Browsing by Author "Abidov, Aiden"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical Characteristics and Transplant-Free Survival Across the Spectrum of Pulmonary Vascular Disease
    (Elsevier, 2022) Hemnes, Anna R.; Leopold, Jane A.; Radeva, Milena K.; Beck, Gerald J.; Abidov, Aiden; Aldred, Micheala A.; Barnard, John; Rosenzweig, Erika B.; Borlaug, Barry A.; Chung, Wendy K.; Comhair, Suzy A. A.; Desai, Ankit A.; Dubrock, Hilary M.; Erzurum, Serpil C.; Finet, J. Emanuel; Frantz, Robert P.; Garcia, Joe G. N.; Geraci, Mark W.; Gray, Michael P.; Grunig, Gabriele; Hassoun, Paul M.; Highland, Kristin B.; Hill, Nicholas S.; Hu, Bo; Kwon, Deborah H.; Jacob, Miriam S.; Jellis, Christine L.; Larive, A. Brett; Lempel, Jason K.; Maron, Bradley A.; Mathai, Stephen C.; McCarthy, Kevin; Mehra, Reena; Nawabit, Rawan; Newman, John H.; Olman, Mitchell A.; Park, Margaret M.; Ramos, Jose A.; Renapurkar, Rahul D.; Rischard, Franz P.; Sherer, Susan G.; Tang, W. H. Wilson; Thomas, James D.; Vanderpool, Rebecca R.; Waxman, Aaron B.; Wilcox, Jennifer D.; Yuan, Jason X-J; Horn, Evelyn M.; PVDOMICS Study Group; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: PVDOMICS (Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics) is a precision medicine initiative to characterize pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) using deep phenotyping. PVDOMICS tests the hypothesis that integration of clinical metrics with omic measures will enhance understanding of PVD and facilitate an updated PVD classification. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and transplant-free survival in the PVDOMICS cohort. Methods: Subjects with World Symposium Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) group 1-5 PH, disease comparators with similar underlying diseases and mild or no PH and healthy control subjects enrolled in a cross-sectional study. PH groups, comparators were compared using standard statistical tests including log-rank tests for comparing time to transplant or death. Results: A total of 1,193 subjects were included. Multiple WSPH groups were identified in 38.9% of PH subjects. Nocturnal desaturation was more frequently observed in groups 1, 3, and 4 PH vs comparators. A total of 50.2% of group 1 PH subjects had ground glass opacities on chest computed tomography. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was significantly lower in groups 1-3 PH than their respective comparators. Right atrial volume index was higher in WSPH groups 1-4 than comparators. A total of 110 participants had a mean pulmonary artery pressure of 21-24 mm Hg. Transplant-free survival was poorest in group 3 PH. Conclusions: PVDOMICS enrolled subjects across the spectrum of PVD, including mild and mixed etiology PH. Novel findings include low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide and enlarged right atrial volume index as shared features of groups 1-3 and 1-4 PH, respectively; unexpected, frequent presence of ground glass opacities on computed tomography; and sleep alterations in group 1 PH, and poorest survival in group 3 PH. PVDOMICS will facilitate a new understanding of PVD and refine the current PVD classification.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Point-of-care echocardiography of the right heart improves acute heart failure risk stratification for low-risk patients: The REED-AHF prospective study
    (Wiley, 2022) Harrison, Nicholas E.; Favot, Mark J.; Gowland, Laura; Lenning, Jacob; Henry, Sarah; Gupta, Sushane; Abidov, Aiden; Levy, Phillip; Ehrman, Robert; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Objectives: Validated acute heart failure (AHF) clinical decision instruments (CDI) insufficiently identify low-risk patients meriting consideration of outpatient treatment. While pilot data show that tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is associated with adverse events, no AHF CDI currently incorporates point-of-care echocardiography (POCecho). We evaluated whether TAPSE adds incremental risk stratification value to an existing CDI. Methods: Prospectively enrolled patients at two urban-academic EDs had POCechos obtained before or <1 h after first intravenous diuresis, positive pressure ventilation, and/or nitroglycerin. STEMI and cardiogenic shock were excluded. AHF diagnosis was adjudicated by double-blind expert review. TAPSE, with an a priori cutoff of ≥17 mm, was our primary measure. Secondary measures included eight additional right heart