Browsing by Author "Bailey, Spencer S."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of Root Resorption in Patients Treated With .018 Slot Brackets Versus Those Treated With .022 Slot Brackets
    (2002) Bailey, Spencer S.; Hohlt, William F.; Hathaway, Ronald; Baldwin, James J.; Parks, Edwin T.; Shanks, James C.
    Understanding the factors that increase patients susceptibility to orthodontically induced root resorption is of the utmost importance to the practicing clinician. Numerous studies have been conducted that investigated contributing and etiological factors that tend to increase the amount of external apical root resorption a patient may incur during orthodontic treatment. However, there has been little research that has attempted to determine if patients treated with different slot size orthodontic brackets exhibit the same amount of external apical root resorption. The purpose of this research was to determine if patients treated with the 0.018 x 0.025 slot size bracket and patients treated with the 0.022 x 0.028 exhibited similar amounts of external apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Pre and Post treatment panoramic films from 91 consecutively treated orthodontic patients from a private orthodontic practice were used for this study. Each case that was included in the study had been treated with standard edgewise brackets using the Tweed-Merrifield philosophy of treatment. Forty-three cases from the 0.018 group and 48 from the 0.022 group were obtained. Each film that was analyzed was blinded prior to measuring to minimize observer bias. Mitutoyo Digimatic® calipers accurate to the nearest tenth of a millimeter were used for obtaining tooth measurements. Measurements were made from the Cemento-enamel junction and from incisal/occlusal to most apical portion of each incisor and all first molars. Statistical analysis was performed and the results showed no significant correlation between the size of the bracket and the amount of root resorption. No significant correlations existed between the groups for patient age, time in treatment, gender, and angle classification. Statistically significant differences were noted for cases in which extraction of four bicuspids was performed. Subjects belonging to the extraction group demonstrated significantly more external apical root resorption than those in which extractions were not done. This study demonstrated that the incidence of EARR that a patient may incur during treatment is independent of the size of the slot of the orthodontic bracket.