Browsing by Subject "gender differences"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Daily diary study of adult men’s and women’s event-level sexual motivations and sexual behaviour
    (Csiro, 2017) Hensel, Devon J.; He, Fei; Harezlak, Jarek; Fortenberry, J. Dennis; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Understanding people’s sexual motivations has long been of public health and health promotion interest. We used daily diaries to examine how adult men’s and women’s event-specific affective sexual motivations were linked to the types and combinations of sexual behaviours chosen in a given sexual event. Methods: Adult men (n = 156) and women (n = 192) completed thrice-daily electronic diaries assessing individual- and partner-specific attributes and non-coital or coital sexual behaviours. Sexual motivations were: interest in sex, feeling in love with partner, wanted to have sex and partner wanted to have sex. The outcome variable was: sexual behaviour type (no sex, one vaginal sex event, one vaginal sex event + any other sex types, multiple vaginal sex events, any other sex types). Mixed-effect multinomial logistic regression modelled the influence of each sexual motivation on sexual behaviour type (Stata; all p < 0.05). ‘No sex’ was the referent in all models; all models controlled for gender. Results: Participants contributed 14 856 total partner-associated diary entries. Most (54%; women: 56.5%, men: 51.2%) were associated with no sex; when sex occurred, the most common behaviour type was one vaginal sex event (13.1%) for women and other sex types (16.4%) for men. Wanting to have sex or perceiving a partner wanted to have sex were the strongest predictors of sexual behaviour type, and were associated with a greater number of reported sexual behaviours. Conclusions: Event-specific sexual motivations are associated with the choice to have sex, and with variation in the chosen sexual behaviours.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Exploring Gender Differences in Colon Cancer Screening Knowledge and Health Beliefs among African Americans
    (Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2013-04-05) Olofinkua, Oluwakemi Blessing; Rawl, Susan M.
    African Americans are diagnosed with and die at higher rates from colorectal cancer (CRC) than any ethnic groups in the United States. Culturally appropriate, effective interventions are urgently needed to reduce these cancer disparities by increasing participation in CRC screening. Both men and women are at risk for CRC, but may have different perceptions of their personal risk for CRC, knowledge, and health beliefs about screening. The purpose of the study was to examine gender differences among 817 African American primary care patients who are overdue for CRC screening. A framework based on the Health Belief Model and the Transtheoretical Model was developed specifically for this study. Baseline data were analyzed from a randomized clinical trial comparing two interventions to promote screening. African American primary care patients (n=817) who were due for screening were recruited from 11 clinics. Telephone interviewers collected baseline data on demographic characteristics, CRC knowledge, CRC health beliefs (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy). Comparisons between male and female participants were conducted using t-tests and chi-square. Significant differences were found between men and women on several health beliefs about CRC screening. Compared to women, men had higher perceived CRC risk scores (p=.001), higher colonoscopy benefits scores (p=.012), higher colonoscopy self-efficacy scores (p= .005), and higher FOBT self-efficacy scores (p=.000). Women had significantly higher colonoscopy barriers scores (p=.005) than men. No differences were observed between men and women on CRC knowledge scores (p=.829), FOBT benefits scores (p=.783), and FOBT barriers scores (p=.679). Results indicate there are differences between African American men and women in relation to specific CRC screening health beliefs. Knowledge of CRC screening is equally low for both groups. Health care providers should take note of this when providing recommendations for screening. In addition, these results can inform the development of effective strategies for tailoring interventions to increase CRC screening.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Gender Differences in Demographic and Clinical Correlates among Veterans with Musculoskeletal Disorders
