Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites

Date
2025-09-17
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Springer
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Introduction: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath are potential biomarkers for medical conditions that may be used for non-invasive health monitoring. One challenge that still exists is determining the fidelity of reported VOC biomarkers. The lack of universally accepted sampling methods makes it difficult to identify reliable candidates, thus allowing for the potential of false discovery.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to robustly profile VOCs in breath samples collected from relatively healthy participants using two offline methods for collection/analysis via solid phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Methods: 158 cross-sectional volunteers provided one-time samples using two methods, one which directly sampled breath via SPME and another which collected breath in Tedlar bags. Using both methods, 10 volunteers provided an additional nine longitudinal samples. Ambient air samples were collected routinely, and a robust data processing schematic was used to ensure high quality reporting of on-breath VOCs.

Results: Data screening and processing led to the identification of > 30 unique VOCs in both methods. Hierarchical clustering and correlation analyses demonstrated volatile terpene/-oids showed homologous trends in both data sets. Of the 12 VOCs identified using both methods, 11 analytes displayed statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) in healthy breath samples. Finally, both methods were benchmarked regarding VOC reproducibility, and analyses showed that longitudinally collected samples were more reproducible compared to cross-sectional.

Conclusions: The quantitative results from both sampling methods mirrored each other, thus increasing the reliability and fidelity of VOCs reported along with the results from biostatistical analysis.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Schulz E, Maciel M, Wang Z, et al. Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites. Metabolomics. 2025;21(5):138. Published 2025 Sep 17. doi:10.1007/s11306-025-02340-1
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Metabolomics
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}