Browsing by Author "Avigan, David"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adoptive Immunotherapy by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A CALGB Intergroup Phase II Study
    (Elsevier, 2006-07-01) Rini, Brian I.; Halabi, Susan; Barrier, Robert; Margolin, Kim A.; Avigan, David; Logan, Theodore; Stadler, Walter M.; McCarthy, Philip L.; Linker, Charles A.; Small, Eric J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    A graft-versus-tumor effect through nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (N-SCT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been reported. An Intergroup phase II trial was undertaken to define further the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of this approach in a multi-institutional setting, Patients with cytokine-refractory, metastatic RCC were treated with N-SCT. The conditioning regimen was fludarabine 30 mg · m−2 · d−1 on day (d) −7 through d −3 and cyclophosphamide 60 mg · kg−1 · d−1 on d −4 and d −3. Patients received 2-8 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized stem cells from a 6/6 HLA-matched sibling donor. Immunosuppression after transplantation included tacrolimus and methotrexate. Twenty-two patients were enrolled at 14 institutions. Greater than 90% donor T-cell chimerism was observed in 17 of 19 evaluable patients (89%) by d +120. No objective response was observed. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed in 11 patients (50%). Chronic GVHD was reported in 5 patients (23%). There was 1 patient death from liver failure secondary to chronic GVHD. Regimen-related mortality was 2 of 22 (9%; liver failure, sepsis). Median survival time was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 3.9-12.0 months) and the median time to progression was 3.0 months (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.2 months). N-SCT for metastatic RCC is feasible in a multi-institutional setting. Adequate donor T-cell engraftment was achieved in most patients before disease progression. A graft-versus-tumor effect was not observed in this study despite acute and chronic GVHD, thus highlighting the need for further understanding of this approach. Allogeneic SCT remains investigational in RCC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and acute leukemia
    (BioMed Central, 2016-12-20) Boyiadzis, Michael; Bishop, Michael R.; Abonour, Rafat; Anderson, Kenneth C.; Ansell, Stephen M.; Avigan, David; Barbarotta, Lisa; Barrett, Austin John; Van Besien, Koen; Bergsagel, Leif; Borrello, Ivan; Brody, Joshua; Brufsky, Jill; Cairo, Mitchell; Chari, Ajai; Cohen, Adam; Cortes, Jorge; Forman, Stephen J.; Friedberg, Jonathan W.; Fuchs, Ephraim J.; Gore, Steven D.; Jagannath, Sundar; Kahl, Brad S; Kline, Justin; Kochenderfer, James N.; Kwak, Larry W.; Levy, Ronald; de Lima, Marcos; Litzow, Mark R.; Mahindra, Anuj; Miller, Jeffrey; Munshi, Nikhil C.; Orlowski, Robert Z.; Pagel, John M.; Porter, David L.; Russell, Stephen J.; Schwartz, Karl; Shipp, Margaret A.; Siegel, David; Stone, Richard M.; Tallman, Martin S.; Timmerman, John M.; Van Rhee, Frits; Waller, Edmund K.; Welsh, Ann; Werner, Michael; Wiernik, Peter H.; Dhodapkar, Madhav V.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Increasing knowledge concerning the biology of hematologic malignancies as well as the role of the immune system in the control of these diseases has led to the development and approval of immunotherapies that are resulting in impressive clinical responses. Therefore, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a hematologic malignancy Cancer Immunotherapy Guidelines panel consisting of physicians, nurses, patient advocates, and patients to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical application of immunotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and acute leukemia. These recommendations were developed following the previously established process based on the Institute of Medicine’s clinical practice guidelines. In doing so, a systematic literature search was performed for high-impact studies from 2004 to 2014 and was supplemented with further literature as identified by the panel. The consensus panel met in December of 2014 with the goal to generate consensus recommendations for the clinical use of immunotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies. During this meeting, consensus panel voting along with discussion were used to rate and review the strength of the supporting evidence from the literature search. These consensus recommendations focus on issues related to patient selection, toxicity management, clinical endpoints, and the sequencing or combination of therapies. Overall, immunotherapy is rapidly emerging as an effective therapeutic strategy for the management of hematologic malignances. Evidence-based consensus recommendations for its clinical application are provided and will be updated as the field evolves.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Summary of the 2019 Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling
    (Elsevier, 2020-10) Holstein, Sarah A.; Howard, Alan; Avigan, David; Bhutani, Manisha; Cohen, Adam D.; Costa, Luciano J.; Dhodapkar, Madhav V.; Gay, Francesca; Gormley, Nicole; Green, Damian J.; Hillengass, Jens; Korde, Neha; Li, Zihai; Mailankody, Sham; Neri, Paola; Parekh, Samir; Pasquini, Marcelo C.; Puig, Noemi; Roodman, G. David; Samur, Mehmet Kemal; Shah, Nina; Shah, Urvi A.; Shi, Qian; Spencer, Andrew; Suman, Vera J.; Usmani, Saad Z.; McCarthy, Philip L.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Myeloma Intergroup has organized an annual workshop focused on minimal residual disease (MRD) testing and immune profiling (IP) in multiple myeloma since 2016. In 2019, the workshop took place as an American Society of Hematology (ASH) Friday Scientific Workshop entitled “Immune Profiling and Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma”. This workshop focused on four main topics: the molecular and immunological evolution of plasma cell disorders, the development of new laboratory- and imaging-based MRD assessment approaches, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy research, and the statistical and regulatory issues associated with novel clinical endpoints. In this report, we provide a summary of the workshop and discuss future directions.