Browsing by Author "Auerbach, Marc A."
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A Collaborative In Situ Simulation-based Pediatric Readiness Improvement Program for Community Emergency Departments(Wiley, 2017) Abulebda, Kamal; Lutfi, Riad; Whitfill, Travis; Abu-Sultaneh, Samer; Leeper, Kellie J.; Weinstein, Elizabeth; Auerbach, Marc A.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground More than 30 million children are cared for across 5,000 U.S. emergency departments (EDs) each year. Most of these EDs are not facilities designed and operated solely for children. A Web-based survey provided a national and state-by-state assessment of pediatric readiness and noted a national average score was 69 on a 100-point scale. This survey noted wide variations in ED readiness with scores ranging from 61 in low-pediatric-volume EDs to 90 in the high-pediatric-volume EDs. Additionally, the mean score at the state level ranged from 57 (Wyoming) to 83 (Florida) and for individual EDs ranged from 22 to 100. The majority of prior efforts made to improve pediatric readiness have involved providing Web-based resources and online toolkits. This article reports on the first year of a program that aimed to improve pediatric readiness across community hospitals in our state through in situ simulation-based assessment facilitated by our academic medical center. The primary aim was to improve the pediatric readiness scores in the 10 participating hospitals. The secondary aim was to explore the correlation of simulation-based performance of hospital teams with pediatric readiness scores. Methods This interventional study measured the Pediatric Readiness Survey (PRS) prior to and after implementation of an improvement program. This program consisted of three components: 1) in situ simulations, 2) report-outs, and 3) access to online pediatric readiness resources and content experts. The simulations were conducted in situ (in the ED resuscitation bay) by multiprofessional teams of doctors, nurses, respiratory therapists, and technicians. Simulations and debriefings were facilitated by an expert team from a pediatric academic medical center. Three scenarios were conducted for all teams and include: a 6-month-old with respiratory failure, an 8-year-old with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and a 6-month-old with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). A performance score was calculated for each scenario. The improvement of PRS was compared before and after the simulation program. The correlation of the simulation performance of each hospital and the PRS was calculated. Results Forty-one multiprofessional teams from 10 EDs in Indiana participated in the study, five were of medium pediatric volume and five were medium- to high-volume EDs. The PRS significantly improved from the first to the second on-site verification assessment (58.4 ± 4.8 to 74.7 ± 2.9, p = 0.009). Total adherence scores to scenario guidelines were 54.7, 56.4, and 62.4% in the respiratory failure, DKA, and SVT scenarios, respectively. We found no correlation between simulation performance and PRS scores. Medium ED pediatric volume significantly predicted higher PRS scores compared to medium-high pediatric ED volume (β = 8.7; confidence interval = 0.72–16.8, p = 0.034). Conclusions Our collaborative improvement program that involved simulation was associated with improvement in pediatric readiness scores in 10 EDs participating statewide. Future work will focus on further expanding of the network and establishing a national model for pediatric readiness improvement.Item Community-based in situ simulation: bringing simulation to the masses(BMC, 2019-12-21) Walsh, Barbara M.; Auerbach, Marc A.; Gawel, Marcie N.; Brown, Linda L.; Byrne, Bobbi J.; Calhoun, Aaron; Katz-Nelson, Jessica; Tay, Khoon-Yen; Whitfill, Travis; Kessler, David; Dudas, Robert; Nishisaki, Akira; Nadkarni, Vinay; Hamilton, Melinda; Pediatrics, School of MedicineSimulation-based methods are regularly used to train inter-professional groups of healthcare providers at academic medical centers (AMC). These techniques are used less frequently in community hospitals. Bringing in-situ simulation (ISS) from AMCs to community sites is an approach that holds promise for addressing this disparity. This type of programming allows academic center faculty to freely share their expertise with community site providers. By creating meaningful partnerships community-based ISS facilitates the communication of best practices, distribution of up to date policies, and education/training. It also provides an opportunity for system testing at the community sites. In this article, we illustrate the process of implementing an outreach ISS program at community sites by presenting four exemplar programs. Using these exemplars as a springboard for discussion, we outline key lessons learned discuss barriers we encountered, and provide a framework that can be used to create similar simulation programs and partnerships. It is our hope that this discussion will serve as a foundation for those wishing to implement community-based, outreach ISS.Item Improving Emergency Preparedness in Pediatric Primary Care Offices: A Simulation-Based Interventional Study(Academic Pediatric Association, 2022-09) Yuknis, Matthew L.; Abulebda, Kamal; Whitfill, Travis; Pearson, Kellie J.; Montgomery, Erin E.; Auerbach, Marc A.