Browsing by Author "Beran, Azizullah"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Clinical characteristics and outcomes of autoimmune pancreatitis based on serum immunoglobulin G4 levels: A single-center, retrospective cohort study(Baishideng, 2023) Jaber, Fouad; Elfert, Khaled; Alsakarneh, Saqr; Beran, Azizullah; Jaber, Mohammed; Gangwani, Manesh Kumar; Abboud, Yazan; Medicine, School of MedicineAutoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a complex, poorly understood disease gaining increasing attention. "Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of AIP Based on Serum IgG4 levels," investigated AIP with a focus on serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 levels. The 213 patients with AIP were classified according to serum IgG4 levels: Abnormal (elevated) and normal. Patients with higher IgG4 levels exhibited a more active immune system and increased relapse rates. Beyond IgG4, the IgA levels and age independently contributed to relapse risk, guiding risk assessment and tailored treatments for better outcomes. However, limitations persist, such as no IgA correlation with IgG4 levels, absent data on autoantibody-positive AIP cases critical for Asian diagnostic criteria, and unexplored relapse rates in high serum IgG AIP by subtype. Genetic factors and family histories were not addressed. As the understanding and referral of seronegative AIPs increase, there's a growing need for commercially available, highly sensitive, and specific autoantibodies to aid in diagnosing individuals with low or absent serum IgG4 levels.Item Comparative Analysis of Resmetirom vs. FGF21 Analogs vs. GLP-1 Agonists in MASLD and MASH: Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials(MDPI, 2024-10-14) Ayesh, Hazem; Beran, Azizullah; Suhail, Sajida; Ayesh, Suhail; Niswender, Kevin; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) and Metabolic-Dysfunction Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) are linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, increasing liver-related morbidity and cardiovascular risk. Recent therapies, including Resmetirom, FGF21 analogs, and GLP-1 agonists, have shown promise. This network meta-analysis evaluates their comparative efficacy and safety. Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Included clinical trials addressed MASLD or MASH with Resmetirom, FGF21 analogs, or GLP-1 agonists. Statistical analyses used a random-effects model, calculating mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR), with heterogeneity assessed using τ2, I2, and Q statistics. Results: MASH resolution was significantly higher for FGF21 (RR 4.84, 95% CI: 2.59 to 9.03), Resmetirom showed the most significant reduction in MRI-PDFF (MD -18.41, 95% CI: -23.60 to -13.22) and >30% fat reduction (RR 3.56, 95% CI: 2.41 to 5.26). Resmetirom significantly reduced ALT (MD -15.71, 95% CI: -23.30 to -8.13), AST (MD -12.28, 95% CI: -21.07 to -3.49), and GGT (MD -19.56, 95% CI: -34.68 to -4.44). FGF21 and GLP-1 also reduced these markers. Adverse events were significantly higher with Resmetirom (RR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.74), while GLP-1 and FGF21 showed non-significant trends towards increased risk. Conclusions: Resmetirom and FGF21 show promise in treating MASLD and MASH, with Resmetirom particularly effective in reducing liver fat and improving liver enzymes. GLP-1 agonists also show benefits but to a lesser extent. Further long-term studies are needed to validate these findings and assess cost-effectiveness.Item Efficacy of Dietary Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis(MDPI, 2024-12-11) Haghbin, Hossein; Hasan, Fariha; Gangwani, Manesh Kumar; Zakirkhodjaev, Nurruddinkhodja; Lee-Smith, Wade; Beran, Azizullah; Kamal, Faisal; Hart, Benjamin; Aziz, Muhammad; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common condition that alters the quality of life of patients. A variety of dietary interventions have been introduced to address this debilitating condition. The low-FODMAP diet (LFD), gluten-free diet (GFD), and Mediterranean diet are examples showing efficacy. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare these interventions to find the best approach. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the available literature through 14 March 2024 in the following databases: Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE OVID, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Central. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used a random effects model and conducted a direct meta-analysis based on the DerSimonian-Laird approach and a network meta-analysis based on the frequentist approach. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The primary outcomes included IBS quality of life (IBS QOL) and IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS). Results: We finalized 23 studies including 1689 IBS patients. In the direct meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in any IBS score between GFD and either LFD or standard diet. Meanwhile, the LFD was statistically superior to the standard diet in the IBS-SSS (MD: -46.29, CI: -63.72--28.86, p < 0.01) and IBS QOL (MD: 4.06, CI: 0.72-7.41, p = 0.02). On ranking, the Mediterranean diet showed the greatest improvement in IBS-SSS, IBS-QOL, distension, dissatisfaction, and general life interference, followed by the LFD alone or in combination with the GFD. Conclusions: We demonstrated the efficacy of dietary interventions such as the LFD and Mediterranean diet in improving IBS. There is a need for large RCTs with head-to-head comparisons, particularly for the Mediterranean diet.Item Efficacy, safety, and impact on procedural outcomes of local anesthesia in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis(Taylor & Francis, 2024-07-29) Abosheaishaa, Hazem; Abdelghany, Abdelmalek; Abdallfatah, Abdallfatah; Mohamed, Doha; Bahbah, Ammar Ayman; Mohamed, Islam; Elfert, Khaled; Salem, Ahmed E.; Beran, Azizullah; Madkour, Ahmad; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the treatment of early stage gastrointestinal cancers. However, ESD can be associated with increased postprocedural pain and higher complication rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of local anesthesia. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of local anesthesia in ESD procedures. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4, with summary measures expressed as pooled odds ratios (OR) or mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Four randomized controlled trials with 296 patients undergoing ESD procedures were included. The use of local anesthesia did not significantly impact procedural time (mean difference = -2.05, 95% CI = -9.29, 5.18, I2 = 30%, P = 0.58). Lastly, the use of local anesthesia did not increase the risk of bleeding or other adverse events (P > 0.05) and decreased the incidence of bradycardia (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.95; I2 = 0%; P = 0.04). Conclusion: Our study found that the use of local anesthesia did not significantly affect the procedural time of ESD. However, it effectively reduced postoperative pain in some trials with no risk of increased incidence of adverse events.Item Gastrointestinal Variant of Lemierre's Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Analysis of 36 Case Reports(Elsevier, 2024) Jaber, Fouad; Alsakarneh, Saqr; Alsharaeh, Tala; Salahat, Ahmed-Jordan; Elfert, Khaled; Beran, Azizullah; Gangwani, Manesh K.; Abboud, Yazan; Al-sayyed, Leen; Madi, Mahmoud Y.; Jaber, Mohammad; Dahiya, Dushyant S.; Numan, Laith; Duong, Nikki; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: A gastrointestinal (GI) variant of Lemierre's syndrome (LS) involving Fusobacterium species causing pylephlebitis and possibly liver abscesses was recently identified. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on this variant. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched up to November, 2nd, 2023 for case reports or case series detailing the GI variant of LS. Data regarding demographics, clinical features, and management were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis, including means, standard deviations, and percentages. Results: The cohort included 36 patients (mean age 50.8 years; predominantly men 72%). Positive blood cultures were detected in 88.8% of cases, primarily growing Fusobacterium nucleatum (47.2%) and Fusobacterium necrophorum (33.3%). The GI tract was the primary infection source (58.3%), mostly related to diverticular disease (25%). Common manifestations were fever (86.1%), abdominal pain (72.2%), and leukocytosis (86.1%). Thrombosis involved the portal vein in 77.7%, with isolated portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (44.4%) and PVT extending to the superior mesenteric vein (30.5%). Liver abscesses were detected in 50% of cases, with positive aspirate cultures in 92.3%. Treatment included penicillin/penicillin-lactamase inhibitors alone (17%) and ertapenem alone (17%). Abscess drainage (13/18) resulted in complete/near-complete resolution in 83%. Long-term anticoagulation therapy was given in 75% of cases, commonly using vitamin K antagonists (59.2%). No deaths occurred. Conclusion: The GI variant of LS should be considered in patients with abdominal pain, fever, leukocytosis, and portal/superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Identifying Fusobacterium species in blood cultures and liver abscesses further supports the diagnosis. Management involves antibiotic therapy, abscess drainage, and long-term anticoagulation.Item In-Hospital Mortality and Morbidity in Cancer Patients with COVID-19: A Nationwide Analysis from the United States(MDPI, 