Browsing by Author "Anderson, Katelynn"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Adolescent with a Rare De Novo Distal Trisomy 6p and Distal Monosomy 6q Chromosomal Combination
    (Hindawi, 2020-08-31) Peterman, Leia A.; Vance, Gail H.; Conboy, Erin E.; Anderson, Katelynn; Weaver, David D.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    We report on a 12-year-old female with both a partial duplication and deletion involving chromosome 6. The duplication involves 6p25.3p24.3 (7.585 Mb) while the deletion includes 6q27q27 (6.244 Mb). This chromosomal abnormality is also described as distal trisomy 6p and distal monosomy 6q. The patient has a Chiari II malformation, hydrocephalus, agenesis of the corpus callosum, microcephaly, bilateral renal duplicated collecting system, scoliosis, and myelomeningocele associated with a neurogenic bladder and bladder reflux. Additional features have included seizures, feeding dysfunction, failure to thrive, sleep apnea, global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and absent speech. To our knowledge, our report is just the sixth case in the literature with concomitant distal 6p duplication and distal 6q deletion. Although a majority of chromosomal duplication-deletion cases have resulted from a parental pericentric inversion, the parents of our case have normal chromosomes. This is the first reported de novo case of distal 6p duplication and distal 6q deletion. Alternate explanations for the origin of the patient's chromosome abnormalities include parental gonadal mosaicism, nonallelic homologous recombination, or potentially intrachromosomal transposition of the telomeres of chromosome 6. Nonpaternity was considered but ruled out by whole exome sequencing analysis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease
    (Elsevier, 2024) Thorpe, Erin; Williams, Taylor; Shaw, Chad; Chekalin, Evgenii; Ortega, Julia; Robinson, Keisha; Button, Jason; Jones, Marilyn C.; Del Campo, Miguel; Basel, Donald; McCarrier, Julie; Davis Keppen, Laura; Royer, Erin; Foster-Bonds, Romina; Duenas-Roque, Milagros M.; Urraca, Nora; Bosfield, Kerri; Brown, Chester W.; Lydigsen, Holly; Mroczkowski, Henry J.; Ward, Jewell; Sirchia, Fabio; Giorgio, Elisa; Vaux, Keith; Peña Salguero, Hildegard; Lumaka, Aimé; Mubungu, Gerrye; Makay, Prince; Ngole, Mamy; Tshilobo Lukusa, Prosper; Vanderver, Adeline; Muirhead, Kayla; Sherbini, Omar; Lah, Melissa D.; Anderson, Katelynn; Bazalar-Montoya, Jeny; Rodriguez, Richard S.; Cornejo-Olivas, Mario; Milla-Neyra, Karina; Shinaw, Marwan; Magoulas, Pilar; Henry, Duncan; Gibson, Kate; Wiaf, Samuel; Jayakar, Parul; Salyakina, Daria; Masser-Frye, Diane; Serize, Arturo; Perez, Jorge E.; Taylor, Alan; Shenbagam, Shruti; Tayoun, Ahmad Abou; Malhotra, Alka; Bennett, Maren; Rajan, Vani; Avecilla, James; Warren, Andrew; Arseneault, Max; Kalista, Tasha; Crawford, Ali; Ajay, Subramanian S.; Perry, Denise L.; Belmont, John; Taft, Ryan J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1-∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.