Browsing by Author "Ahles, Tim"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cancer-Related Cognitive Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study
    (ASCO, 2018-11) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Small, Brent J.; Luta, Gheorghe; Hurria, Arti; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Graham, Deena; Zhou, Xingtao; Clapp, Jonathan; Zhai, Wanting; Breen, Elizabeth; Carroll, Judith E.; Denduluri, Neelima; Dilawari, Asma; Extermann, Martine; Isaacs, Claudine; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Kobayashi, Lindsay C.; Holohan Nudelman, Kelly; Root, James; Stern, Robert A.; Tometich, Danielle; Turner, Raymond; VanMeter, John W.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Ahles, Tim; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Purpose To determine treatment and aging-related effects on longitudinal cognitive function in older breast cancer survivors. Methods Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 344) and matched controls without cancer (n = 347) 60 years of age and older without dementia or neurologic disease were recruited between August 2010 and December 2015. Data collection occurred during presystemic treatment/control enrollment and at 12 and 24 months through biospecimens; surveys; self-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; and neuropsychological tests that measured attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM). Linear mixed-effects models tested two-way interactions of treatment group (control, chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, and hormonal therapy) and time and explored three-way interactions of ApoE (ε4+ v not) by group by time; covariates included baseline age, frailty, race, and cognitive reserve. Results Survivors and controls were 60 to 98 years of age, were well educated, and had similar baseline cognitive scores. Treatment was related to longitudinal cognition scores, with survivors who received chemotherapy having increasingly worse APE scores (P = .05) and those initiating hormonal therapy having lower LM scores at 12 months (P = .03) than other groups. These group-by-time differences varied by ApoE genotype, where only ε4+ survivors receiving hormone therapy had short-term decreases in adjusted LM scores (three-way interaction P = .03). For APE, the three-way interaction was not significant (P = .14), but scores were significantly lower for ε4+ survivors exposed to chemotherapy (−0.40; 95% CI, −0.79 to −0.01) at 24 months than ε4+ controls (0.01; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18; P < .05). Increasing age was associated with lower baseline scores on all cognitive measures (P < .001); frailty was associated with baseline APE and self-reported decline (P < .001). Conclusion Breast cancer systemic treatment and aging-related phenotypes and genotypes are associated with longitudinal decreases in cognitive function scores in older survivors. These data could inform treatment decision making and survivorship care planning.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cognitive effects of cancer and its treatments at the intersection of aging: what do we know; what do we need to know?
    (Elsevier, 2013-12) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Hurria, Arti; McDonald, Brenna C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Stern, Robert A.; VanMeter, John W.; McGuckin, Meghan; Traina, Tiffani; Denduluri, Neelima; Turner, Scott; Howard, Darlene; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Ahles, Tim; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, IU School of Medicine
    There is a fairly consistent, albeit non-universal body of research documenting cognitive declines after cancer and its treatments. While few of these studies have included subjects aged 65 years and older, it is logical to expect that older patients are at risk of cognitive decline. Here, we use breast cancer as an exemplar disease for inquiry into the intersection of aging and cognitive effects of cancer and its therapies. There are a striking number of common underlying potential biological risks and pathways for the development of cancer, cancer-related cognitive declines, and aging processes, including the development of a frail phenotype. Candidate shared pathways include changes in hormonal milieu, inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage and compromised DNA repair, genetic susceptibility, decreased brain blood flow or disruption of the blood-brain barrier, direct neurotoxicity, decreased telomere length, and cell senescence. There also are similar structure and functional changes seen in brain imaging studies of cancer patients and those seen with "normal" aging and Alzheimer's disease. Disentangling the role of these overlapping processes is difficult since they require aged animal models and large samples of older human subjects. From what we do know, frailty and its low cognitive reserve seem to be a clinically useful marker of risk for cognitive decline after cancer and its treatments. This and other results from this review suggest the value of geriatric assessments to identify older patients at the highest risk of cognitive decline. Further research is needed to understand the interactions between aging, genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and frailty phenotypes to best identify the subgroups of older patients at greatest risk for decline and to develop behavioral and pharmacological interventions targeting this group. We recommend that basic science and population trials be developed specifically for older hosts with intermediate endpoints of relevance to this group, including cognitive function and trajectories of frailty. Clinicians and their older patients can advance the field by active encouragement of and participation in research designed to improve the care and outcomes of the growing population of older cancer patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cognitive impairment in older patients with breast cancer before systemic therapy: is there an interaction between cancer and comorbidity?
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014-06-20) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Stern, Robert A.; Luta, Gheorghe; McGuckin, Meghan; Clapp, Jonathan D.; Hurria, Arti; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Faul, Leigh Anne; Isaacs, Claudine; Denduluri, Neelima; Gavett, Brandon; Traina, Tiffany A.; Johnson, Patricia; Silliman, Rebecca A.; Turner, R. Scott; Howard, Darlene; Van Meter, John W.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Ahles, Tim; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: To determine if older patients with breast cancer have cognitive impairment before systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer and matched friend or community controls age > 60 years without prior systemic treatment, dementia, or neurologic disease. Participants completed surveys and a 55-minute battery of 17 neuropsychological tests. Biospecimens were obtained for APOE genotyping, and clinical data were abstracted. Neuropsychological test scores were standardized using control means and standard deviations (SDs) and grouped into five domain z scores. Cognitive impairment was defined as any domain z score two SDs below or ≥ two z scores 1.5 SDs below the control mean. Multivariable analyses evaluated pretreatment differences considering age, race, education, and site; comparisons between patient cases also controlled for surgery. RESULTS: The 164 patient cases and 182 controls had similar neuropsychological domain scores. However, among patient cases, those with stage II to III cancers had lower executive function compared with those with stage 0 to I disease, after adjustment (P = .05). The odds of impairment were significantly higher among older, nonwhite, less educated women and those with greater comorbidity, after adjustment. Patient case or control status, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and surgery were not associated with impairment. However, there was an interaction between comorbidity and patient case or control status; comorbidity was strongly associated with impairment among patient cases (adjusted odds ratio, 8.77; 95% CI, 2.06 to 37.4; P = .003) but not among controls (P = .97). Only diabetes and cardiovascular disease were associated with impairment among patient cases. CONCLUSION: There were no overall differences between patients with breast cancer and controls before systemic treatment, but there may be pretreatment cognitive impairment within subgroups of patient cases with greater tumor or comorbidity burden.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Deficit Accumulation Frailty Trajectories of Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study
    (Oxford University Press, 2021) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita J.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: We evaluated deficit accumulation and how deficits affected cognition and physical activity among breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. Methods: Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic survivors (n = 353) and matched non-cancer controls (n = 355) ages 60-98 years without neurological impairments were assessed presystemic therapy (or at enrollment for controls) from August 2010 to December 2016 and followed for 36 months. Scores on a 42-item index were analyzed in growth-mixture models to determine deficit accumulation trajectories separately and combined for survivors and controls. Multilevel models tested associations between trajectory and cognition (FACT-Cog and neuropsychological tests) and physical activity (IPAQ-SF) for survivors and controls. Results: Deficit accumulation scores were in the robust range, but survivors had higher scores (95% confidence intervals [CI]) than controls at 36 months (0.18, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.19, vs 0.16, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.17; P = .001), and averages included diverse deficit trajectories. Survivors who were robust but became frailer (8.8%) had similar baseline characteristics to those remaining robust (76.2%) but experienced a 9.6-point decline self-reported cognition (decline of 9.6 vs 3.2 points; P = .04) and a 769 MET minutes per week decline in physical activity (P < .001). Survivors who started and remained prefrail (15.0%) had self-reported and objective cognitive problems. At baseline, frail controls (9.5%) differed from robust controls (83.7%) on deficits and self-reported cognition (P < .001). Within combined trajectories, frail survivors had more sleep disturbances than frail controls (48.6% [SD = 17.4%] vs 25.0% [SD = 8.2%]; P = .05). Conclusions: Most survivors and controls remained robust, and there were similar proportions on a frail trajectory. However, there were differences in deficit patterns between survivors and controls. Survivor deficit accumulation trajectory was associated with patient-reported outcomes. Additional research is needed to understand how breast cancer and its treatments affect deficit accumulation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pre-treatment psychoneurological symptoms and their association with longitudinal cognitive function and quality of life in older breast cancer survivors
