Browsing by Author "Agrawal, Ankit"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Increased risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with COVID-19 pneumonia in comparison to influenza pneumonia: insights from the National Inpatient Sample database
    (AME, 2024) Raj, Kavin; Majeed, Harris; Chandna, Sanya; Chitkara, Akshit; Sheikh, Abu Baker; Kumar, Ashish; Gangu, Karthik; Pillai, Keerthana Jyotheeswara; Agrawal, Ankit; Sadashiv, Santhosh K.; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily a respiratory virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, induces a hypercoagulable state. Previous studies comparing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with influenza pneumonia revealed a higher risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, these studies have not adequately accounted for the severity and acuity of the presenting viral pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective study, we rigorously adjusted for critical illness using a nationally representative dataset to investigate whether COVID-19 pneumonia is independently linked to a higher risk of PE and DVT. Results: After comprehensive multivariate adjustment, our findings demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia maintained significantly higher odds of developing acute inpatient PE [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16-2.86; P<0.01] and DVT (aOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.41-1.96; P<0.01) during the early pandemic compared to patients with influenza pneumonia. Furthermore, we identified congenital heart disease and malnutrition as novel risk factors for acute PE in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the higher prevalence of acute inpatient PE over DVT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may support a "thrombus in situ" mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-mediated pulmonary thrombosis. Consequently, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for PE, even in the absence of DVT, among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and should follow evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Meta-analysis of ProGlide versus MANTA vascular closure devices for large-bore access site management
    (Elsevier, 2022) Mahalwar, Gauranga; Shariff, Mariam; Datla, Sanjana; Agrawal, Ankit; Rathore, Sawai Singh; Arif, Taha Bin; Iqbal, Kinza; Hussain, Nabeel; Majmundar, Monil; Kumar, Ashish; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: The comparative effectiveness of ProGlide® compared with MANTA® vascular closure devices (VCDs) in large-bore access site management is not entirely certain, and has only been evaluated in underpowered studies. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ProGlide® compared with MANTA® VCDs. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched systematically for relevant articles from the inception of the database until August 27, 2021. The outcomes of interest were all bleeding events, major bleeding, major and minor vascular complications, pseudoaneurysm, stenosis or dissection, and VCD failure. Risk ratios were used as point estimates of endpoints. All statistical analyses were carried out using R version 4.0.3. Results: Four observational studies and 1 pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference between the ProGlide® and MANTA® groups in the risk of all bleeding events, major/life-threatening bleeding, major vascular complications, minor vascular complications, pseudoaneurysms, and/or stenosis or dissection of the entry site vessel. However, the incidence of VCD failure was higher in the ProGlide® group compared with the MANTA® group (RR 1.94; 95% CI 1.31-2.84; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: In conclusion, both VCDs (ProGlide® and MANTA®) have comparable outcomes with regard to risk of bleeding, vascular complications, pseudoaneurysms, and/or stenosis or dissection of entry vessel. ProGlide® was however associated with higher device failure.