    (Elsevier, 2017-07) Higgins, Diana M.; Fenton, Brenda T.; Driscoll, Mary A.; Heapy, Alicia A.; Kerns, Robert D.; Bair, Matthew J.; Carroll, Constance; Brennan, Penny L.; Burgess, Diana J.; Piette, John D.; Haskell, Sally G.; Brandt, Cynthia A.; Goulet, Joseph L.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Studies suggest that women may be at greater risk for developing chronic pain and pain-related disability. Methods Because musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are the most frequently endorsed painful conditions among veterans, we sought to characterize gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical correlates among veterans upon entry into Veterans Health Administration's Musculoskeletal Disorders Cohort (n = 4,128,008). Results Women were more likely to be younger, Black, unmarried, and veterans of recent conflicts. In analyses adjusted for gender differences in sociodemographics, women were more likely to have diagnoses of fibromyalgia, temporomandibular disorders, and neck pain. Almost one in five women (19.4%) had more than one MSD diagnosis, compared with 15.7% of men; this higher risk of MSD multimorbidity remained in adjusted analyses. Adjusting for sociodemographics, women with MSD were more likely to have migraine headache and depressive, anxiety, and bipolar disorders. Women had lower odds of cardiovascular diseases, substance use disorders, and several MSDs, including back pain conditions. Men were more likely to report “no pain” on the pain intensity Numeric Rating Scale, whereas more women (41%) than men (34%) reported moderate to severe pain (Numeric Rating Scale 4+). Conclusions Because women veterans are more likely to have conditions such as fibromyalgia and mental health conditions, along with greater pain intensity in the setting of MSD, women-specific pain services may be needed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Men Don't Care While Women Find it Unfair: Exploring the Harmful Consequences of Illegal Interview Questions on Women's Reactions
    (2020-02) Beecham, Jasmine; Pietri, Evava S.; Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie; Lindsey, Alex P.; Stockdale, Margaret S.
    Although interviews are a widely used and popular selection technique, when they lack clear structure and a predetermined set of questions, bias can permeate the interview selection process. In particular, illegal interview questions (i.e., questions that cannot legally be asked, such as marital status or children) may be particularly threatening for female applicants. Justice and social identity theory were used to explain the applicant reactions to illegal interview questions in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four hypothetical interview conditions – a control of four low face-valid interview questions, four non-gender relevant illegal interview questions, or four gender-relevant illegal interview questions. There was a significant gender by condition interaction on all outcome measures. Illegal interview questions had a significant negative effect on women’s organizational reactions (job pursuit intentions, organizational attractiveness, belonging, trust & comfort) but not on men’s organizational reactions. In contrast both women and men had significantly lower procedural justice perceptions of the gender-relevant illegal interview condition compared to the two other conditions. However, women perceived the illegal interview questions (both the gender relevant and gender non-relevant questions) as lower in face validity (i.e., were less relevant to the job), whereas men perceived all the interview questions as equally face-valid. Thus, although men believed the illegal interview questions were low in procedural justice and unfair, men still perceived these questions as valid and job-relevant. Overall, an indirect effect of procedural justice perceptions on organizational reactions was significant for both men and women, indicating that lower procedural justice did have a significant negative effect on applicants’ organizational reactions. Taken together, the following study demonstrates that illegal interview questions (both those related to gender and unrelated to gender) act as a social identity threat for women and harm women’s attraction to the organization, whereas men are primarily unaffected by these illegal interview questions in their reactions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    When “Good People” Sexually Harass: The Role of Power and Moral Licensing on Sexual Harassment Perceptions and Intentions
    (Springer, 2022-06-01) Dinh, Tuyen K.; Mikalouski, Laurel; Stockdale, Margaret S.
    History has shown that people who embody responsibility-focused power have been credibly accused of sexual harassment. Drawing from power-approach and moral licensing theories, we present two complementary studies examining how responsibility-focused power triggers moral licensing, which, in turn, decreases perceptions of sexual harassment (Study 1) and increases intentions to engage in sexual harassment (Study 2). In Study 1, 365 participants read a scenario of a man embodying responsibility-focused power, self-focused power, or low power (control) and then read a case about the man’s alleged sexual harassment against a subordinate. Findings illustrated that moral crediting mediated the effect of power construal on false accusation judgments. In Study 2, 250 participants were primed to experience responsibility-focused power or low power. Responsibility-focused power increased sexual harassment intentions through effects on communal feelings and moral crediting. Based on these findings, we develop a new theoretical perspective on why sexual harassment occurs and why people deny perceiving it. We provide practical recommendations to organizational leaders for developing interventions, such as training, that may disrupt effects of power and moral licensing on sexual harassment intentions, and we encourage public discourse on the harms of harassment that supposed “good people” commit.