Multi-center evaluation of analytical performance of the Beckman Coulter AU5822 chemistry analyzer

dc.contributor.authorZimmerman, Michelle K.
dc.contributor.authorFriesen, L. R.
dc.contributor.authorNice, A.
dc.contributor.authorVollmer, P. A.
dc.contributor.authorDockery, E. A.
dc.contributor.authorRankin, J. D.
dc.contributor.authorZmuda, K.
dc.contributor.authorWong, S. H.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-02T17:22:22Z
dc.date.available2016-08-02T17:22:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.description.abstractObjectives Our three academic institutions, Indiana University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and Wake Forest, were among the first in the United States to implement the Beckman Coulter AU5822 series chemistry analyzers. We undertook this post-hoc multi-center study by merging our data to determine performance characteristics and the impact of methodology changes on analyte measurement. Design and methods We independently completed performance validation studies including precision, linearity/analytical measurement range, method comparison, and reference range verification. Complete data sets were available from at least one institution for 66 analytes with the following groups: 51 from all three institutions, and 15 from 1 or 2 institutions for a total sample size of 12,064. Results Precision was similar among institutions. Coefficients of variation (CV) were < 10% for 97%. Analytes with CVs > 10% included direct bilirubin and digoxin. All analytes exhibited linearity over the analytical measurement range. Method comparison data showed slopes between 0.900-1.100 for 87.9% of the analytes. Slopes for amylase, tobramycin and urine amylase were < 0.8; the slope for lipase was > 1.5, due to known methodology or standardization differences. Consequently, reference ranges of amylase, urine amylase and lipase required only minor or no modification. Conclusion The four AU5822 analyzers independently evaluated at three sites showed consistent precision, linearity, and correlation results. Since installations, the test results had been well received by clinicians from all three institutions.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, M. K., Friesen, L. R., Nice, A., Vollmer, P. A., Dockery, E. A., Rankin, J. D., ... & Wong, S. H. (2015). Multi-center evaluation of analytical performance of the Beckman Coulter AU5822 chemistry analyzer. Clinical biochemistry, 48(13-14), 881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/10548
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.010en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Biochemistryen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectAU chemistry analyzeren_US
dc.subjectTDM and toxicology analyzersen_US
dc.subjectperformance evaluationen_US
dc.titleMulti-center evaluation of analytical performance of the Beckman Coulter AU5822 chemistry analyzeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zimmerman_2015_multi-center.pdf
Size:
348.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: