Browsing by Author "Barnett, William K."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    IUPUI Imaging Research Council
    (Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2012-04-13) Hutchins, Gary D.; Wilson, Kathryn J.; Sturek, Michael S.; Du, Eliza Y.; Fletcher, James W.; Long, Eric C.; Molitoris, Bruce A.; Johnson, Daniel P.; Day, Richard N.; Barnett, William K.; Palakal, Mathew J.
    Abstract The IUPUI Imaging Research Council was created by the IUPUI Vice Chancellor for Research to provide guidance and direction for expansion of research imaging initiatives across all Schools and Departments within IUPUI. The specific goals of the council are: • To encourage and coordinate collaboration among IUPUI researchers from different disciplines • To provide advice and guidance in the realization of highly competitive large grant proposals that will support and grow the IUPUI imaging efforts into major nationally and internationally recognized programs • To develop a strategic plan that will enable IUPUI to become nationally and internationally known as the place for imaging research and its applications • To determine strategic areas of strength and growth • To determine available and needed resources • To determine strategic external partnerships Activities organized by the council to date include sponsoring an IUPUI Imaging Research Workshop on November 17, 2011. This workshop consisted of invited presentations, a poster session, and working group breakout sessions. Working groups explored research opportunities and needs in four priority areas (neuroscience, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and remote sensing). The council has recently initiated a monthly seminar series and is actively developing an IUPUI research imaging strategic plan. For more information visit the IUPUI Imaging Research Initiative website at www.imaging.iupui.edu.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation
    (Cambridge University Press, 2018-10) Knosp, Boyd M.; Barnett, William K.; Anderson, Nicholas R.; Embi, Peter J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    This paper proposes the creation and application of maturity models to guide institutional strategic investment in research informatics and information technology (research IT) and to provide the ability to measure readiness for clinical and research infrastructure as well as sustainability of expertise. Conducting effective and efficient research in health science increasingly relies upon robust research IT systems and capabilities. Academic health centers are increasing investments in health IT systems to address operational pressures, including rapidly growing data, technological advances, and increasing security and regulatory challenges associated with data access requirements. Current approaches for planning and investment in research IT infrastructure vary across institutions and lack comparable guidance for evaluating investments, resulting in inconsistent approaches to research IT implementation across peer academic health centers as well as uncertainty in linking research IT investments to institutional goals. Maturity models address these issues through coupling the assessment of current organizational state with readiness for deployment of potential research IT investment, which can inform leadership strategy. Pilot work in maturity model development has ranged from using them as a catalyst for engaging medical school IT leaders in planning at a single institution to developing initial maturity indices that have been applied and refined across peer medical schools.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sustainability considerations for clinical and translational research informatics infrastructure
    (Cambridge University Press, 2018-10) Obeid, Jihad S.; Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter; Harris, Paul A.; Barnett, William K.; Anderson, Nicholas R.; Embi, Peter J.; Hogan, William R.; Bell, Douglas S.; McIntosh, Leslie D.; Knosp, Boyd; Tachinardi, Umberto; Cimino, James J.; Wehbe, Firas H.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    A robust biomedical informatics infrastructure is essential for academic health centers engaged in translational research. There are no templates for what such an infrastructure encompasses or how it is funded. An informatics workgroup within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards network conducted an analysis to identify the scope, governance, and funding of this infrastructure. After we identified the essential components of an informatics infrastructure, we surveyed informatics leaders at network institutions about the governance and sustainability of the different components. Results from 42 survey respondents showed significant variations in governance and sustainability; however, some trends also emerged. Core informatics components such as electronic data capture systems, electronic health records data repositories, and related tools had mixed models of funding including, fee-for-service, extramural grants, and institutional support. Several key components such as regulatory systems (e.g., electronic Institutional Review Board [IRB] systems, grants, and contracts), security systems, data warehouses, and clinical trials management systems were overwhelmingly supported as institutional infrastructure. The findings highlighted in this report are worth noting for academic health centers and funding agencies involved in planning current and future informatics infrastructure, which provides the foundation for a robust, data-driven clinical and translational research program.