Erector Spinae Plane Blocks vs No Blocks for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

dc.contributor.authorBlais, Austin
dc.contributor.authorYeap, Yar
dc.contributor.authorWarner, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T20:08:16Z
dc.date.available2024-01-05T20:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-17
dc.description.abstractBackground: Erector spinae plane blocks have recently gained traction in modern literature as a simple and effective alternative to Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) blocks for decreasing post-operative abdominal pain. Post-operative pain causes a significant burden to patients receiving laparoscopic hysterectomy, which can be ameliorated with effective anesthetic care promoting faster recovery. Objective: Our study aims to test the hypothesis that ESP block patients will have better pain scores and less opioid usage compared to patients who only receive IV pain meds. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on patients at University Hospital who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between May 2019-August 2021. 64 patients met criteria for inclusion. Those who received ESP block were compared with controls who received no block. Results: Our review found a significant reduction in both the patient reported max pain (4.0 vs 7.0, P=0.005) and average pain scores (2.2 vs 3.5, P=0.029) as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale. Conclusion: The erector spinae plane block shows potential for being an effective and simple alternative to TAP blocks or to IV opioids for the control of post-operative pain in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/37674
dc.titleErector Spinae Plane Blocks vs No Blocks for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
dc.typePoster
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Blais_poster.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: