Browsing by Subject "Structural racism"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Allies Welcomed to Advance Racial Equity (AWARE) Faculty Seminar Series: Program Design and Implementation
    (Sage, 2021) Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Neal, Chemen; Shanks, Anthony L.; Scott, Nicole; Robertson, Sharon; Rouse, Caroline E.; Bernard, Caitlin; Sotto-Santiago, Sylk
    Introduction: In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, White faculty in our department began to express the desire to gain a greater understanding of structural racism and racial inequity. To facilitate this learning, support allyship, and mitigate the emotional labor and taxation that frequently falls on faculty of color to respond to these appeals, we developed AWARE (Allies Welcomed to Advance Racial Equity), a faculty seminar series primarily designed for and led by a majority White faculty to tackle the topics of structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racist action. Methods: We developed a 6-session seminar series, identifying 5 White faculty as lecturers and a cadre of Black and White volunteer facilitators, to lead 60-minute sessions comprised of lecture, facilitated small group reflection, and large group sharing, that reviewed key topics/texts on structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racism. Results: Attendance ranged from 26 to 37 participants at each session. About 80% of faculty participated in at least 1 session of the program. The majority of participants (85%) felt “more empowered to influence their current environment to be more inclusive of others” and were “better equipped to advocate for themselves or others.” Most (81%) felt “more connected to their colleagues following completion of the program.” Ultimately, faculty thought highly of the program upon completion with 26/27 (96%) stating they would recommend the program to a colleague. Discussion: We offer a reproducible model to improve departmental climate by engaging in the shared labor of educating our colleagues and communities about structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racism to create a point of entry into reflection, dialogue, and deliberate actions for change.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Allies Welcomed to Advance Racial Equity (AWARE) Faculty Seminar Series: Program Design and Implementation
    (Sage, 2021-07-24) Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Neal, Chemen; Shanks, Anthony L.; Scott, Nicole; Robertson, Sharon; Rouse, Caroline E.; Bernard, Caitlin; Sotto-Santiago, Sylk; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: In the wake of George Floyd's murder, White faculty in our department began to express the desire to gain a greater understanding of structural racism and racial inequity. To facilitate this learning, support allyship, and mitigate the emotional labor and taxation that frequently falls on faculty of color to respond to these appeals, we developed AWARE (Allies Welcomed to Advance Racial Equity), a faculty seminar series primarily designed for and led by a majority White faculty to tackle the topics of structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racist action. Methods: We developed a 6-session seminar series, identifying 5 White faculty as lecturers and a cadre of Black and White volunteer facilitators, to lead 60-minute sessions comprised of lecture, facilitated small group reflection, and large group sharing, that reviewed key topics/texts on structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racism. Results: Attendance ranged from 26 to 37 participants at each session. About 80% of faculty participated in at least 1 session of the program. The majority of participants (85%) felt "more empowered to influence their current environment to be more inclusive of others" and were "better equipped to advocate for themselves or others." Most (81%) felt "more connected to their colleagues following completion of the program." Ultimately, faculty thought highly of the program upon completion with 26/27 (96%) stating they would recommend the program to a colleague. Discussion: We offer a reproducible model to improve departmental climate by engaging in the shared labor of educating our colleagues and communities about structural racism, Whiteness, and Anti-racism to create a point of entry into reflection, dialogue, and deliberate actions for change.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association between clinician team segregation, receipt of cardiovascular care and outcomes in valvular heart diseases
    (Wiley, 2025) Bolakale-Rufai, Ikeoluwapo Kendra; Knapp, Shannon M.; Bisono, Janina Quintero; Johnson, Adedoyin; Moore, Wanda; Yankah, Ekow; Yee, Ryan; Trabue, Dalancee; Nallamothu, Brahmajee; Hollingsworth, John M.; Watty, Stephen; Williamson, Francesca; Pool, Natalie; Hebdon, Megan; Ezema, Nneamaka; Capers, Quinn; Blount, Courtland; Kimbrough, Nia; Johnson, Denee; Evans, Jalynn; Foree, Brandi; Holman, Anastacia; Lightbourne, Karen; Brown, David; Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Breathett, Khadijah; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aims: Racial disparities exist in clinical outcomes for valvular heart disease (VHD). It is unknown whether clinician segregation contributes to these disparities. Among an adequately insured population, we evaluated the relationship between clinician segregation in a hospital and receipt of care by a cardiologist according to patient race. We also evaluated the association between clinician segregation, race and care by a cardiologist on 30-day readmission and 1-year survival. Methods and results: Using Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM, US commercial and Medicare beneficiaries) from 2010 to 2018, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of VHD. Hospitals were categorized into low, medium and high segregation groups (SG), according to clinician segregation index (SI). SI can range from 0-1 (0: the ratio of Black to White patients is the same for all clinicians; 1: each clinician treats only Black or only White patients). Outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed effect models. Among 8649 patients [median age 75 (67-82), 45.4% female, 16.1% Black, 83.9% White], odds of care from a cardiologist did not vary across race for all SGs [Low SG adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58-1.08), P = 0.14; Medium SG aOR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.60-1.25), P = 0.43; High SG aOR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.69), P = 0.76]. Among those that received care from a cardiologist, there was no difference in the 30-day readmission between Black and White patients across SGs [Low SG aOR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83-1.31), P = 0.70; Medium SG aOR: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.92-1.61), P = 0.17; High SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.57-1.17), P = 0.27]. Among patients that did not receive care from a cardiologist, Black patients in low SG had higher odds of 30-day readmission compared to White patients [aOR: 2.74 (95%CI:1.38-5.43), P < 0.01]. Odds of 1-year survival were similar across race for all SG irrespective of receipt of care from a cardiologist [seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 1.13 (95% CI: 0.86-1.48), P = 0.38; Medium SG aOR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59-1.17), P = 0.29; High SG aOR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.66-1.52), P = 0.98; not seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.23-1.34), P = 0.19; Medium SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.28-2.37), P = 0.70; High SG aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.23-1.74), P = 0.37]. Conclusions: Among an insured population, race was not associated with care by a cardiologist for VHD or survival. Black patients not seen by cardiologists had higher odds of 30-day readmission in low clinician SG.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correction: Taking action to advance the study of race and ethnicity: the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI)
    (Springer Nature, 2022-11-25) Garcia, Lorena; Follis, Shawna; Thomson, Cynthia A.; Breathett, Khadijah; Wiley Cené, Crystal; Jimenez, Monik; Kooperberg, Charles; Masaki, Kamal; Paskett, Electra D.; Pettinger, Mary; Aragaki, Aaron; Dilworth‑Anderson, Peggye; Stefanick, Marcia L.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Correction: Women’s Midlife Health 8, 1 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40695-021-00071-6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Taking action to advance the study of race and ethnicity: the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI)
    (Springer Nature, 2022) Garcia, Lorena; Follis, Shawna; Thomson, Cynthia A.; Breathett, Khadijah; Wiley Cené, Crystal; Jimenez, Monik; Kooperberg, Charles; Masaki, Kamal; Paskett, Electra D.; Pettinger, Mary; Aragaki, Aaron; Dilworth‑Anderson, Peggye; Stefanick, Marcia L.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    “Race” and “ethnicity” are socially constructed terms, not based on biology - in contrast to biologic ancestry and genetic admixture - and are flexible, contested, and unstable concepts, often driven by power. Although individuals may self-identify with a given race and ethnic group, as multidimensional beings exposed to differential life influencing factors that contribute to disease risk, additional social determinants of health (SDOH) should be explored to understand the relationship of race or ethnicity to health. Potential health effects of structural racism, defined as “the structures, policies, practices, and norms resulting in differential access to goods, services, and opportunities of society by “race,” have been largely ignored in medical research. The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) was expected to enroll a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of older women at 40 U.S. clinical centers between 1993 and 1998; yet, key information on the racial and ethnic make-up of the WHI cohort of 161,808 women was limited until a 2020–2021 Task Force was charged by the WHI Steering Committee to better characterize the WHI cohort and develop recommendations for WHI investigators who want to include “race” and/or “ethnicity” in papers and presentations. As the lessons learned are of relevance to most cohorts, the essence of the WHI Race and Ethnicity Language and Data Interpretation Guide is presented in this paper. Recommendations from the WHI Race and Ethnicity Language and Data Interpretation Guide include: Studies should be designed to include all populations and researchers should actively, purposefully and with cultural-relevance, commit to recruiting a diverse sample; Researchers should collect robust data on race, ethnicity and SDOH variables that may intersect with participant identities, such as immigration status, country of origin, acculturation, current residence and neighborhood, religion; Authors should use appropriate terminology, based on a participant’s self-identified “race” and “ethnicity”, and provide clear rationale, including a conceptual framework, for including race and ethnicity in the analytic plan; Researchers should employ appropriate analytical methods, including mixed-methods, to study the relationship of these sociocultural variables to health; Authors should address how representative study participants are of the population to which results might apply, such as by age, race and ethnicity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Delivering Antiracist Care to Black Americans
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2022) Jones, Katie Fitzgerald; Laury, Esther; Sanders, Justin J.; Starr, Lauren T.; Rosa, William E.; Booker, Staja Q.; Wachterman, Melissa; Jones, Christopher A.; Hickman, Susan; Merlin, Jessica S.; Meghani, Salimah H.; School of Nursing
    Racial disparities, including decreased hospice utilization, lower quality symptom management, and poor-quality end-of-life care have been well documented in Black Americans. Improving health equity and access to high-quality serious illness care is a national palliative care (PC) priority. Accomplishing these goals requires clinician reflection, engagement, and large-scale change in clinical practice and health-related policies. In this article, we provide an overview of key concepts that underpin racism in health care, discuss common serious illness disparities in Black Americans, and propose steps to promote the delivery of antiracist PC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    U.S. Heart Transplantation Allocation: Injustice in Complacency
    (Elsevier, 2023) Breathett, Khadijah; Medicine, School of Medicine