- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Allen, Bradley L."
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item 1137. What Do We Know? Teaching Medical Students to Deal with Uncertainty as a Pandemic Unfolds(Oxford, 2020-10) Bauer, Margaret E.; Trujillo, Daniel; Brown, Cameron; Gomez, Martiza; Davidson, Darrell; Relich, Ryan F.; Allen, Bradley L.; Microbiology and Immunology, School of MedicineBackground The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on medical student education. As the pandemic spread nationwide, numerous universities shut down with only days’ notice, and medical students were removed from all patient care settings and restricted from campuses. Yet, the need and curiosity of these future physicians to understand this new disease was great, including how to interpret and integrate rapidly evolving information on the underlying viral and immune mechanisms, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. Time students spent away from patient care settings presented an opportunity to rapidly develop and deliver new curriculum covering SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Methods A team of students and faculty at Indiana University developed a Fundamentals of COVID-19 course that included up-to-date information on the virology, immunology, and pathophysiology of COVID-19. The course was delivered online, with both synchronous and asynchronous activities. Virology and immunology of the coronavirus family, including current knowledge to-date of SARS-CoV-2, were delivered using a series of readings and brief videos, followed by a small group exercise that required students to choose and present to their peers a paper from the scientific literature on COVID-19. A similar approach was used to deliver content about the pathophysiology of COVID-19. To place the COVID-19 experience in context of other pandemics, students researched and educated their small group cohort on another historical pandemic. Results To measure course effectiveness, we administered a pre-course survey gauging students’ self-confidence in their knowledge of these topics; the same survey was administered after completion of the course. Surveys from 645 (89% of enrolled) 3rd and 4th year medical students who completed both surveys were analyzed. Results showed that the course elicited a 57% increase (p< 0.001) in students’ confidence in their knowledge of COVID-19 virology and immunology and a 64% increase (p< 0.001) in knowledge of the pathophysiology. Conclusion Data showed that the asynchronous content and group activities were successful in engaging and educating the students on foundational knowledge of COVID-19 and were an effective approach to rapidly evolving information when faced with a novel disease.Item Engaging All Stakeholders to Create a Trusted, Data-Driven, Process Improvement Approach to Addressing Learner Mistreatment(Taylor & Francis, 2022-09-15) Walvoord, Emily C.; Howenstine, Michelle S.; Allen, Bradley L.; Ribera, Amy K.; Nabhan, Zeina M.; Tori, Alvaro J.; Eichholtz, Rebekah D.; Dankoski, Mary E.; Family Medicine, School of MedicineProblem: Learner mistreatment has remained an ongoing challenge in academic medicine despite accreditation requirements mandating that every program has systems in place to prevent and respond to mistreatment. While efforts vary across institutions, much remains unanswered in the literature about best practices. Additionally, for the foreseeable future, challenges in the learning environment will likely continue and potentially worsen, given the confluence of multiple external stressors including the COVID-19 pandemic, faculty burnout and general political divisiveness in the nation. It is essential, therefore, to focus on indicators of improvement via process metrics such as knowledge and awareness of mistreatment policies and procedures, willingness to report, reasons for not reporting, and satisfaction with having made a report, while simultaneously focusing on the more complex challenge of eliminating mistreatment occurrences. Intervention: We describe the aspects of our mistreatment prevention and response system first implemented in 2017 along with process and outcome measures. The interventions included expanding our policy outlining appropriate conduct in the teacher-learner relationship; a graduated response protocol to allegations of mistreatment with a clear escalation approach; an online reporting system; a graduate medical education exit survey which mirrors the AAMC Graduation Questionnaire on mistreatment; a robust communication and professional development campaign; a comprehensive data dashboard; and a comprehensive summary report dissemination plan. Context: The interventions were implemented at the largest allopathic medical school in the U.S., with nine campuses across the state. The system is available to all learners, including medical students, graduate students, residents, and fellows. Impact: Both institutional and national data sources have informed the continuous improvement strategies. Data from internal reporting systems, institutional surveys, and national data are presented from 2017 to 2021. Findings include an increasing number of incidents reported each year, including confidential reports from students who include their contact information rather than report anonymously, which we view as an indicator of learner trust in the system. Our data also show consistent improvements in learners’ awareness of the policy and procedures and satisfaction with having made a report. We also include other data such as the nature of complaints submitted and timeliness of our institutional response. Lessons Learned: We present several lessons learned that may guide other institutions looking to similarly improve their mistreatment systems, such as a close partnership between faculty affairs, diversity affairs, and educational affairs leadership; communication, professional development, and training through multiple venues and with all stakeholders; easily accessible reporting with anonymous and confidential options and the ability to report on behalf of others; policy development