Browsing by Subject "genetic variants"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analytical Validation of Variants to Aid in Genotype-Guided Therapy for Oncology
    (Elsevier, 2019) Swart, Marelize; Stansberry, Wesley M.; Pratt, Victoria M.; Medeiros, Elizabeth B.; Kiel, Patrick J.; Shen, Fei; Schneider, Bryan P.; Skaar, Todd C.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 requires that pharmacogenetic genotyping methods need to be established according to technical standards and laboratory practice guidelines before testing can be offered to patients. Testing methods for variants in ABCB1, CBR3, COMT, CYP3A7, C8ORF34, FCGR2A, FCGR3A, HAS3, NT5C2, NUDT15, SBF2, SEMA3C, SLC16A5, SLC28A3, SOD2, TLR4, and TPMT were validated in a CLIA-accredited laboratory. As no known reference materials were available, DNA samples that were from Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ) were used for the analytical validation studies. Pharmacogenetic testing methods developed here were shown to be accurate and 100% analytically sensitive and specific. Other CLIA-accredited laboratories interested in offering pharmacogenetic testing for these genetic variants, related to genotype-guided therapy for oncology, could use these publicly available samples as reference materials when developing and validating new genetic tests or refining current assays.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Editorial: Deciphering Non-Coding Regulatory Variants: Computational and Functional Validation
    (Frontiers, 2021-11) Chen, Li; Li, Mulin Jun; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Identifying Genetic Variants in Adolescents With Oppositional Defiant Disorders and/or Conduct Disorders: A Brief Report
    (Wiley, 2016-08) Oruche, Ukamaka M.; Ross, Sydney E.; Carpenter, Janet S.; Renbarger, Jamie; Department of Nursing, School of Nursing
    PROBLEM To add to diversity in our state biobank, we explored the feasibility of collecting genetic material from adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and/or conduct disorder (CD) and their family members. We also preliminarily explored genetic factors associated with ODD and/or CD by comparing participant data to 1000 Genome Project data on minor allele frequencies. METHODS Adolescents with ODD and/or CD and family members provided saliva samples for genetic testing. We evaluated five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively, in the dopamine receptor subtype D2, dopamine receptor subtype D3, dopamine beta-hydroxylase, dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3, and alpha-2-adrenergic receptor genes. Fisher's exact tests were used to examine differences in minor allele frequencies for each SNP. FINDINGS Thirty-one viable samples were genotyped from 15 affected adolescents and 16 unaffected family members; the 60% consent rate reflected high feasibility. Compared with the 1000 Genome Project frequencies, affected adolescents had higher frequencies of the genetic variant in the dopamine receptor subtype D2 (p = .05) and dopamine beta-hydroxylase (p = 0.03), but not of the other three SNPs examined. CONCLUSIONS Collecting genetic materials from an ethnically diverse sample of affected adolescents and their families is feasible. We offer practical suggestions to strengthen the integrity of future research studies.