and six left heart POCecho parameters. STRATIFY is a validated CDI predicting 30-day death/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical cardiac support, intubation, new/emergent dialysis, and acute myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization in ED AHF patients. Full (STRATIFY + POCecho variable) and reduced (STRATIFY alone) logistic regression models were fit to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR), category-free net reclassification index (NRIcont ), ΔSensitivity (NRIevents ), and ΔSpecificity (NRInonevents ). Random forest assessed variable importance. To benchmark risk prediction to standard of care, ΔSensitivity and ΔSpecificity were evaluated at risk thresholds more conservative/lower than the actual outcome rate in discharged patients. Results: A total of 84/120 enrolled patients met inclusion and diagnostic adjudication criteria. Nineteen percent experiencing the primary outcome had higher STRATIFY scores compared to those event free (233 vs. 212, p = 0.009). Five right heart (TAPSE, TAPSE/PASP, TAPSE/RVDD, RV-FAC, fwRVLS) and no left heart measures improved prediction (p < 0.05) adjusted for STRATIFY. Right heart measures also had higher variable importance. TAPSE ≥ 17 mm plus STRATIFY improved prediction versus STRATIFY alone (aOR 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.91; NRIcont 0.71, 95% CI 0.22-1.19), and specificity improved by 6%-32% (p < 0.05) at risk thresholds more conservative than the standard-of-care benchmark without missing any additional events. Conclusions: TAPSE increased detection of low-risk AHF patients, after use of a validated CDI, at risk thresholds more conservative than standard of care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Significance of Historical Troponin Elevation in Acute Heart Failure: Not as Reassuring as Previously Assumed
    (Wiley, 2023) Harrison, Nicholas E.; Ehrman, Robert; Pang, Peter; Armitage, Sarah; Abidov, Aiden; Perkins, Daniel; Peacock, Johnathon; Montelauro, Nicholas; Gupta, Sushane; Favot, Mark J.; Levy, Phillip; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Historical cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation is commonly interpreted as lessening the significance of current cTn elevations at presentation for acute heart failure (AHF). Evidence for this practice is lacking. Our objective was to determine the incremental prognostic significance of historical cTn elevation compared to cTn elevation and ischemic heart disease (IHD) history at presentation for AHF. Methods: A total of 341 AHF patients were prospectively enrolled at five sites. The composite primary outcome was death/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical cardiac support, intubation, new/emergent dialysis, and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI)/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were 30-day AMI/PCI/CABG and in-hospital AMI. Logistic regression compared outcomes versus initial emergency department (ED) cTn, the most recent electronic medical record cTn, estimated glomerular filtration rate, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and IHD history (positive, negative by prior coronary workup, or unknown/no prior workup). Results: Elevated cTn occurred in 163 (49%) patients, 80 (23%) experienced the primary outcome, and 29 had AMI (9%). cTn elevation at ED presentation, adjusted for historical cTn and other covariates, was associated with the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-4.38), 30-day AMI/PCI/CABG, and in-hospital AMI. Historical cTn elevation was associated with greater odds of the primary outcome when IHD history was unknown at ED presentation (aOR 5.27, 95% CI 1.24-21.40) and did not alter odds of the outcome with known positive (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33-1.70) or negative IHD history (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.26-2.40). Nevertheless, patients with elevated ED cTn were more likely to be discharged if historical cTn was also elevated (78% vs. 32%, p = 0.025). Conclusions: Historical cTn elevation in AHF patients is a harbinger of worse outcomes for patients who have not had a prior IHD workup and should prompt evaluation for underlying ischemia rather than reassurance for discharge. With known IHD history, historical cTn elevation was neither reassuring nor detrimental, failing to add incremental prognostic value to current cTn elevation alone.