NCMP-03. Association of Progesterone Contraception with Tumor-Related Visual Impairment in Premenopausal Women with Meningioma Referred for Radiation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas express ER/PR, but hormonal risk is poorly characterized and not always considered. We hypothesized that hormonal contraceptives lead to tumor-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study with primary endpoint visual deficit prior to radiation for meningioma in women age ≤55. Key risk factors determined included age, grade, skull base location, hormonal supplementation / contraception, and neurofibromatosis / prior radiation (NF/priorRT). Univariate and multivariate (including factors with p<0.05 on univariate) logistic regression was performed to analyze associations with visual deficit. RESULTS: 64 women (median age 46) receiving RT from 2012-2024 at a single academic institution were included. 45 (70%) had skull base tumors, 33 (52%) used estrogen or progesterone, and 23 (36%) used unopposed progesterone only, 15 specifically medroxyprogesterone acetate (Provera). Visual deficit was present in 35 patients (55%) and was independently associated with both skull base location (p=0.002, OR 11.5) and unopposed progesterone only use (p=0.008, OR 12) but not estrogen or progesterone use on multivariate analysis. Proportion with progesterone only use was 57% vs. 11% in patients with vs. without visual deficit (chi-sq p<0.001). In 5 with ER/PR testing, 3 were PR+ (all with visual deficits and history of medroxyprogesterone acetate) and 2 were PR- (neither with visual deficits nor hormone use). 13 women (20%) were actively using progesterone during RT. 17 women have been contacted at time of analysis, and 4 discontinued progesterone. CONCLUSIONS: Progesterone increases risk for meningioma-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiotherapy, with a disproportionate number on Provera specifically. These data highlight the importance of age-appropriate counseling, consistent pathologic assessment of ER/PR status, and greater awareness of this issue amongst neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists.