Browsing by Author "Aronoff, George R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hexasodium fytate for the treatment of calciphylaxis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extension
    (Elsevier, 2024-08-16) Sinha, Smeeta; Nigwekar, Sagar U.; Brandenburg, Vincent; Gould, Lisa J.; Serena, Thomas E.; Moe, Sharon M.; Aronoff, George R.; Chatoth, Dinesh K.; Hymes, Jeffrey L.; Carroll, Kevin J.; Alperovich, Gabriela; Keller, Laurence H.; Perelló, Joan; Gold, Alex; Chertow, Glenn M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: In the CALCIPHYX trial, we investigated hexasodium fytate, an inhibitor of vascular calcification, for the treatment of calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis), a rare condition characterised by painful, non-healing skin lesions. Methods: In this international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with an ulcerated calciphylaxis lesion and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score ≥50/100 were randomised 1:1 to hexasodium fytate 7 mg/kg or placebo intravenously during maintenance haemodialysis. Primary efficacy outcomes were an 8-item modification of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT-CUA) and Pain VAS in the intention-to-treat population. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04195906. Findings: Overall, 34/37 patients randomised to hexasodium fytate and 26/34 patients randomised to placebo completed the 12-week randomised treatment period. At Week 12, both groups (hexasodium fytate versus placebo) showed similar improvements in BWAT-CUA (mean [standard deviation (SD)], -5.3 [5.2] versus -6.0 [6.2]; least squares mean difference, 0.3 [96% confidence interval (CI): -2.5, 3.0]; p = 0.88) and Pain VAS (mean [SD], -19.5 [26.9] versus -32.2 [38.5]; least squares mean difference, 11.5 [96% CI: -4.8, 27.8]; p = 0.15). One patient randomised to placebo briefly received hexasodium fytate in error. Serious adverse events through Week 12 included: calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation (2/38 [5%] versus 11/33 [33%]) and death (1/38 [3%] versus 5/33 [15%]). During the subsequent 12 weeks of open-label hexasodium fytate and 4 weeks of follow-up, there were no additional calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation. Over the course of the entire trial, deaths were 2/38 [5%] for the hexasodium fytate group and 7/33 [21%] for the placebo group. Interpretation: In patients with calciphylaxis, BWAT-CUA and Pain VAS improved similarly in hexasodium fytate- and placebo-treated patients; over the course of the entire trial, there were fewer deaths and calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation in the hexasodium fytate group.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Iron Administration, Infection, and Anemia Management in CKD: Untangling the Effects of Intravenous Iron Therapy on Immunity and Infection Risk
    (Elsevier, 2020-03-27) Ganz, Tomas; Aronoff, George R.; Gaillard, Carlo A. J. M.; Goodnough, Lawrence T.; Macdougall, Iain C.; Mayer, Gert; Porto, Graça; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.; Wish, Jay B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    dysfunction, increased exposure to infectious agents, loss of cutaneous barriers, comorbid conditions, and treatment-related factors (eg, hemodialysis and immunosuppressant therapy). Because iron plays a vital role in pathogen reproduction and host immunity, it is biologically plausible that intravenous iron therapy and/or iron deficiency influence infection risk in CKD. Available data from preclinical experiments, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials are summarized to explore the interplay between intravenous iron and infection risk among patients with CKD, particularly those receiving maintenance hemodialysis. The current evidence base, including data from a recent randomized controlled trial, suggests that proactive judicious use of intravenous iron (in a manner that minimizes the accumulation of non–transferrin-bound iron) beneficially replaces iron stores while avoiding a clinically relevant effect on infection risk. In the absence of an urgent clinical need, intravenous iron therapy should be avoided in patients with active infection. Although serum ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation can help guide clinical decision making about intravenous iron therapy, definition of an optimal iron status and its precise determination in individual patients remain clinically challenging in CKD and warrant additional study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Mezlocillin pharmacokinetics in renal impairment
    (1983) Aronoff, George R.