- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Ali, Sumera Aziz"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry(Springer Nature, 2018-06-22) Saleem, Sarah; Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder; McClure, Elizabeth M.; Moore, Janet L.; Azam, Syed Iqbal; Dhaded, Sangappa M.; Goudar, Shivaprasad S.; Garces, Ana; Figueroa, Lester; Marete, Irene; Tenge, Constance; Esamai, Fabian; Patel, Archana B.; Ali, Sumera Aziz; Naqvi, Farnaz; Mwenchanya, Musaku; Chomba, Elwyn; Carlo, Waldemar A.; Derman, Richard J.; Hibberd, Patricia L.; Bucher, Sherri; Liechty, Edward A.; Krebs, Nancy; Hambidge, K. Michael; Wallace, Dennis D.; Koso-Thomas, Marion; Miodovnik, Menachem; Goldenberg, Robert L.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: Stillbirth rates remain high, especially in low and middle-income countries, where rates are 25 per 1000, ten-fold higher than in high-income countries. The United Nations' Every Newborn Action Plan has set a goal of 12 stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030 for all countries. Methods: From a population-based pregnancy outcome registry, including data from 2010 to 2016 from two sites each in Africa (Zambia and Kenya) and India (Nagpur and Belagavi), as well as sites in Pakistan and Guatemala, we evaluated the stillbirth rates and rates of annual decline as well as risk factors for 427,111 births of which 12,181 were stillbirths. Results: The mean stillbirth rates for the sites were 21.3 per 1000 births for Africa, 25.3 per 1000 births for India, 56.9 per 1000 births for Pakistan and 19.9 per 1000 births for Guatemala. From 2010 to 2016, across all sites, the mean stillbirth rate declined from 31.7 per 1000 births to 26.4 per 1000 births for an average annual decline of 3.0%. Risk factors for stillbirth were similar across the sites and included maternal age < 20 years and age > 35 years. Compared to parity 1-2, zero parity and parity > 3 were both associated with increased stillbirth risk and compared to women with any prenatal care, women with no prenatal care had significantly increased risk of stillbirth in all sites. Conclusions: At the current rates of decline, stillbirth rates in these sites will not reach the Every Newborn Action Plan goal of 12 per 1000 births by 2030. More attention to the risk factors and treating the causes of stillbirths will be required to reach the Every Newborn Action Plan goal of stillbirth reduction.Item Trends of antenatal care during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the global network maternal and newborn health registry(Elsevier, 2019) Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder; Ali, Sumera Aziz; Saleem, Sarah; Bann, Carla M.; Mwenechanya, Musaku; Carlo, Waldemar A.; Figueroa, Lester; Garces, Ana L.; Krebs, Nancy F.; Patel, Archana; Hibberd, Patricia L.; Goudar, Shivaprasad S.; Derman, Richard J.; Aziz, Aleha; Marete, Irene; Tenge, Constance; Esamai, Fabian; Liechty, Edward; Bucher, Sherri; Moore, Janet L.; McClure, Elizabeth M.; Goldenberg, Robert L.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: Antenatal care (ANC) is an important opportunity to diagnose and treat pregnancy-related complications and to deliver interventions aimed at improving health and survival of both mother and the infant. Multiple individual studies and national surveys have assessed antenatal care utilization at a single point in time across different countries, but ANC trends have not often been studied in rural areas of low-middle income countries (LMICs). The objective of this analysis was to study the trends of antenatal care use in LMICs over a seven-year period. Methods: Using a prospective maternal and newborn health registry study, we analyzed data collected from 2011 to 2017 across five countries (Guatemala, India [2 sites], Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia). Utilization of any ANC along with use of select services, including vitamins/iron, tetanus toxoid vaccine and HIV testing, were assessed. We used a generalized linear regression model to examine the trends of women receiving at least one and at least four antenatal care visits by site and year, controlling for maternal age, education and parity. Results: Between January 2011 and December 2017, 313,663 women were enrolled and included in the analysis. For all six sites, a high proportion of women received at least one ANC visit across this period. Over the years, there was a trend for an increasing proportion of women receiving at least one and at least four ANC visits in all sites, except for Guatemala where a decline in ANC was observed. Regarding utilization of specific services, in India almost 100% of women reported receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, vitamins/iron supplementation and HIV testing services for all study years. In Kenya, a small increase in the proportion of women receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine was observed, while for Zambia, tetanus toxoid use declined from 97% in 2011 to 89% in 2017. No trends for tetanus toxoid use were observed for Pakistan and Guatemala. Across all countries an increasing trend was observed for use of vitamins/iron and HIV testing. However, HIV testing remained very low (<0.1%) for Pakistan. Conclusion: In a range of LMICs, from 2011 to 2017 nearly all women received at least one ANC visit, and a significant increase in the proportion of women who received at least four ANC visits was observed across all sites except Guatemala. Moreover, there were variations regarding the utilization of preventive care services across all sites except for India where rates were generally high. More research is required to understand the quality and influences of ANC.