Novel Detection and Progression Markers for Diabetes Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Dynamics

Date
2024
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Oxford University Press
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Context: Static measures of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, such as time spent in specific glucose ranges (70-180 mg/dL or 70-140 mg/dL), do not fully capture the dynamic nature of blood glucose, particularly the subtle gradual deterioration of glycemic control over time in individuals with early-stage type 1 diabetes.

Objective: Develop a diabetes diagnostic tool based on 2 markers of CGM dynamics: CGM entropy rate (ER) and Poincaré plot (PP) ellipse area (S).

Methods: A total of 5754 daily CGM profiles from 843 individuals with type 1, type 2 diabetes, or healthy individuals with or without islet autoantibody status were used to compute 2 individual dynamic markers: ER (in bits per transition; BPT) of daily probability matrices describing CGM transitions between 8 glycemic states, and the area S (mg2/dL2) of individual CGM PP ellipses using standard PP descriptors. The Youden index was used to determine "optimal" cut-points for ER and S for health vs diabetes (case 1); type 1 vs type 2 (case 2); and low vs high type 1 immunological risk (case 3). The markers' discriminative power was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC).

Results: Optimal cutoff points were determined for ER and S for each of the 3 cases. ER and S discriminated case 1 with AUC = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) and AUC = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00), respectively (cutoffs ERcase1 = 0.76 BPT, Scase1 = 1993.91 mg2/dL2), case 2 with AUC = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84) and AUC = 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81), respectively (ERcase2 = 1.00 BPT, Scase2 = 5112.98 mg2/dL2), and case 3 with AUC = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58-0.86), and AUC = 0.66 (95% CI, 0.47-0.86), respectively (ERcase3 = 0.52 BPT, Scase3 = 923.65 mg2/dL2).

Conclusion: CGM dynamics markers can be an alternative to fasting plasma glucose or glucose tolerance testing to identify individuals at higher immunological risk of progressing to type 1 diabetes.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Montaser E, Farhy LS, Kovatchev BP. Novel Detection and Progression Markers for Diabetes Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Dynamics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;110(1):254-262. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae379
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}