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineObjectives Pediatric emergencies pose a challenge to primary care practices due to irregular frequency and complexity. Simulation-based assessment can improve skills and comfort in emergencies. Our aim was improving pediatric office emergency preparedness, as measured by adherence to the existing American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement, and quality of emergency care in a simulated setting, as measured by performance checklists. Methods This was a single center study nested in a multicenter, prospective study measuring emergency preparedness and quality of care in 16 pediatric primary care practices and consisted of 3 phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. Baseline emergency preparedness was measured by checklist based on AAP guidelines, and quality of care was assessed using in-situ simulation. A report-out was provided along with resources addressing potential areas for improvement after baseline assessment. A repeat preparedness and simulation assessment was performed after a 6 to 10 month intervention period to measure improvement from baseline. Results Sixteen offices were recruited with 13 completing baseline and follow-up preparedness assessment. Eight of these sites also completed baseline and follow-up simulation assessment. Median baseline preparedness score was 70% and follow-up was 75.9%. Median baseline simulation performance scores were 37.4% and 35.5% for respiratory distress and seizure scenarios, respectively. Follow-up simulation assessment scores were 73% and 76.9% respectively (P = .001). Conclusions Our collaborative was able to successfully improve the quality of care in a simulated setting in a group of pediatric primary care offices over 6 to 10 months. Future work will focus on expansion and improving emergency preparedness.Item National preparedness survey of pediatric intensive care units with simulation centers during the coronavirus pandemic(Baishideng Publishing Group, 2020-12-18) Abulebda, Kamal; Ahmed, Rami A.; Auerbach, Marc A.; Bona, Anna M.; Falvo, Lauren E.; Hughes, Patrick G.; Gross, Isabel T.; Sarmiento, Elisa J.; Barach, Paul R.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: The coronavirus disease pandemic caught many pediatric hospitals unprepared and has forced pediatric healthcare systems to scramble as they examine and plan for the optimal allocation of medical resources for the highest priority patients. There is limited data describing pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) preparedness and their health worker protections. Aim: To describe the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness efforts among a set of PICUs within a simulation-based network nationwide. Methods: A cross-sectional multi-center national survey of PICU medical director(s) from children's hospitals across the United States. The questionnaire was developed and reviewed by physicians with expertise in pediatric critical care, disaster readiness, human factors, and survey development. Thirty-five children's hospitals were identified for recruitment through a long-established national research network. The questions focused on six themes: (1) PICU and medical director demographics; (2) Pediatric patient flow during the pandemic; (3) Changes to the staffing models related to the pandemic; (4) Use of personal protective equipment (PPE); (5) Changes in clinical practice and innovations; and (6) Current modalities of training including simulation. Results: We report on survey responses from 22 of 35 PICUs (63%). The majority of PICUs were located within children's hospitals (87%). All PICUs cared for pediatric patients with COVID-19 at the time of the survey. The majority of PICUs (83.4%) witnessed decreases in non-COVID-19 patients, 43% had COVID-19 dedicated units, and 74.6% pivoted to accept adult COVID-19 patients. All PICUs implemented changes to their staffing models with the most common changes being changes in COVID-19 patient room assignment in 50% of surveyed PICUs and introducing remote patient monitoring in 36% of the PICU units. Ninety-five percent of PICUs conducted training for donning and doffing of enhanced PPE. Even 6 months into the pandemic, one-third of PICUs across the United States reported shortages in PPE. The most common training formats for PPE were hands-on training (73%) and video-based content (82%). The most common concerns related to COVID-19 practice were changes in clinical protocols and guidelines (50%). The majority of PICUs implemented significant changes in their airway management (82%) and cardiac arrest management protocols in COVID-19 patients (68%). Simulation-based training was the most commonly utilized training modality (82%), whereas team training (73%) and team dynamics (77%) were the most common training objectives. