Browsing by Subject "urolithiasis"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Accuracy of Daily Fluid Intake Measurements Using a "Smart" Water Bottle(Springer, 2017) Borofsky, Michael S.; Dauw, Casey A.; York, Nadya; Terry, Colin; Lingeman, James E.; Urology, School of MedicineHigh fluid intake is an effective preventative strategy against recurrent kidney stones but is known to be challenging to achieve. Recently, a smart water bottle (Hidrate Spark™, Minneapolis, MN) was developed as a non-invasive fluid intake monitoring system. This device could help patients who form stones from low urine volume achieve sustainable improvements in hydration, but has yet to be validated in a clinical setting. Hidrate Spark™ uses capacitive touch sensing via an internal sensor. It calculates volume measurements by detecting changes in water level and sends data wirelessly to users’ smartphones through an application. A pilot study was conducted to assess accuracy of measured fluid intake over 24 h periods when used in a real life setting. Subjects were provided smart bottles and given short tutorials on their use. Accuracy was determined by comparing 24-h fluid intake measurements calculated through the smart bottle via sensor to standard volume measurements calculated by the patient from hand over the same 24 h period. Eight subjects performed sixty-two 24-h measurements (range 4–14). Mean hand measurement was 57.2 oz/1692 mL (21–96 oz/621–2839 mL). Corresponding mean smart bottle measurement underestimated true fluid intake by 0.5 ozs. (95% CI −1.9, 0.9). Percent difference between hand and smart bottle measurements was 0.0% (95% CI − 3%, 3%). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), calculated to assess consistency between hand measures and bottle measures, was 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) indicating an extremely high consistency between measures. 24-h fluid intake measurements from a novel fluid monitoring system (Hidrate Spark™) are accurate to within 3%. Such technology may be useful as a behavioral aide and/or research tool particularly among recurrent stone formers with low urinary volume.Item Calcium Tartrate Tetrahydrate, Case Report of a Novel Human Kidney Stone(Mary Ann Liebert, 2017-12-01) Kleinguetl, Colin; Williams, James C.; Ibrahim, Samar A.; Daudon, Michel; Bird, Erin T.; El Tayeb, Marawan M.; Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of MedicineBackground: Calcium tartrate tetrahydrate has been reported as the main mineral in urinary stones in rats that have significant tartrate in their diet, but in humans, there has been only one mention of calcium tartrate stones in the form of bladder stone, and that case was in Africa., Case Presentation: Patient is a 34-year-old Caucasian male who presented with typical symptoms of nephrolithiasis. CT abd/pelvis (renal stone protocol) revealed a 2 cm nonobstructing stone of the right renal pelvis. Patient underwent an uncomplicated right percutaneous nephrolithotomy and was noted to be stone free after surgery. Stone analysis was difficult with regard to determining composition, but was finally identified as calcium tartrate tetrahydrate., Conclusion: This was an unusual case, as this is the first recorded case of a calcium tartrate tetrahydrate outside of Africa. This type of stone had only been mainly described in rat models with dl-bitartrate in their diet. Our patient was an otherwise healthy, relatively muscular individual with no obvious source for this stone other than a vitamin and amino acid supplement that he takes regularly that contains l-carnitine (as tartrate) and choline (as bitartrate and citrate). The prevalence of this stone type is presently unknown, as stone analysis laboratories have not had the ability to recognize it. Although a connection between the supplement and stone formation is conjecture at this time, we believe this necessitates further investigation.Item Cost-effectiveness analysis of the management of distal ureteral stones in children(Elsevier, 2019) Chan, Katherine H.; Whittam, Benjamin M.; Krambeck, Amy; Downs, Stephen M.; Misseri, Rosalia; Cain, Mark P.; Bennett, William E., Jr.; Urology, School of MedicineObjective To determine the most cost-effective approach to the management of distal ureteral stones in children given the potential for recurrent renal colic during a trial of passage versus potential stent discomfort and complications of ureteroscopy. Methods We developed a decision tree to project costs and clinical outcomes associated with observation, medical explusive therapy (MET), and ureteroscopy for the management of an index patient with a 4mm distal ureteral stone. We determined which strategy would be least costly and offer the most pain-free days within 30 days of diagnosis. We performed a one-way sensitivity analysis on the probability of successful stone passage with MET. We obtained probabilities from the literature and costs from the 2016 Pediatric Health Information System Database. Results Ureteroscopywas the costliest strategy but maximized the number of pain-free days within 30 days of diagnosis ($5,282/29 pain-free days). MET was less costly than ureteroscopybut also less effective ($615/21.8 pain-free days). Observation cost more than MET and was also less effective ($2,139/15.5 pain-free days). The one-way sensitivity analysis on the probability of successful stone passage with MET demonstrated that ureteroscopyalways has the highest net monetary benefits value and is therefore the recommended strategy given a fixed WTP. Discussion Using a rigorous decision-science approach, we found that ureteroscopy is the recommended strategy in children with small distal ureteral stones. Although it cost more than MET, it resulted in more pain-free days in the first 30 days following diagnosis given the faster resolution of the stone episode.Item Initial collection of an inadequate 24-hour urine sample in children does not predict subsequent inadequate collections(Elsevier, 2018) Chan, Katherine H.; Moser, Elizabeth A.; Whittam, Benjamin M.; Misseri, Rosalia; Cain, Mark P.; Krambeck, Amy; Schwaderer, Andrew; Urology, School of MedicineIntroduction Approximately half of adult stone formers submit specimens that are either under or over collections as determined by 24-h creatinine/kg. Previously identified predictors of inadequate collection in adults include female sex, older age, higher body mass index (BMI), vitamin D supplementation, and weekday collection. Objective The objective of this study is to determine risk factors for inadequate 24-h urinary specimen collection in the pediatric population. Study design A retrospective analysis of all children (<18 years of age) with renal and/or ureteral calculi evaluated at the study tertiary care pediatric center from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Those who had at least one 24-h urinary metabolic profile after a clinical visit for kidney and/or ureteral stones were included; children with bladder stones were excluded. Adequate collections had a urine creatinine of 10–15 mg/kg/24 h. A bivariate analysis of potential factors associated with inadequate collection of the initial urinary metabolic profile, including child demographics, parental socio-economic factors, history of stone surgery, and weekday vs. weekend urine collection, was performed. A mixed-effects logistic regression, controlling for correlation of specimens from the same patient, was also performed to determine whether an initial inadequate collection predicted a subsequent inadequate collection. Results Of 367 patients, 80 had an adequate collection (21.9%): median age, 13 years (interquartile range, 8–16); 61.1% female; 93.5% white; 19.5% obese; and 13.0% overweight. No parental or child factors were associated with inadequate collection (Summary Table). Of inadequate collections, more than 80% were over collections. In the 175 patients with more than one 24-h urinary specimen collection, the effect of an initial inadequate collection on subsequent inadequate collections was not significant after controlling for the correlation of samples from the same patient (p = 0.8). Discussion Any parental or child factors associated with the collection of inadequate 24-h urine specimens in children were not found. An initial inadequate collection does not predict subsequent inadequate collections. It was surprising that >80% of the inadequate collections were over collections rather than under collections. Possible explanations are that children collected urine samples for longer than the 24-h period or that stone-forming children produce more creatinine per 24-h period than healthy children due to hyperfiltration. Conclusion Inadequate collections are very common, and the risk factors for them are unclear. A repeat collection would be suggested if the first is inadequate. Further studies must be planned to explore barriers to accurate specimen collection using qualitative research methodology.Item Management of Kidney Stones in Pregnancy: A Worldwide Survey of Practice Patterns(Liebert, 2024-10) Juliebø-Jones, Patrick; Semins, Michelle J.; Seitz, Christian; Krambeck, Amy; Keller, Etienne Xavier; Davis, Niall F.; Tselves, Lazaros; Geraghty, Robert; Beisland, Christian; Ulvik, Øyvind; Sørstrand Æsøy, Mathias; Bres-Niewada, Ewa; Hameed, B. M. Zeeshan; Gauhar, Vineet; Contreras, Pablos; Skolarikos, Andreas; Somani, Bhaskar K.; Urology, School of MedicineIntroduction: Kidney stones in pregnant is not a common emergency, but it is one that is extremely challenging to manage. There exists no previous survey, which maps the different practice patterns adopted. Our aim was to deliver a survey to evaluate the current status of practice patterns across different parts of the world regarding the management of stone disease in pregnancy. Methods: Through an iterative process, 19-item survey was devised. This contained the following five sections: (1) Demographics, (2) General items, (3) Diagnosis and Imaging, (4) Initial management, (5) Surgery. It was disseminated via social media and email chains. Results: A total of 355 responses were collected, and the majority (66.2%) reported no established hospital protocol for stones in pregnancy. Ultrasound was the most popular first line imaging choice (89.9%) but 8% would choose non-contrast CT. The latter was also chosen as second line choicer in 34.6% as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging. A large proportion (42.5%) had requested CT in pregnancy previously. With equivocal ultra sound results, only 19.4% would proceed to ureteroscopy (URS) but 40.9% would opt for CT. Twenty-four–48 hours were the most popular (37.6%) time period to observe before surgical intervention. Ureteral stent and nephrostomy were regarded as equally effective, and 6 weeks was most popular frequency for an exchange. Most do not use fetal heart rate monitoring intraoperatively. A total of 3.94% had previously performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy during pregnancy. Conclusion: Practice patterns vary widely for suspected kidney stones in pregnancy and use of CT appears increasingly popular. This includes when faced with equivocal ultrasound results and instead of proceeding to ureteroscopy. Most hospitals lack an established management protocol for this scenario.Item Uncovering a Novel Stone in 27 Patients: Calcium Tartrate Tetrahydrate(Elsevier, 2019) Kleinguetl, Colin; Williams, James C., Jr.; Lieske, John; Daudon, Michel; Rivera, Marcelino; Janneto, Paul; Bornhorst, Joshua; Rokke, Denise; Bird, Erin T.; Lingeman, James E.; El Tayeb, Marawan M.; Anatomy and Cell Biology, IU School of MedicineObjective To further analyze calcium tartrate tetrahydrate stones after a recent case report described this novel stone. Prior to this, there was only one previously reported occurrence of this stone in a human. This unusual stone composition is not tested for routinely. True prevalence and possible causes of this stone are unknown. Materials/Methods During the previous case report, micro-CT and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy were used to identify a calcium tartrate tetrahydrate stone. This information was applied to urinary stones with previously unidentified compositions in the Mayo Metals laboratory database between 2010 and March 2018. Two additional stones were identified at our institution. Three patients had medical records available for analysis. Results Between 2010 and March 2018, 35 calcium tartrate stones in 25 patients were identified in the Mayo database as well as 2 at our institution (37 stones in 27 patients). Thirty stones were pure calcium tartrate with the remainder having elements of more common stones. The average age was 46.3 (±14.7) with a slightly higher incidence in females (17 vs 10). Of the 3 medical records investigated, all 3 were males (average age 48.7), and each reported consumption of an energy supplement (Spark) routinely. Conclusion The true prevalence of this relatively unknown stone remains unclear and additional investigation is warranted. We believe all stone laboratories should have access to the IR spectra for calcium tartrate tetrahydrate. Attention should be paid to possible causes of this stone, particularly with relation to oral supplements, to aid with future prevention and treatment.