    (Elsevier, 2019-03) Tometich, Danielle; Small, Brent J.; Carroll, Judith E.; Zhai, Wanting; Luta, George; Zhou, Xingtao; Kobayashi, Lindsay C.; Ahles, Tim; Saykin, Andrew J.; Clapp, Jonathan D.; Jim, Heather S. L.; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Hurria, Arti; Graham, Deena; McDonald, Brenna C.; Denduluri, Neelima; Extermann, Martine; Isaacs, Claudine; Dilawari, Asma; Root, James; Rini, Christine; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Context Symptoms affect quality of life (QOL), functional status, and cognitive function in cancer survivors, but older survivors are understudied. Objectives To identify prototypical pre-systemic therapy psychoneurological symptom clusters among older breast cancer survivors, and determine whether these symptom clusters predicted cognition and QOL over time. Methods Women with newly diagnosed non-metastatic breast cancer (n=319) and matched non-cancer controls (n=347) aged 60+ completed questionnaires and neuropsychological tests before systemic therapy and 12- and 24-months later. Latent class analysis identified clusters of survivors based upon their pre-therapy depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain. Linear mixed-effects models examined changes in objective cognition, perceived cognition, and functional status (instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability, functional well-being, and breast cancer-specific QOL) by group, controlling for covariates. Results Nearly one-fifth of older survivors were classified as having a high pre-therapy symptoms (n=51; 16%); the remainder had a low symptoms (n=268; 84%); both groups improved over time on all outcomes. However, compared to the low symptom group and controls, survivors with high symptoms had lower baseline objective cognition and lower perceived cognition at baseline and 24-months, lower functional well-being at baseline and 12-months, greater IADL disability at baseline, and lower breast cancer-specific QOL at all time points (all p<0.05). Conclusion Nearly one-fifth of older breast cancer survivors had high psychoneurological symptoms at diagnosis, which, predict clinically meaningful decrements in perceived cognition and function in the first 24 months post-diagnosis. Pre-treatment psychoneurological symptom clusters could identify survivors for monitoring or intervention.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Protective Effects of APOE ε2 Genotype on Cognition in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study
    (Oxford University Press, 2021-01-27) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nudelman Holohan, Kelly; Patel, Sunita K.; Rebeck, G. William; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Carroll, Judith E.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: Cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) has been linked to apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene ε4 polymorphisms. APOE ε4 polymorphisms are also the strongest genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD), whereas ε2 polymorphisms protect against AD. However, the effects of ε2 polymorphisms on CRCD have not been evaluated. Methods: We evaluated nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 427) and matched noncancer controls (n = 407) ages 60-98 years assessed presystemic therapy from August 2010 to December 2017 with annual follow-up to 24 months. Neuropsychological assessment measured attention, processing speed, executive function, and learning and memory. Linear mixed-effects models tested the effects of having an ε2 allele (vs none) on longitudinal cognitive domain z scores by treatment group (chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, hormonal therapy, and control) controlling for covariates; participants with ε2/ε4 genotype were excluded. Sensitivity analyses examined effects of other covariates and any ε4 positivity. Results: There was an interaction with genotype for attention, processing speed, and executive functioning domain scores (Beta = 0.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.00 to 0.65); the chemotherapy group with an ε2 allele had higher scores at baseline and maintained higher scores over time compared with those without an ε2 allele, and this protective effect was not seen for other groups. There was no effect of ε2 on learning and memory domain scores. Conclusions: APOE ε2 polymorphisms may protect against CRCD in older breast cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. With replication, this information could be useful for survivorship care and informing future studies of possible links to AD and defining mechanisms of protection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Response to Dekker, Stege, and Versteeg
    (Oxford University Press, 2021) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita K.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine