- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Abou-Al-Shaar, Hussam"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Frontotemporal-Orbitozygomatic Approach and Its Variants: Technical Nuances and Video Illustration(Wolters Kluwer, 2022-12) El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.; Nuñez, Maximiliano; Vigo, Vera; Abou-Al-Shaar, Hussam; Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C.; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A.; Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineThe frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic (FTOz) approach is an extension of the traditional pterional approach. It provides the neurosurgeon with a wide access to the skull base with minimal or no brain retraction needed; it also offers a panoramic view that enables various trajectories toward the anterior, middle, and central cranial fossae as well as the upper segment of the posterior cranial fossa. Intracranial lesions that can be addressed using the FTOz approach include large medial sphenoid wing and spheno-orbital meningiomas; suprasellar and parasellar tumors; lesions of the orbital apex, interpeduncular cistern, third ventricle, and upper paraclival regions; and anterior communicating artery and basilar-tip aneurysms. In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the FTOz approach and describe related technical nuances and common pitfalls. Our goal was to provide an up-to-date report of this time-tested surgical approach using original high-quality dissections, 3-dimensional models, and 2-dimensional 4K videos to serve as a reliable and practical educational resource for neurosurgery trainees and junior neurosurgeons. A case example is also provided to show the 1-piece orbitozygomatic approach.Item Orbital Exenteration for Craniofacial Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Characteristics and Survival Outcomes(MDPI, 2023-08-27) Qedair, Jumanah; Haider, Ali S.; Balasubramanian, Kishore; Palmisciano, Paolo; Hassan, Taimur; Shahbandi, Ataollah; Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi; Kharbat, Abdurrahman F.; Abou-Al-Shaar, Hussam; Yu, Kenny; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A.; El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.; Bin-Alamer, Othman; Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: The outcomes of orbital exenteration (OE) in patients with craniofacial lesions (CFLs) remain unclear. The present review summarizes the available literature on the clinical outcomes of OE, including surgical outcomes and overall survival (OS). Methods: Relevant articles were retrieved from Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane according to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes. Results: A total of 33 articles containing 957 patients who underwent OE for CFLs were included (weighted mean age: 64.3 years [95% CI: 59.9-68.7]; 58.3% were male). The most common lesion was squamous cell carcinoma (31.8%), and the most common symptom was disturbed vision/reduced visual acuity (22.5%). Of the patients, 302 (31.6%) had total OE, 248 (26.0%) had extended OE, and 87 (9.0%) had subtotal OE. Free flaps (33.3%), endosseous implants (22.8%), and split-thickness skin grafts (17.2%) were the most used reconstructive methods. Sino-orbital or sino-nasal fistula (22.6%), flap or graft failure (16.9%), and hyperostosis (13%) were the most reported complications. Regarding tumor recurrences, 38.6% were local, 32.3% were distant, and 6.7% were regional. The perineural invasion rate was 17.4%, while the lymphovascular invasion rate was 5.0%. Over a weighted mean follow-up period of 23.6 months (95% CI: 13.8-33.4), a weighted overall mortality rate of 39% (95% CI: 28-50%) was observed. The 5-year OS rate was 50% (median: 61 months [95% CI: 46-83]). The OS multivariable analysis did not show any significant findings. Conclusions: Although OE is a disfiguring procedure with devastating outcomes, it is a viable option for carefully selected patients with advanced CFLs. A patient-tailored approach based on tumor pathology, extension, and overall patient condition is warranted.