2022-12-30) Abuhelwa, Ziad; Alsughayer, Anas; Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.; Beran, Azizullah; Sayeh, Wasef; Khokher, Waleed; Sajdeya, Omar; Khuder, Sadik; Assaly, Ragheb; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused significant mortality and mortality worldwide. There is limited information describing the outcomes of COVID-19 in cancer patients. Methods: We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2020 database to collect information on cancer patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the United States. Using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding system, adult (≥18 years) patients with COVID-19 were identified. Adjusted analyses were performed to assess for mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization among cancer patients. Results: A total of 1,050,045 patients were included. Of them, 27,760 had underlying cancer. Cancer patients were older and had more comorbidities. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate in cancer patients was 17.58% vs. 11% in non-cancer. After adjusted logistic regression, cancer patients had a 21% increase in the odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality compared with those without cancer (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.21, 95%CI 1.12−1.31, p-value < 0.001). Additionally, an increased odds in acute respiratory failure rate was found (aOR 1.14, 95%CI 1.06−1.22, p-value < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in the odds of septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mechanical ventilation between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences in the mean length of hospital stay and the total hospitalization charges between cancer and non-cancer patients. Conclusion: Cancer patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had increased odds of all-cause in hospital mortality and acute respiratory failure compared with non-cancer patients.Item Increasing trend of endoscopic drainage utilization for the management of pancreatic pseudocyst: insights from a nationwide database(Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2024) Elfert, Khaled; Chamay, Salomon; Dos Santos, Lamin; Mohamed, Mouhand; Beran, Azizullah; Jaber, Fouad; Abosheaishaa, Hazem; Nayudu, Suresh; Ho, Sammy; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground/aims: The pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) is a type of fluid collection that typically develops as a delayed complication of acute pancreatitis. Drainage is indicated for symptomatic patients and/or associated complications, such as infection and bleeding. Drainage modalities include percutaneous, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open drainage. This study aimed to assess trends in the utilization of different drainage modalities for treating PP from 2016 to 2020. The trends in mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and mean hospitalization costs were also assessed. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to obtain data. The variables were generated using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. Results: Endoscopic drainage was the most commonly used drainage modality in 2018-2020, with an increasing trend over time (385 procedures in 2018 to 515 in 2020; p=0.003). This is associated with a decrease in the use of other drainage modalities. A decrease in the hospitalization cost for PP requiring drainage was also noted (29,318 United States dollar [USD] in 2016 to 18,087 USD in 2020, p<0.001). Conclusion: Endoscopic drainage is becoming the most commonly used modality for the treatment of PP in hospitals located in the US. This new trend is associated with decreasing hospitalization costs.Item Is Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Safe and Effective after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis(MDPI, 2024-07-01) Alsakarneh, Saqr; Madi, Mahmoud Y.; Dahiya, Dushyant Singh; Jaber, Fouad; Kilani, Yassine; Ahmed, Mohamed; Beran, Azizullah; Abdallah, Mohamed; Al Ta’ani, Omar; Mittal, Anika; Numan, Laith; Goyal, Hemant; Bilal, Mohammad; Kiwan, Wissam; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground/Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has emerged as an alternative option for biliary drainage in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of EUS-HGS. In this comprehensive meta-analysis, we aim to study the safety and efficacy of EUS-HGS in cases of failed conventional ERCP. Methods: Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched to include all studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-HGS. Using the random effect model, the pooled weight-adjusted event rate estimate for clinical outcomes in each group were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success rates. Secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (AEs), rates of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and rates or re-intervention. Results: Our analysis included 70 