- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Social networking"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Connecting students' homework to their participation in a course-based social network(2017) Gavrin, A.; Lindell, R.S.; Physics, School of ScienceThis paper presents a comparison between students' efforts on homework (problem sets delivered and completed online using WebAssign) and their participation on a course-focused social media site. The social media platform, CourseNetworking (CN), has many features typical of Learning Management Systems (LMSs), but is distinct in several important ways. The interface is far more "student centric" than traditional LMSs, and is designed to increase engagement; most of the CN window is devoted to student-authored content. Also, the site measures and "gamifies" participation, using an algorithm that includes posts, completion of surveys, comments on other students' posts, and other actions. The setting for our efforts was an introductory calculus-based mechanics class enrolling approximately 150 students, most of whom were engineering majors. Course exams, problem sets, and labs followed a traditional model. Social media participation was not required, but it was encouraged and students could earn a small extra-credit bonus. We investigated correlations between social media "micropoints" and three variables associated with the homework: time on task, points earned, and assignments skipped. Our results show small to moderate correlations and statistical significance in all three cases. Pearson's correlation coefficients are r = 0.286, 0.444, and -0.436 for time on task, points earned, and assignments skipped, respectively. The associated p values are 1.2 × 10-3 for time on task, and p < 10-5 for the other two variables. Because the variables we measure are not normally distributed, we verify these results by also calculating Kendall's tau statistic. This analysis confirms both the size and significance of the correlations we observe. We do not suggest a causal connection; rather, our conclusion is that participation in the social network is a form of engagement with the class comparable to traditional measures of engagement such as homework effort and outcome. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.Item Kidney Nutrition in the Era of Social Media: Bridging the Gap of Nutrition Education and Kidney Health Literacy by Leveraging Resources of Social Networking(Elsevier, 2022) Biruete, Annabel; Kistler, Brandon M.; Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar; Moore, Linda W.; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Promoting a more diverse and inclusive research workforce through the research scholars program(Springer Nature, 2024-01-30) Schoenberg, Nancy E.; Robinson, Jimmy; McGladrey, Margaret; Cassis, Lisa A.; Conwell, Darwin; Pearson, Kevin J.; Tannock, Lisa R.; Wilcock, Donna; White, Stephanie; Neurology, School of MedicineBackground: Novel and comprehensive approaches are needed to address shortcomings in the diversity and inclusiveness of the scientific workforce. In response to this need and informed by multiple programs and data sources, we created the Research Scholars Program (RSP). The RSP is a yearlong program for early-career faculty with an overall objective to overcome barriers to the academic success, retention, progression, and promotion of groups underrepresented in biomedical and behavioral research. The goal of the RSP is to increase research confidence and productivity, build a supportive research community, and reduce isolation by providing personal and group research enrichment to junior faculty through professional development, mentorship, and networking. Methods: We adapted evidence-based approaches for our institutional context and vetted the RSP across our campus. The resulting RSP consists of three main elements: (1) five levels of Mosaic Mentorship; (2) group and tailored professional development programming; and (3) scientific and social networking. To determine the potential of the RSP to improve research confidence critical to success, we used a modified shortened version of the Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI-12) to assess participants' confidence in performing a variety of research tasks before and after program participation. We collected information about retention, promotion, and grants submitted and awarded. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured exit interviews with each scholar after program participation to identify programmatic strengths and areas for improvement. Data for Cohorts 1 and 2 (N = 12) were analyzed. Results: Our assessment finds, with one exception, increasing confidence in participants' research skills across all items, ranging from 0.4 (4.7%) to 2.6 (40.6%). In their exit interviews, the Research Scholars (RS) described their improved productivity and increased sense of belonging and support from others. Research Scholars noted numerous components of the RSP as strengths, including the Mosaic Mentorship model, professional development programming, and opportunities for both informal and formal interactions. Respondents identified time pressure, a lack of feedback, and unclear expectations of the various mentorship roles as areas in which the program can improve. Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate that the RSP is successful in building the research confidence of underrepresented and disadvantaged early-career faculty. While this report focuses on the development and protocol of the RSP, additional cohorts and data will provide the evidence base to support dissemination as a national model of research professional development. Such programming is critical to ensure sustainable support structures, institutional networks, infrastructure, and resources that will improve discovery and equity through inclusive excellence.Item The paucity of morality in everyday talk(Springer Nature, 2023-04-12) Atari, Mohammad; Mehl, Matthias R.; Graham, Jesse; Doris, John M.; Schwarz, Norbert; Davani, Aida Mostafazadeh; Omrani, Ali; Kennedy, Brendan; Gonzalez, Elaine; Jafarzadeh, Nikki; Hussain, Alyzeh; Mirinjian, Arineh; Madden, Annabelle; Bhatia, Rhea; Burch, Alexander; Harlan, Allison; Sbarra, David A.; Raison, Charles L.; Moseley, Suzanne A.; Polsinelli, Angelina J.; Dehghani, Morteza; Neurology, School of MedicineGiven its centrality in scholarly and popular discourse, morality should be expected to figure prominently in everyday talk. We test this expectation by examining the frequency of moral content in three contexts, using three methods: (a) Participants’ subjective frequency estimates (N = 581); (b) Human content analysis of unobtrusively recorded in-person interactions (N = 542 participants; n = 50,961 observations); and (c) Computational content analysis of Facebook posts (N = 3822 participants; n = 111,886 observations). In their self-reports, participants estimated that 21.5% of their interactions touched on morality (Study 1), but objectively, only 4.7% of recorded conversational samples (Study 2) and 2.2% of Facebook posts (Study 3) contained moral content. Collectively, these findings suggest that morality may be far less prominent in everyday life than scholarly and popular discourse, and laypeople, presume.