Browsing by Subject "Pediatric intensive care units"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Critical Care Utilization in Children With Cancer: U.S. Pediatric Health Information System Database Cohort 2012-2021
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2024) Rogerson, Colin M.; Rowan, Courtney M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objectives: To determine changes in pediatric oncology hospitalizations requiring intensive care over the period 2012-2021. Design: Retrospective study of hospital admission. Setting: Registry data from 36 children's hospitals in the U.S. Pediatric Health Information Systems database. Patients: Children 18 years or younger admitted to any of 36 hospitals with an oncology diagnosis. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: There were a total of 55,827 unique patients accounted for 281,221 pediatric oncology hospitalizations over the 10-year period, and 16.6% of hospitalizations included admission to the PICU. Hospitalizations and PICU admissions steadily increased over this decade. Between 2012 and 2016, 15.1% of oncology hospitalizations were admitted to the PICU compared with 18.0% from 2017 to 2021 (difference 2.9% [95% CI, 2.6-3.2%] p ≤ 0.0001). Support with invasive mechanical ventilation also increased over time with 3.7% during 2012-2016 compared with 4.1% from 2017 to 2021 (difference 0.4% [95% CI, 0.2-0.5%] p ≤ 0.0001). Similar results were seen with cardiorespiratory life support using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (difference 0.05% [95% CI, 0.02-0.07%] p = 0.0002), multiple vasoactive agent use (difference 0.3% [95% CI, 0.2-0.4%] p < 0.0001), central line placement (difference 5.3% [95% CI, 5.1-5.6%], p < 0.001), and arterial line placement (difference 0.4% [95% CI, 0.3-0.4%], p < 0.001). Year-on-year case fatality rate was unchanged over time (1.3%), but admission to the PICU during the second 5 years, compared with the first 5 years, was associated with lower odds of mortality (difference 0.7% [95% CI, 0.3-1.1%]) (odds ratio 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90%] p < 0.001). Conclusions: The percentage of pediatric oncology hospitalizations resulting in PICU admission has increased over the past 10 years. Despite the increasing use of PICU admission and markers of acuity, and on comparing 2017-2021 with 2012-2016, there are lower odds of mortality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A PALISI Network Document
    (American Thoracic Society Journals, 2022-08-15) Abu-Sultaneh, Samer; Iyer, Narayan Prabhu; Fernández, Analía; Gaies, Michael; González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián; Hotz, Justin Christian; Kneyber, Martin C.J.; López-Fernández, Yolanda M.; Rotta, Alexandre T.; Werho, David K.; Baranwal, Arun Kumar; Blackwood, Bronagh; Craven, Hannah J.; Curley, Martha A.Q.; Essouri, Sandrine; Fioretto, Jose Roberto; Hartmann, Silvia M.M.; Jouvet, Philippe; Korang, Steven Kwasi; Rafferty, Gerrard F.; Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan; Rose, Louise; Tume, Lyvonne N.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Wong, Judith Ju Ming; Emeriaud, Guillaume; Mastropietro, Christopher W; Napolitano, Natalie; Newth, Christopher J.L.; Khemani, Robinder G.
    RATIONALE: Pediatric specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients' readiness for extubation. METHODS: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multi-professional panel to establish pediatric specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. Systematic review was conducted for questions which did not meet an a-priori threshold of ≥80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence, drafted, and voted on the recommendations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three questions related to systematic screening, using an extubation readiness testing bundle and use of a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ≥80% agreement. For the remaining 8 questions, 5 systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials; measures of respiratory muscle strength; assessment of risk of post-extubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention; use of post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support; and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Document
    (American Thoracic Society, 2023) Abu-Sultaneh, Samer; Iyer, Narayan Prabhu; Fernández, Analía; Gaies, Michael; González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián; Hotz, Justin Christian; Kneyber, Martin C. J.; López-Fernández, Yolanda M.; Rotta, Alexandre T.; Werho, David K.; Baranwal, Arun Kumar; Blackwood, Bronagh; Craven, Hannah J.; Curley, Martha A. Q.; Essouri, Sandrine; Fioretto, Jose Roberto; Hartmann, Silvia M. M.; Jouvet, Philippe; Korang, Steven Kwasi; Rafferty, Gerrard F.; Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan; Rose, Louise; Tume, Lyvonne N.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Wong, Judith J. M.; Emeriaud, Guillaume; Mastropietro, Christopher W.; Napolitano, Natalie; Newth, Christopher J. L.; Khemani, Robinder G.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Rationale: Pediatric-specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients’ readiness for extubation. Methods: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multiprofessional panel to establish pediatrics-specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. A systematic review was conducted for questions that did not meet an a priori threshold of ⩾80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence and drafted and voted on the recommendations. Measurements and Main Results: Three questions related to systematic screening using an extubation readiness testing bundle and a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ⩾80% agreement. For the remaining eight questions, five systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials, measures of respiratory muscle strength, assessment of risk of postextubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention, use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support, and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Provider Use of a Novel EHR display in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Large Customizable Interactive Monitor (LCIM)
    (Schattauer, 2016-07-20) Asan, Onur; Holden, Richard J.; Flynn, Kathryn E.; Yang, Yushi; Azam, Laila; Scanlon, Matthew C.; BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing
    OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore providers' perspectives on the use of a novel technology, "Large Customizable Interactive Monitor" (LCIM), a novel application of the electronic health record system implemented in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. METHODS: We employed a qualitative approach to collect and analyze data from pediatric intensive care physicians, pediatric nurse practitioners, and acute care specialists. Using semi-structured interviews, we collected data from January to April, 2015. The research team analyzed the transcripts using an iterative coding method to identify common themes. RESULTS: Study results highlight contextual data on providers' use routines of the LCIM. Findings from thirty six interviews were classified into three groups: 1) providers' familiarity with the LCIM; 2) providers' use routines (i.e. when and how they use it); and 3) reasons why they use or do not use it. CONCLUSION: It is important to conduct baseline studies of the use of novel technologies. The importance of training and orientation affects the adoption and use patterns of this new technology. This study is notable for being the first to investigate a LCIM system, a next generation system implemented in the pediatric critical care setting. Our study revealed this next generation HIT might have great potential for family-centered rounds, team education during rounds, and family education/engagement in their child's health in the patient room. This study also highlights the effect of training and orientation on the adoption patterns of new technology.