studies, with a total of 3527 patients. The pooled technical and clinical success rates for EUS-HGS were 98.1% ([95% CI, 97.5–98.7]; I2 = 40%) and 98.1% ([95% CI, 97.5–98.7]; I2 = 40%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of AEs with EUS-HGS was 14.9% (95% CI, 12.7–17.1), with bile leakage being the most common (2.4% [95% CI, 1.7–3.2]). The pooled incidence of RBO was 15.8% [95% CI, 12.2–19.4], with a high success rate for re-intervention (97.5% [95% CI, 94.7–100]). Conclusions: Our analysis showed high technical and clinical success rates of EUS-HGS, making it a feasible and effective alternative to ERCP. The ongoing development of dedicated devices and techniques is expected to make EUS-HGS more accessible and safer for patients in need of biliary drainage.Item Predictors of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis(Elsevier, 2024) Beran, Azizullah; Aboursheid, Tarek; Ali, Adel Hajj; Nayfeh, Tarek; Albunni, Hashem; Vargas, Alejandra; Mohamed, Mouhand F.; Elfert, Khaled; Shaear, Mohammad; Obaitan, Ite; Saleem, Nasir; Ahmed, Awais; Gromski, Mark A.; DeWitt, John M.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Watkins, James L.; Fogel, Evan; Easler, Jeffrey J.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground & Aims Pancreatitis is the most common serious adverse event associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This meta-analysis aimed to precisely assess the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods We searched electronic databases for studies that assessed risk factors for PEP after adjusting for ≥3 risk factors, including at least one pre-specified patient-related and one procedure-related risk factor, and reported the data as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, and pooled adjusted ORs for risk factors reported in ≥3 studies were constructed. Results A total of 159 studies with 315,580 ERCPs were included, assessing 31 unique risk factors (20 patient-related and 11 procedure-related). Key patient-related predictors of PEP were age ≤60 years (OR, 1.81; high credibility), prior acute pancreatitis (OR, 2.59; moderate), age ≤40 years (OR, 2.33; moderate), asymptomatic choledocholithiasis (OR, 4.76; low), prior PEP (OR, 4.40; low), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR, 3.11; low), and female gender (OR, 1.70; low). Key procedure-related predictors of PEP were any guidewire passage into the pancreatic duct (PD) (OR, 2.18; high), first ERCP with a native papilla (OR, 1.91; high), endoscopic papillary balloon dilation of an intact papilla (OR, 2.91; moderate), pancreatic acinarization (OR, 4.23; low), any PD cannulation (OR, 2.73; low), pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR, 2.64; low), difficult cannulation (OR, 2.60; low), any pancreatogram (OR, 2.40; low), and precut sphincterotomy (OR, 1.98; low). Conclusions Our meta-analysis focused on adjusted risk factors to provide precise estimates of the most important risk factors for PEP. Incorporating our results into a prediction model may reliably help identify high-risk patients, optimize informed consent, and guide prevention and management strategies for PEP.Item Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 51,834 patients(Taylor & Francis, 2023-01-17) Beran, Azizullah; Mhanna, Asmaa; Mhanna, Mohammed; Hassouneh, Ramzi; Abuhelwa, Ziad; Mohamed, Mouhand F. H.; Sayeh, Wasef; Musallam, Rami; Assaly, Ragheb; Abdeljawad, Khaled; Medicine, School of MedicineSARS-CoV-2 vaccinations were found to be highly effective in phase 3 clinical trials. However, these trials have not reported data regarding the subgroup of liver disease or excluded patients with liver disease. The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among liver cirrhosis (LC) patients is unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LC patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to include all the relevant studies that compared the outcomes of LC patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines vs. unvaccinated patients. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. Four studies with 51,834 LC patients (20,689 patients received at least one dose vs 31,145 were unvaccinated) were included. COVID-19–related complications, including hospitalization (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59–0.91, P = 0.004), mortality (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16–0.55, P = 0.0001), and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11–0.77, P = 0.01), were significantly lower in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LC patients reduced COVID-19–related mortality, intubation, and hospitalization. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is highly effective in LC. Further prospective studies, preferably randomized controlled trials, are necessary to validate our findings and determine which vaccine is superior in patients with LC.