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of surveyed PICUs reported on large changes in their preparedness and training efforts before and during the pandemic. PICUs implemented broad strategies including modifications to staffing, PPE usage, workflow, and clinical practice, while using simulation as the preferred training modality. Further research is needed to advance the level of preparedness, support staff assuredness, and support deep learning about which preparedness actions were effective and what lessons are needed to improve PICU care and staff protection for the next COVID-19 patient waves.Item A National US Survey of Pediatric Emergency Department Coronavirus Pandemic Preparedness(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-12-17) Auerbach, Marc A.; Abulebda, Kamal; Bona, Anna Mary; Falvo, Lauren; Hughes, Patrick G.; Wagner, Michael; Barach, Paul R.; Ahmed, Rami A.; Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineObjective: We aim to describe the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness efforts among a diverse set of pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) within the United States. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter survey of PED medical director(s) from selected children's hospitals recruited through a long established national research network. The questionnaire was developed by physicians with expertise in pediatric emergency medicine, disaster readiness, human factors, and survey development. Thirty-five children's hospitals were identified for recruitment through an established national research network. Results: We report on survey responses from 25 (71%) of 35 PEDs, of which 64% were located within academic children's hospitals. All PEDs witnessed decreases in non-COVID-19 patients, 60% had COVID-19-dedicated units, and 32% changed their unit pediatric patient age to include adult patients. All PEDs implemented changes to their staffing model, with the most common change impacting their physician staffing (80%) and triaging model (76%). All PEDs conducted training for appropriate donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE), and 62% reported shortages in PPE. The majority implemented changes in the airway management protocols (84%) and cardiac arrest management in COVID patients (76%). The most common training modalities were video/teleconference (84%) and simulation-based training (72%). The most common learning objectives were team dynamics (60%), and PPE and individual procedural skills (56%). Conclusions: This national survey provides insight into PED preparedness efforts, training innovations, and practice changes implemented during the start of COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatric emergency departments implemented broad strategies including modifications to staffing, workflow, and clinical practice while using video/teleconference and simulation as preferred training modalities. Further research is needed to advance the level of preparedness and support deep learning about which preparedness actions were effective for future pandemics.Item Preparedness for Pediatric Office Emergencies: A Multicenter, Simulation-Based Study(AAP, 2021-09) Abulebda, Kamal; Yuknis, Matthew L.; Whitfill, Travis; Montgomery, Erin E.; Pearson, Kellie J.; Rousseau, Rosa; Diaz, Maria Carmen G.; Brown, Linda L.; Wing, Robyn; Tay, Khoon-Yen; Good, Grace L.; Malik, Rabia N.; Garrow, Amanda L.; Zaveri, Pavan P.; Thomas, Eileen; Makharashvili, Ana; Burns, Rebekah A.; Lavoie, Megan; Auerbach, Marc A.; Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS); Pediatrics, School of MedicineOBJECTIVES Pediatric emergencies can occur in pediatric primary care offices. However, few studies have measured emergency preparedness, or the processes of emergency care, provided in the pediatric office setting. In this study, we aimed to measure emergency preparedness and care in a national cohort of pediatric offices. METHODS This was a multicenter study conducted over 15 months. Emergency preparedness scores were calculated as a percentage adherence to 2 checklists on the basis of the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines (essential equipment and supplies and policies and protocols checklists). To measure the quality of emergency care, we recruited office teams for simulation sessions consisting of 2 patients: a child with respiratory distress and a child with a seizure. An unweighted percentage of adherence to checklists for each case was calculated. RESULTS Forty-eight teams from 42 offices across 9 states participated. The mean emergency preparedness score was 74.7% (SD: 12.9). The mean essential equipment and supplies subscore was 82.2% (SD: 15.1), and the mean policies and protocols subscore was 57.1% (SD: 25.6). Multivariable analyses revealed that independent practices and smaller total staff size were associated with lower preparedness. The median asthma case performance score was 63.6% (interquartile range: 43.2–81.2), whereas the median seizure case score was 69.2% (interquartile range: 46.2–80.8). Offices that had a standardized process of contacting emergency medical services (EMS) had a higher rate of activating EMS during the simulations. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric office preparedness remains suboptimal in a multicenter cohort, especially in smaller, independent practices. Academic and community partnerships using simulation can help address gaps and implement important processes like contacting EMS.Item State and National Estimates of the Cost of Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Lives Saved(American Medical Association, 2024-11-04) Newgard, Craig D.; Lin, Amber; Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.; Remick, Katherine E.; Gausche-Hill, Marianne; Burd, Randall S.; Malveau, Susan; Cook, Jennifer N. B.; Jenkins, Peter C.; Ames, Stefanie G.; Mann, N. Clay; Glass, Nina E.; Hewes, Hilary A.; Fallat, Mary; Salvi, Apoorva; Carr, Brendan G.; McConnell, K. John; Stephens, Caroline Q.; Ford, Rachel; Auerbach, Marc A.; Babcock, Sean; Kuppermann, Nathan; Surgery, School of MedicineImportance: High emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness is associated with improved survival among children receiving emergency care, but state and national costs to reach high ED readiness and the resulting number of lives that may be saved are unknown. Objective: To estimate the state and national annual costs of raising all EDs to high pediatric readiness and the resulting number of pediatric lives that may be saved each year. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used data from EDs in 50 US states and the District of Columbia from 2012 through 2022. Eligible children were ages 0 to 17 years receiving emergency services in US EDs and requiring admission, transfer to another hospital for admission, or dying in the ED (collectively termed at-risk children). Data were analyzed from October 2023 to May 2024. Exposure: EDs considered to have high readiness, with a weighted pediatric readiness score of 88 or above (range 0 to 100, with higher numbers representing higher readiness). Main outcomes and measures: Annual hospital expenditures to reach high ED readiness from current levels and the resulting number of pediatric lives that may be saved through universal high ED readiness. Results: A total 842 of 4840 EDs (17.4%; range, 2.9% to 100% by state) had high pediatric readiness. The annual US cost for all EDs to reach high pediatric readiness from current levels was $207 335 302 (95% CI, $188 401 692-$226 268 912), ranging from $0 to $11.84 per child by state. Of the 7619 child deaths occurring annually after presentation, 2143 (28.1%; 95% CI, 678-3608) were preventable through universal high ED pediatric readiness, with population-adjusted state estimates ranging from 0 to 69 pediatric lives per year. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, raising all EDs to high pediatric readiness was estimated to prevent more than one-quarter of deaths among children receiving emergency services, with modest financial investment. State and national policies that raise ED pediatric readiness may save thousands of children's lives each year.Item Supporting the Quadruple Aim Using Simulation and Human Factors During COVID-19 Care(Wolters Kluwer, 2021) Wong, Ambrose H.; Ahmed, Rami A.; Ray, Jessica M.; Khan, Humera; Hughes, Patrick G.; McCoy, Christopher Eric; Auerbach, Marc A.; Barach, Paul; Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineThe health care sector has made radical changes to hospital operations and care delivery in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This article examines pragmatic applications of simulation and human factors to support the Quadruple Aim of health system performance during the COVID-19 era. First, patient safety is enhanced through development and testing of new technologies, equipment, and protocols using laboratory-based and in situ simulation. Second, population health is strengthened through virtual platforms that deliver telehealth and remote simulation that ensure readiness for personnel to deploy to new clinical units. Third, prevention of lost revenue occurs through usability testing of equipment and computer-based simulations to predict system performance and resilience. Finally, simulation supports health worker wellness and satisfaction by identifying optimal work conditions that maximize productivity while protecting staff through preparedness training. Leveraging simulation and human factors will support a resilient and sustainable response to the pandemic in a transformed health care landscape.