- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Becker, David"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Assessing the Quality Measure for Follow-up Care After Children’s Psychiatric Hospitalizations(AAP, 2019-11) Blackburn, Justin; Sharma, Pradeep; Corvey, Kathryn; Morrisey, Michael A.; Menachemi, Nir; Sen, Bisakha; Caldwell, Cathy; Becker, David; Health Policy and Management, School of Public HealthOBJECTIVES: Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program plans publicly report quality measures, including follow-up care after psychiatric hospitalization. We aimed to understand failure to meet this measure, including measurement definitions and enrollee characteristics, while investigating how follow-up affects subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS: Administrative data representing Alabama’s Children’s Health Insurance Program from 2013 to 2016 were used to identify qualifying psychiatric hospitalizations and follow-up care with a mental health provider within 7 to 30 days of discharge. Using relaxed measure definitions, follow-up care was extended to include visits at 45 to 60 days and visits to a primary care provider. Logit regressions estimated enrollee characteristics associated with follow-up care and, separately, the likelihood of subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations and/or ED visits within 30, 60, and 120 days. RESULTS: We observed 1072 psychiatric hospitalizations during the study period. Of these, 356 (33.2%) received follow-up within 7 days and 566 (52.8%) received it within 30 days. Relaxed measure definitions captured minimal additional follow-up visits. The likelihood of follow-up was lower for both 7 days (−18 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI] −26 to −10 percentage points) and 30 days (−26 percentage points; 95% CI −35 to −17 percentage points) regarding hospitalization stays of ≥8 days. Meeting the measure reduced the likelihood of subsequent psychiatric hospitalizations within 60 days by 3 percentage points (95% CI −6 to −1 percentage point). CONCLUSIONS: Among children, receipt of timely follow-up care after a psychiatric hospitalization is low and not sensitive to measurement definitions. Follow-up care may reduce the need for future psychiatric hospitalizations and/or ED visits.Item Impact of Mental Health Parity & Addiction Equity Act on Costs & Utilization in Alabama's Children's Health Insurance Program(Elsevier, 2018) Sen, Bisakha; Blackburn, Justin; Morrisey, Michael A.; Kilgore, Meredith; Menachemi, Nir; Caldwell, Cathy; Becker, David; Health Policy and Management, School of Public HealthObjective: The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 mandates equivalent insurance coverage for mental-health (MH) and substance-use disorders (SUD) to other medical and surgical services covered by group insurance plans, Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs (CHIP). We explored the impact of MHPAEA on enrollees in ALL Kids, the Alabama CHIP. Methods: We use All Kids claims data for October 2008-December 2014. October 2008 through September 2009 marks the period prior to MHPAEA implementation. We evaluated changes in MH/SUD related utilization and program costs, and changes in racial/ethnic disparities in the use of MH/SUD services for ALL Kids enrollees, using two-part models. This allowed analyses of changes from no use to any use, as well as in intensity of use. Results: No significant effect is found on overall MH service-use. There are statistically significant increases in for inpatient visits and length of stay, and some increase in overall MH costs. These increases may not be clinically important, and are concentrated in 2009-2011. Disparities in utilization between African-American and non-Hispanic white enrollees are somewhat exacerbated, while disparities between other minorities and non-Hispanic whites are reduced. Conclusions: Findings indicate that MHPAEA led to a 14.3% increase in inpatient visits, a 12.5% increase in length of inpatient stay, and a 7.8% increase in MH costs. The increases appear limited to 2009-2011, suggesting existing pent-up ‘needs’ among enrollees for added MH/SUD services that resulted in a temporary spike in service use and cost immediately after MHPAEA, and which subsequently subsided.Item Mood Disorder Episodes & Diagnosis in Different Settings: What Can We Learn?(Juniper, 2018) Sen, Bisakha; Blackburn, Justin; Morrisey, Michael A.; Kilgore, Meredith; Menachemi, Nir; Caldwell, Cathy; Becker, David; Health Policy and Management, School of Public HealthObjective: Over the past two decades in proportion of costs of mood disorders among children paid for by government insurance programs has increased substantially. The objective of this study is to gain a more in-depth understanding of patterns of mood disorder diagnosis (MDOD) among enrollees in the Alabama Children’s Health Insurance Program, ALL Kids. Method: A retrospective study using claims data from ALL Kids from 2008-2014 was conducted. The proportion of ‘initial’ MDOD incidents occurring in different care settings (inpatient/ED, physician’s office, outpatient), and the predictors of these incidents, were investigated. Patterns of repeated MDOD inpatient/ED incidents were examined. Results: Multinomial logistic regression results show black enrollees have higher relative risk ratios (RRR) of having a MDOD in inpatient/ED setting (RRR: 1.52, p< 0.01), as do Hispanics (RRR: 1.30, p< 0.01). Enrollees who receive the initial diagnosis in an inpatient/ED setting are at high risk of subsequent MDOD incidents in an inpatient setting/ED. There is no significant racial or ethnic difference in the subsequent number of inpatient/ED visits conditional on the location of the initial diagnosis. Conclusions: The pattern of repeated MDOD incidents in inpatient/ED settings may be indicative of acuity of conditions, lack of access to alternate sources of care for mood disorders, or poor adherence to treatment and inadequate home care. Enrollees who do have such an incident may be strong candidates for case management, potentially improving enrollee outcomes as well as reducing program costs by averting avoidable inpatient/ED MDOD incidents.