Social Work Research

Permanent URI for this community

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/4064

Browse

Browsing Social Work Research by Author "Adams, Erin L."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Consumer and Relationship Factors Associated with Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Consultations
    (2014-12) Matthias, Marianne S.; Fukui, Sadaaki; Kukla, Marina; Eliacin, Johanne; Bonfils, Kelsey A.; Firmin, Ruth; Oles, Sylwia; Adams, Erin L.; Collins, Linda A.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Department of Psychology, IU School of Science
    Objective: This study explored the association between shared decision making and consumers’ illness management skills and consumer-provider relationships. Methods: Medication management appointments for 79 consumers were audio recorded. Independent coders rated overall shared decision making, minimum level of shared decision making, and consumer-provider agreement for 63 clients whose visit included a treatment decision. Mental health diagnoses, medication adherence, patient activation, illness management, working alliance, and length of consumer-provider relationships were also assessed. Correlation analyses were used to determine relationships among measures. Results: Overall shared decision making was not associated with any variables. Minimum levels of shared decision making were associated with higher scores on the bond subscale of the Working Alliance Inventory, indicating a higher degree of liking and trust, and with better medication adherence. Agreement was associated with shorter consumer-provider relationships. Conclusions: Consumer-provider relationships and shared decision making might have a more nuanced association than originally thought.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correlates of observer-rated active involvement in psychiatric treatment visits
    (Elsevier, 2017-10) Bonfils, Kelsey A.; Luther, Lauren; Fukui, Sadaaki; Adams, Erin L.; Dreison, Kimberly C.; Firmin, Ruth L.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Department of Psychology, School of Science
    Among people with serious mental illness, increased patient activation has been linked to a range of key recovery outcomes. To date, patient activation has been measured largely through self-report. The present study investigated correlates of a new tool that assesses active involvement through rating audio-recordings of treatment visits. The key domains of patient activation assessed in visits included: patients asking questions, discussing with providers instances of being active in managing illness outside the session, talking about goals, bringing up concerns, making evaluative statements about treatment, setting the agenda for the visit, and making requests about the course of treatment. The new coding scheme proved to be a feasible and reliable method for identifying multi-faceted behavioral indicators of patient activation. Contrary to our hypotheses, in a sample of 166 people diagnosed with severe mental illnesses, self-reported activation and observer-rated indices of activation were often not correlated or correlated in unexpected directions with the new behavioral measure of patient activation. This suggests the nature of patient activation may be complex and work is needed to understand how observer-rated and self-rated activation may predict differential recovery outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Why are you here again? Concordance between consumers and providers about the primary concern in recurring psychiatric visits
    (Elsevier, 2014-12) Bonfils, Kelsey A.; Fukui, Sadaaki; Adams, Erin L.; Hedrick, Heidi M.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Department of Psychology, IU School of Science
    Patient-centered care has become increasingly important over the last decade, both in physical and mental health care. In support of patient-centered care, providers need to understand consumers׳ primary concerns during treatment visits. The current study explored what primary concerns were brought to recurring psychiatric visits for a sample of adults with severe mental illness (N=164), whether these concerns were concordant with those recognized by providers, and which factors predicted concordance. We identified 17 types of primary concerns, most commonly medications and symptoms, with only 50% of visits showing evidence of at least partial agreement between consumers and providers. Contrary to expectations, consumer demographics, activation, trust, and perceptions of patient-centeredness were not predictive, while greater preferences for autonomy predicted poorer agreement. Our findings highlight the need for interventions to promote a shared understanding of primary concerns in recurring psychiatric visits. Further attention is needed to ensure the provision of patient-centered care such that consumer concerns are acknowledged and addressed within recurring psychiatric visits.