Mattos, Jose L.; Soler, Zachary M.; Schlosser, Rodney J.; Mace, Jess C.; Alt, Jeremiah A.; Ramakrishnan, Vijay R.; Payne, Spencer C.; Smith, Timothy L.; Beswick, Daniel M.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Many patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Few studies compare outcomes to control subjects so it is unknown if residual OD is due to persistent CRS. Objective: Compare postoperative measures of OD in case patients with CRS to healthy controls without sinonasal disease. Methods: Prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study between October, 2016 and May, 2019. Case participants were selected from referred adult patients diagnosed with CRS, with or without nasal polyposis (NP), electing ESS as subsequent treatment modality. Controls voluntarily enrolled from a community-based sample without a history of CRS. Primary outcomes included measures of preoperative and postoperative OD using "Sniffin' Stick" pens which summarize odorant threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) scores. Secondary outcomes included the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS) survey and olfactory cleft endoscopy scores (OCES). Results: Outcomes were compared between 113 cases and 164 controls of similar average age and gender. Cases reported significantly worse baseline Sniffin' Sticks TDI total scores (-6.8[SE ± 1.0]; 95% CI: -4.9 to -8.7), QOD-NS (8.9[SE ± 1.1]; 95% CI: 6.8-10.9), and OCES (3.5[SE ± 0.4]; 95% CI: 2.9-4.2) on average. Cases reported significant postoperative improvement in TDI total score (3.7[SD ± 8.2]; 95% CI: 2.2-5.2), QOD-NS (-5.9[SD ± 8.7]; 95% CI: -7.6 to -4.3), and OCES (-1.7[SD ± 3.8]; 95% CI: -2.7 to -0.8) on average, while 63% of anosmics reported improved postoperative olfaction. Multivariate regression identified that NP (OR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-1.0) and previous ESS (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8) decreased the odds of postoperative improvement equal to mean TDI scores of controls, while septoplasty increased those odds (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 1.5-13.7). Conclusion: ESS improved olfactory metrics and restored olfactory function in approximately 50% of patients with CRS to that of healthy controls. Concurrent septoplasty increased the likelihood of achieving normal olfaction, while NP and previous ESS decreased those odds.