guidance; data transparency and dissemination; and trust-building activities and ongoing feedback from learners.Item Exploiting the power of information in medical education(Taylor & Francis, 2021) Cutrer, William B.; Spickard, W. Anderson, III; Triola, Marc M.; Allen, Bradley L.; Spell, Nathan, III; Herrine, Steven K.; Dalrymple, John L.; Gorman, Paul N.; Lomis, Kimberly D.; Medicine, School of MedicineThe explosion of medical information demands a thorough reconsideration of medical education, including what we teach and assess, how we educate, and whom we educate. Physicians of the future will need to be self-aware, self-directed, resource-effective team players who can synthesize and apply summarized information and communicate clearly. Training in metacognition, data science, informatics, and artificial intelligence is needed. Education programs must shift focus from content delivery to providing students explicit scaffolding for future learning, such as the Master Adaptive Learner model. Additionally, educators should leverage informatics to improve the process of education and foster individualized, precision education. Finally, attributes of the successful physician of the future should inform adjustments in recruitment and admissions processes. This paper explores how member schools of the American Medical Association Accelerating Change in Medical Education Consortium adjusted all aspects of educational programming in acknowledgment of the rapid expansion of information.Item Scholarly Concentrations Program: A PRIME Approach to Addressing Care for the Medically Underserved and Vulnerable Populations(2022-04-28) Birnbaum, Deborah R.; Rojas, Michelle; Allen, Bradley L.; Wallach, Paul M.Examine how well the structure of the Scholarly Concentrations Program and content of each concentration relates to the goals of the federal Health Resources and Services Administration grant received to create more interest and prepare more medical school graduates to care for medically underserved and vulnerable populations. The grant funds the Primary Care Reaffirmation for Indiana Medical Education, or PRIME. project. A review of how concentrations align with the grant was conducted by reviewing program, concentration and course learning objectives and mapping to the grant objectives. Numerous concentrations were found to be an excellent fit, creating a PRIME opportunity to enhance the SC Program and move the needle on the grant objectives.Item Scholarly Concentrations: A Novel Platform for Delivery of Health Systems Science Exposure and Highlight Unique Learning Environments Across the Nine Campuses of Indiana University School of Medicine(2020-03-06) Allen, Bradley L.; Birnbaum, Deborah R.; Corson-Knowles, Daniel R.; Harrington, Maureen A.; Wallach, Paul M.Rapidly evolving challenges in health care mandate changes in the way health care professionals are educated. How do we integrate the need for new and different content into the medical school curriculum? One area of particular focus is called Health Systems Science. Health Systems Science is being called the 3rd leg of modern medical education to complement the foundational and clinical sciences curricula. IU School of Medicine is integrating Health Systems Science content into Scholarly Concentrations. Scholarly Concentrations is a program offering students longitudinal educational enhancement through coursework and scholarly work.Item The systemic inflammatory response to dental plaque(2010) Wahaidi, Vivian Y.; Kowolik, Michael J.; Galli, Dominique M.; Dowsett, Sherie A.; Allen, Bradley L.; Gregory, Richard L.Introduction: Bacteremia involving oral bacteria and the systemic inflammatory responses are mechanisms that could causally link oral and systemic diseases. Objective: To use an experimental gingivitis model (EGM) in 2 clinical studies to 1) examine the systemic inflammatory responses to dental plaque, and assess racial differences in these responses; 2) determine whether dental plaque accumulation causes bacteremia and subsequent systemic responses following toothbrushing. Additionally, a laboratory study was conducted to examine the interaction between circulating human neutrophils and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Methods: For both clinical studies, healthy adults, aged 18-31 years, were recruited. In the first study, black and white, males and females participated in a 21-day EGM; in the second study, white adults participated in a 7-day EGM. In both studies, subjects visited the clinic weekly for: 1) measurement of the plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI); 2) collection of peripheral blood samples to evaluate systemic markers of inflammation. In the second study, to analyze bacteremic episodes during the experimental phase, peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and at 0.5, 5, and 30 minutes post-toothbrushing. In the laboratory study, interactions between F. nucleatum and circulating neutrophils were examined using a luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence assay. Results: During the experimental phases of both clinical studies, PI and GI increased (p<0.05) with a correlation between PI and GI ≥0.79. In the first study, dental plaque accumulation resulted in a systemic response that manifested as changes (p<0.05) in the level of inflammatory markers, hematologic factors, markers of lipid metabolism, and markers of metabolic change. This systemic response differed between individuals of different gender and race. In the second study, bacteremic episodes and changes in hematologic factors were observed post-toothbrushing during the experimental phase. Activation of neutrophils with F. nucleatum, in the laboratory study, increased the levels of neutrophil chemiluminescence (p<0.05). Conclusions: Overall, the findings of these investigations may shed light on the mechanistic pathways by which oral infection may impose risk for systemic diseases and provide some evidence to support a possible causal association between oral and systemic diseases. The clinical significance of this in systemic inflammatory diseases requires further investigation.