Timing of Immunotherapy in Type 1 Diabetes: The Earlier, the Better?

Date
2021-07
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
AAI
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

In 1986, The New England Journal of Medicine published George Eisenbarth’s (Eisenbarth. 1986. N. Engl. J. Med. 314: 1360–1368) model of type 1 diabetes (T1D) as a chronic autoimmune disease. In 2019, the same journal published the results of the teplizumab trial, which showed the anti-CD3 mAb delayed T1D progression in high-risk individuals. Although teplizumab is the first immunomodulatory agent to demonstrate significant delay in disease progression, it is also one of the few tested prior to clinical disease onset. Is it possible, then, that this trial’s success is as much about the agent as it is about its timing? This commentary will review the landscape of immune intervention in T1D since 1986, discuss the teplizumab trial results, and finally, speculate on whether current paradigms for T1D immune intervention should focus less on disease development as a continuum and more on the stages of T1D progression as distinct disease processes.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Felton, J. L. (2021). Timing of Immunotherapy in Type 1 Diabetes: The Earlier, the Better? ImmunoHorizons, 5(7), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.4049/immunohorizons.2000105
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
ImmunoHorizons
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}