Browsing by Author "Ashare, Rebecca"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Caregiver Engagement in Serious Illness Communication in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Setting
    (Sage, 2024-10) Levoy, Kristin; Ashare, Rebecca L.; Ganta, Niharika; O'Connor, Nina; Meghani, Salimah H.; Ashare, Rebecca; School of Nursing
    Context Prolonged management of critical illnesses in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACH) makes serious illness communication (SIC), a clinical imperative. SIC in LTACH is challenging as clinicians often lack training and patients are typically unable to participate—making caregivers central. Objectives This qualitative descriptive study characterized caregiver engagement in SIC encounters, while considering influencing factors, following the implementation of Ariadne Labs’ SIC training at a LTACH in the Northeastern United States. Methods Clinicians’ documented SIC notes (2019-2020) were analyzed using directed content analysis. Codes were grouped into four categories generated from two factors that influence SIC—evidence of prognostic understanding (yes/no) and documented preferences (yes/no)—and caregiver engagement themes identified within each category. Results Across 125 patient cases, 251 SIC notes were analyzed. In the presence of prognostic understanding and documented preferences, caregivers acted as upholders of patients’ wishes (29%). With prognostic understanding but undocumented preferences, caregivers were postponers of healthcare decision-making (34%). When lacking prognostic understanding but having documented preferences, caregivers tended to be searchers, intent on identifying continued treatment options (13%). With poor prognostic understanding and undocumented preferences, caregivers were strugglers, having difficulty with the clinicians or family unit over healthcare decision-making (21%). Conclusion The findings suggest that two factors—prognostic understanding and documented preferences—are critical factors clinicians can leverage in tailoring SIC to meet caregivers’ SIC needs in the LTACH setting. Such strategies shift attention away from SIC content alone toward factors that influence caregivers’ ability to meaningfully engage in SIC to advance healthcare decision-making.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Cannabis Use on Least Pain Scores Among African American and White Patients with Cancer Pain: A Moderation Analysis
    (Dove Press, 2021-11-05) Meghani, Salimah H.; Quinn, Ryan; Ashare, Rebecca; Levoy, Kristin; Worster, Brooke; Naylor, Mary; Chittams, Jesse; Cheatle, Martin; School of Nursing
    Introduction: Based on many published reports, African American patients with cancer experience higher pain severity scores and lower pain relief than White patients. This disparity results from undertreatment of pain and is compounded by low adherence to prescribed non-opioid and opioid analgesics among African American patients with cancer. While nearly one in four patients use cannabis to manage cancer-related symptoms, less is known about how cannabis use influences pain relief in this patient population. Methods: This study is based on preliminary data from an ongoing study of longitudinal outcomes of opioid therapy among African American and White patients with cancer. Linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess the interaction of race and cannabis use on pain relief using "least pain" item scores from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) averaged across three time points. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: This analysis included 136 patients (49 African American, 87 White). Overall, 30.1% of the sample reported cannabis use for cancer pain. The mean "least pain" score on BPI was 3.3 (SD=2.42) on a scale of 0-10. African American patients had a mean "least pain" score 1.32±0.48 units higher (indicating lower pain relief) than White patients (p=0.006). Cannabis use did not have a significant main effect (p=0.28). However, cannabis use was a significant moderator of the relationship between race and "least pain" (p=0.03). In the absence of cannabis use, African Americans reported higher "least pain" scores compared to Whites (mean difference=1.631±0.5, p=0.001). However, this disparity was no longer observed in African American patients reporting cannabis use (mean "least pain" difference=0.587±0.59, p=0.32). Conclusion: These findings point to the possible role of cannabis in cancer pain management and its potential to reduce racial disparities. These findings are preliminary and further research into the role of cannabis in cancer pain outcomes is needed.