Browsing by Author "Bermudez, Christian A."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: part 1 - Adult patients
    (Elsevier, 2019-11) Lorusso, Roberto; Raffa, Giuseppe Maria; Alenizy, Khalid; Sluijpers, Niels; Makhoul, Maged; Brodie, Daniel; McMullan, Mike; Wang, I-Wen; Meani, Paolo; MacLaren, Graeme; Kowalewski, Mariusz; Dalton, Heidi; Barbaro, Ryan; Hou, Xao-Tung; Cavarocchi, Nicholas; Chen, Yih-Sharng; Thiagarajan, Ravi; Alexander, Peta; Alsoufi, Bahaaldin; Bermudez, Christian A.; Shah, Ashish S.; Haft, Jonathan; D’Alessandro, David A.; Boeken, Udo; Whitman, Glenn J.R.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, acute respiratory failure, or a combination of such events, are all potential complications after cardiac surgery which lead to high mortality. Use of extracorporeal temporary cardio-circulatory and respiratory support for progressive clinical deterioration can facilitate bridging the patient to recovery or to more durable support. Over the last decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as the preferred temporary artificial support system in such circumstances. Many factors have contributed to widespread ECMO use, including the relative ease of implantation, effectiveness, versatility, low cost relative to alternative devices, and potential for full, not just partial circulatory support. While there have been numerous publications detailing the short and midterm outcomes of ECMO support, specific reports about post-cardiotomy ECMO (PC-ECMO), are limited, single-center experiences. Etiology of cardiorespiratory failure leading to ECMO implantation, associated ECMO complications, and overall patient outcomes may be unique to the PC-ECMO population. Despite the rise in PC-ECMO use over the past decade, short-term survival has not improved. This report, therefore, aims to present a comprehensive overview of the literature with respect to the prevalence of ECMO use, patient characteristics, ECMO management, and in-hospital and early post-discharge patient outcomes for those treated for post-cardiotomy heart, lung, or heart-lung failure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Part 2—pediatric patients
    (Elsevier, 2019) Lorusso, Roberto; Raffa, Giuseppe Maria; Kowalewski, Mariusz; Alenizy, Khalid; Sluijpers, Niels; Makhoul, Maged; Brodie, Daniel; McMullan, Mike; Wang, I-Wen; Meani, Paolo; MacLaren, Graeme; Dalton, Heidi; Barbaro, Ryan; Hou, Xaotong; Cavarocchi, Nicholas; Chen, Yih-Sharng; Thiagarajan, Ravi; Alexander, Peta; Alsoufi, Bahaaldin; Bermudez, Christian A.; Shah, Ashish S.; Haft, Jonathan; Oreto, Lilia; D’Alessandro, David A.; Boeken, Udo; Whitman, Glenn; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is established therapy for short-term circulatory support for children with life-treating cardiorespiratory dysfunction. In children with congenital heart disease (CHD), ECMO is commonly used to support patients with post-cardiotomy shock or complications including intractable arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and acute respiratory failure. Cannulation configurations include central, when the right atrium and aorta are utilized in patients with recent sternotomy, or peripheral, when cannulation of the neck or femoral vessels are used in non-operative patients. ECMO can be used to support any form of cardiac disease, including univentricular palliated circulation. Although veno-arterial ECMO is commonly used to support children with CHD, veno-venous ECMO has been used in selected patients with hypoxemia or ventilatory failure in the presence of good cardiac function. ECMO use and outcomes in the CHD population are mainly informed by single-center studies and reports from collated registry data. Significant knowledge gaps remain, including optimal patient selection, timing of ECMO deployment, duration of support, anti-coagulation, complications, and the impact of these factors on short- and long-term outcomes. This report, therefore, aims to present a comprehensive overview of the available literature informing patient selection, ECMO management, and in-hospital and early post-discharge outcomes in pediatric patients treated with ECMO for post-cardiotomy cardiorespiratory failure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Impact of Donor Smoking on Primary Graft Dysfunction and Mortality after Lung Transplantation
    (American Thoracic Society, 2024) Diamond, Joshua M.; Cantu, Edward; Calfee, Carolyn S.; Anderson, Michaela R.; Clausen, Emily S.; Shashaty, Michael G. S.; Courtwright, Andrew M.; Kalman, Laurel; Oyster, Michelle; Crespo, Maria M.; Bermudez, Christian A.; Benvenuto, Luke; Palmer, Scott M.; Snyder, Laurie D.; Hartwig, Matthew G.; Todd, Jamie L.; Wille, Keith; Hage, Chadi; McDyer, John F.; Merlo, Christian A.; Shah, Pali D.; Orens, Jonathan B.; Dhillon, Gundeep S.; Weinacker, Ann B.; Lama, Vibha N.; Patel, Mrunal G.; Singer, Jonathan P.; Hsu, Jesse; Localio, A. Russell; Christie, Jason D.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Rationale: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Prior studies implicated proxy-defined donor smoking as a risk factor for PGD and mortality. Objectives: We aimed to more accurately assess the impact of donor smoke exposure on PGD and mortality using quantitative smoke exposure biomarkers. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients enrolled in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort between 2012 and 2018. PGD was defined as grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours after lung reperfusion. Donor smoking was defined using accepted thresholds of urinary biomarkers of nicotine exposure (cotinine) and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (4-[methylnitrosamino]-1-[3-pyridyl]-1-butanol [NNAL]) in addition to clinical history. The donor smoking–PGD association was assessed using logistic regression, and survival analysis was performed using inverse probability of exposure weighting according to smoking category. Measurements and Main Results: Active donor smoking prevalence varied by definition, with 34–43% based on urinary cotinine, 28% by urinary NNAL, and 37% by clinical documentation. The standardized risk of PGD associated with active donor smoking was higher across all definitions, with an absolute risk increase of 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 19.2%) by urinary cotinine, 5.7% (95% CI, −3.4% to 14.9%) by urinary NNAL, and 6.5% (95% CI, −2.8% to 15.8%) defined clinically. Donor smoking was not associated with differential post–lung transplant survival using any definition. Conclusions: Donor smoking associates with a modest increase in PGD risk but not with increased recipient mortality. Use of lungs from smokers is likely safe and may increase lung donor availability.