Browsing by Author "Allison, Hannah"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Second Opinions in Breast Cancer Surgery: What Have We Learned?
    (Springer Nature, 2022-10-11) Beer, Meghan; Allison, Hannah; Fisher, Carla; Fan, Betty; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Second-opinion consultations (SOCs) provide many benefits. However, duplicate office visits and the logistics of transferring medical records may be concerning for delaying treatment. There is currently no clear understanding regarding the characteristics of patients with breast cancer who desire second surgical opinions or if this contributes to delays in care. Methods: A review of our institutional database from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, identified breast cancer patients who were documented to be SOCs or primary consultations (PC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients were excluded. Comparisons of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and surgery factors were performed using chi-square analysis. All analyses were two-tailed and statistical significance was assigned at p <0.05. This study was deemed IRB-exempt. Results: In our review, 158 breast cancer patients were identified, 21 (13.3%) SOCs and 137 (86.7%) PCs. Of the SOCs, 90% (19/21) underwent surgery at our institution. The study revealed an increased incidence of SOCs in those patients who ultimately underwent mastectomy (p=0.039) as well as those with lower pathologic T stage (p=0.021). There were no other differences in demographics, surgery, or tumor characteristics. No delay was seen in time for treatment. Conclusions: Patients who sought second opinions were more likely to undergo mastectomy and had lower pathologic tumor size. The time from biopsy to surgery appointment was longer in patients who sought second opinions but there were no differences in the time from biopsy or surgery appointment. It is encouraging that those who sought second opinions did not face any delay in care once established.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Uncovering the Overlap of Global and Domestic Rural Surgery for Medical Trainees
    (Elsevier, 2022) Bhatia, Manisha B.; Darkwa, Louis; Simon, Chad; Li, Helen W.; Allison, Hannah; Sparks Joplin, Tasha; Meade, Zachary S.; Keung, Connie; McDow, Alexandria D.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Medical trainees who participate in global rotations demonstrate improved cultural sensitivity, increased involvement in humanitarian efforts, and ability to adapt to limited resources. The global coronavirus pandemic halted global rotations for medical trainees. Domestic rural surgery (DRS) may offer a unique alternative. We aimed to understand medical students' perceptions of the similarities and differences between global surgery and DRS and how students' priorities impact career choices. Methods: An electronic survey was administered at eleven medical training institutions in Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan in spring 2021. Mixed methods analysis was performed for students who reported an interest in global surgery. Quantitative analysis was completed using Stata 16.1. Results: Of the 697 medical student respondents, 202 were interested in global surgery. Of those, only 18.3% were also interested in DRS. Students interested in DRS had more rural exposures. Rural exposures associated with DRS interest were pre-clinical courses (P = 0.002), clinical rotations (P = 0.045), and rural health interest groups (P < 0.001). Students interested in DRS and those unsure were less likely to prioritize careers involving teaching or research, program prestige, perceived career advancement, and well-equipped facilities. The students who were unsure were willing to utilize DRS exposures. Conclusions: Students interested in global surgery express a desire to practice in low-resource settings. Increased DRS exposures may help students to understand the overlap between global surgery and DRS when it comes to working with limited resources, achieving work-life balance and practice location.